• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Mike Malloy FIRED from Air America Radio

Scribbler said:
I don't think I've ever called you a conservative, although I certainly have compared you to Maloney. You both have an unhealthy obsession with trashing Air America, but at least Maloney gets a little something from Amazon for his efforts.

Now you're offering a medical opinion. Maybe you're really Mike Newcomb.

If you check, you will see I only used one name at a time. And it was always obvious who I was.
Again, your obsession seems to be with outing people with whom you disagree, not responding to the substance of their posts.
You seem to have a good deal of time to come here and puff Air America Radio (and occasionally to knock other progressive talk players). Maybe that's part of your job at AAR. Jon Sinton read one of those articles about the new word of mouth marketing and how to create buzz online and you got the job.
 
fred flintstone said:
Scribbler said:
I don't think I've ever called you a conservative, although I certainly have compared you to Maloney. You both have an unhealthy obsession with trashing Air America, but at least Maloney gets a little something from Amazon for his efforts.

Now you're offering a medical opinion. Maybe you're really Mike Newcomb.

If you check, you will see I only used one name at a time. And it was always obvious who I was.
Again, your obsession seems to be with outing people with whom you disagree, not responding to the substance of their posts.
You seem to have a good deal of time to come here and puff Air America Radio (and occasionally to knock other progressive talk players). Maybe that's part of your job at AAR. Jon Sinton read one of those articles about the new word of mouth marketing and how to create buzz online and you got the job.

Hmmm... let's see...

Scribbler = 503 posts
Fred Flintstone = 1087 posts (not including your other names)

Pot, meet kettle.

And Fred, I do know you check the search engines. I do too, and I see a lot of similarities in what you post:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q="air+america"&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&q="Air+America"&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d

I'm not criticizing it, but it seems you have a rather unhealthy obsession about something you obviously don't like. Me? I publish a blog about this stuff.
 
FightingIrish said:
I'm not criticizing it, but it seems you have a rather unhealthy obsession about something you obviously don't like. Me? I publish a blog about this stuff.

So, I guess 'publishing' a 'blog' about 'this stuff' qualifies as a ...'healthy' obsession?

Isn't that exactly what the hated 'Maloney' does?

Pot=Kettle ;)
 
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
I'm not criticizing it, but it seems you have a rather unhealthy obsession about something you obviously don't like. Me? I publish a blog about this stuff.

So, I guess 'publishing' a 'blog' about 'this stuff' qualifies as a ...'healthy' obsession?

Isn't that exactly what the hated 'Maloney' does?

Pot=Kettle ;)

It's a news site. And I don't simmer in hatred and spite like Baloney and his ilk. Obsessing over things one hates is what I would call an 'unhealthy obsession'.

At least it's not like I'm spamming message boards with nonsense and flamebait like you.
 
>>simmer in hatred and spite

sounds like the Mike Malloy board or similar ones. Maloney's board, at least to those on the right,
seems more like Schadenfreude. Taking pleasure in misfortunes of others. When an AAR host gets the
ratings of Rush or Hannity, let me know.
 
raccoonradio said:
sounds like the Mike Malloy board or similar ones. Maloney's board, at least to those on the right,
seems more like Schadenfreude. Taking pleasure in misfortunes of others. When an AAR host gets the
ratings of Rush or Hannity, let me know.

More likely, political talk has peaked and Rush and Hannity will eventually get the ratings of AAR hosts.
 
fred flintstone said:
Maybe you're really Mike Newcomb.

If you check, you will see I only used one name at a time. And it was always obvious who I was.
Again, your obsession seems to be with outing people with whom you disagree, not responding to the substance of their posts.
You seem to have a good deal of time to come here and puff Air America Radio (and occasionally to knock other progressive talk players). Maybe that's part of your job at AAR. Jon Sinton read one of those articles about the new word of mouth marketing and how to create buzz online and you got the job.
I've never met Mike Newcomb or Jon Sinton, although Sinton does sign those big checks I get for my posts on a message board read by a handful of talk radio junkies (gee, I wonder how my checks compare with the ones Fred gets from Jones and WOR?).

Sinton was especially happy about the post in which I said I could only take Randi Rhodes in small doses and usually listened to NPR or Thom Hartmann podcasts instead. As he said in a note with my bonus check, "We only need five minutes to boost our cume, baby!"

BTW, according to the Radio-Info software, I've averaged 0.85 posts per day since December 2004. That's an average of five and a half posts a week, so I'll have to admit that Fred is correct when he says I spend "a good deal of time" posting here. I'd say it adds up to about twelve minutes a week (gotta cut down! gotta cut down!).
 
barooosk said:
This thread is too focused on "how" rather than "why" Malloy was canned. We know that AAR is very reluctant to let anyone go. Does anybody even remember Liz Winstead? Why did they decide to go after Malloy with his large following of late night listeners. Many who've been listening to him since his stint at IE America. I suspect that he had crossed the line where liberals are not supposed to go. It's one thing to suggest that 2000 or 2004 election was stolen by the Republicans, but when you start suggesting that Bush had something to do with 9/11 attacks and you give over two hours to a Lyndon Larouche advocate you are crossing the line. I suspect that this why Malloy was let go.

Look, I liked Malloy, but rarely listened due to commitments that time of night.

But last summer, I tuned in and found him saying he was tired, defeated, hopeless.

I mean, it was just plain sad. The listeners were calling in to cheer him up.

The guy sounded drained and had no energy. If I were AAR management I would have pulled the plug at that moment.
 
FightingIrish said:
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
I'm not criticizing it, but it seems you have a rather unhealthy obsession about something you obviously don't like. Me? I publish a blog about this stuff.

So, I guess 'publishing' a 'blog' about 'this stuff' qualifies as a ...'healthy' obsession?

Isn't that exactly what the hated 'Maloney' does?

Pot=Kettle ;)

It's a news site.

Ahhh yes. A 'news site'.

Let's go to your archives and take a little peek @ , say, November 3rd 2004....?

Now, that just screams " News Site "!! ::)

Of course, every 'credible', objective 'news site' would repost an essay about losing the election 2 days later by none other then that bastion of objective journalism, Micheal Moore titled ' 17 reasons not to slit your wrist now that Bush is president '.

"At least it's not like I'm spamming message boards with nonsense"

Your absolutely right, FI. Calling your blog a 'news site' isn't at all nonsense. Thanks for playing ;)
 
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
I'm not criticizing it, but it seems you have a rather unhealthy obsession about something you obviously don't like. Me? I publish a blog about this stuff.

So, I guess 'publishing' a 'blog' about 'this stuff' qualifies as a ...'healthy' obsession?

Isn't that exactly what the hated 'Maloney' does?

Pot=Kettle ;)

It's a news site.

Ahhh yes. A 'news site'.

Let's go to your archives and take a little peek @ , say, November 3rd 2004....?

Now, that just screams " News Site "!! ::)

Of course, every 'credible', objective 'news site' would repost an essay about losing the election 2 days later by none other then that bastion of objective journalism, Micheal Moore titled ' 17 reasons not to slit your wrist now that Bush is president '.

"At least it's not like I'm spamming message boards with nonsense"

Your absolutely right, FI. Calling your blog a 'news site' isn't at all nonsense. Thanks for playing ;)

Thanks for the traffic! ;D Looks like you've got a lot of useless time on your hands wading through two years of my blog posts.
 
FightingIrish said:
Looks like you've got a lot of useless time on your hands wading through two years of my blog posts.

sooo, I guess wading through your blog is useless?

Your right! You have more in common with Baloney then you think! ;)

You both write useless blogs that claim to be 'news sites' but are in fact, useless ideological opinion troughs!!

You right though, I do have alot of useless time on my hands. Just check out my 'blog' ;D
 
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
Looks like you've got a lot of useless time on your hands wading through two years of my blog posts.

sooo, I guess wading through your blog is useless?

Your right! You have more in common with Baloney then you think! ;)

You both write useless blogs that claim to be 'news sites' but are in fact, useless ideological opinion troughs!!

You right though, I do have alot of useless time on my hands. Just check out my 'blog' ;D

Well, I guess you liked it enough to spend a considerable enough amount of time reading it.

Again, I thank you for the traffic!
 
FightingIrish said:
evnlee said:
FightingIrish said:
Looks like you've got a lot of useless time on your hands wading through two years of my blog posts.

sooo, I guess wading through your blog is useless?

Your right! You have more in common with Baloney then you think! ;)

You both write useless blogs that claim to be 'news sites' but are in fact, useless ideological opinion troughs!!

You right though, I do have alot of useless time on my hands. Just check out my 'blog' ;D

Well, I guess you liked it enough to spend a considerable enough amount of time reading it.

Again, I thank you for the traffic!

It's the very least I can do to help your advertisers...And AAR's ;)


Some people go to see "Snakes on a Plane" to be entertained....Then there are those that just wan't to point and laugh at how ridiculously bad it is. No one's wasting thier time, though, because someone is still getting paid..Now, if they had made the movie for FREE, and put it out there to be jeered, then it would be like your little blog. Which is so darn cute, and always gives me a good 'chuckle' like Maloney's. Both trying so hard to be taken seriously, and both so apparent in thier prejudices. Don't bother to thank me, I'll keep reading you both. I like a good laugh ;D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom