It is funny, BigA. You post is good. I think what listeners generally have thought (and some still think) is NPR is a national news and entertainment source highly focused on informing well-educated, higher wealth demographics, while appearing to be relevant enough and cool enough to reach into a variety of ages and sub demographics without appearing to be overly elite. I have seen some interesting online content (videos) in the last week that have had to have warning labels for language that would never be possible on radio. In fact, I have read some online discussions in the commercial segment of radio have noted that only NPR could get away with such content and not be called out and yet there is the question of federal "funding" that should be questioned based upon similar content. (Note: that content is Not on radio.) I honestly could not imagine radio in America without NPR. I agree, they will continue to properly market their content. Whether radio listeners engage in listening to this content on the radio vs. online is the issue. Will there be enough and will they be enough to satisfy fund-raising and corporate sponsorships, etc.?