• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

National Review: War Of The TV Morning News Divas??

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
This article by Myrna Blyth on the National Review website, although I consider it to be gossip, claims that in the event that Katie Couric jumps to CBS to take over their "Evening News" (which seems likely later this year), that ABC's Diane Sawyer wants to anchor "World News Tonight", despite the fact that "WNT" is currently co-anchored by Elizabeth Vargas (who will be going on maternbity leave late this Summer) and Bob Woodruff (who's been recovering from serious injuries suffered in Iraq; it's anybody's guess as to when he will return although I suspect ABC hopes it will be around or even before Vargas goes on maternity leave).

Blyth's article compares that the Couric/Sawyer competition to two high-school girls both hoping to be named "Most Popular".

Unless Woodruff's condition ends up precluding his returning to "WNT" (and at this point, I think it's too soon to tell when he'd be back, based on published reports on his condition), the speculated demands of Sawyer, as told in the article, would leave at least one, maybe two disgruntled anchors at ABC News. And Sawyer's longtime cohost on "Good Morning America", Charles Gibson, might also get quite upset for it would be the second time in less than a year that he gets denied the big chair.

Although, as stated above, I think the piece is for the most part gossip, let's assume for a moment that Sawyer does displace the Vargas/Woodruff team, and Couric (as widely expected) does go to CBS.

Under Sawyer, I actually think the "World News Tonight" format would be pretty much the same as it is now, except that she'd have occassional live newsmaker interviews, but they'd be brief, and few and far between.

On the other hand, to best use Couric's talents, the "CBS Evening News" would have to be radically reformatted. She would be miscast as anchor of a CBS newscast in the Walter Cronkite or Dan Rather traditions. Assuming Couric gets the CBS anchor chair, I can see the "Evening News" format be changed to one where the broadcast opens with about ten minutes of "hard" news, and after the first commercial (except on busy news days or when there's late-breaking news), interviews (some with newsmakers, others with showbiz types), "soft" feature segments, and even showbiz stuff. After the first ten minutes, you might think that you were watching "Entertainment Tonight" or "Access Hollywood" instead of the "CBS Evening News". News "purists" would cry foul, but there probably is an audience for such a radical new format for a network evening newscast, a viewing audience substantially younger than the demographics that currently dominate network evening newscast viewership.
 
Ron Claiborne

Maybe instead of changing the morning show, they can move weekender Ron Claiborne to World News Tonight. He's pretty good and I think he would do well as an evening news anchor.

What do you think?
 
> This article by Myrna Blyth on the National Review website,
> although I consider it to be gossip,
That waste of a column makes The National Enquirer look like Pulitzer Prize material. Gotta love those "telling friends" references treated like legitimate sources.

>claims that in the
> event that Katie Couric jumps to CBS to take over their
> "Evening News" (which seems likely later this year), that
> ABC's Diane Sawyer wants to anchor "World News Tonight",
> despite the fact that "WNT" is currently co-anchored by
> Elizabeth Vargas (who will be going on maternbity leave late
> this Summer) and Bob Woodruff (who's been recovering from
> serious injuries suffered in Iraq; it's anybody's guess as
> to when he will return although I suspect ABC hopes it will
> be around or even before Vargas goes on maternity leave).

This is like some kind of goulish obsession, dating back to when Mr. Woodruff was first injured and you conjured up scenarios about live feeds from his hospital room during sweeps.

Maybe, just maybe, ABC hopes Bob continues his recovery and gets to go home to his family, with the anchoring issue a secondary concern. They have lots of people they could use to cover the maternity leave.

>
> Blyth's article compares that the Couric/Sawyer competition
> to two high-school girls both hoping to be named "Most
> Popular".
>
> Unless Woodruff's condition ends up precluding his returning
> to "WNT" (and at this point, I think it's too soon to tell
> when he'd be back, based on published reports on his
> condition), the speculated demands of Sawyer, as told in the
> article, would leave at least one, maybe two disgruntled
> anchors at ABC News. And Sawyer's longtime cohost on "Good
> Morning America", Charles Gibson, might also get quite upset
> for it would be the second time in less than a year that he
> gets denied the big chair.
>
> Although, as stated above, I think the piece is for the most
> part gossip, let's assume for a moment that Sawyer does
> displace the Vargas/Woodruff team, and Couric (as widely
> expected) does go to CBS.
>
> Under Sawyer, I actually think the "World News Tonight"
> format would be pretty much the same as it is now, except
> that she'd have occassional live newsmaker interviews, but
> they'd be brief, and few and far between.
>
> On the other hand, to best use Couric's talents, the "CBS
> Evening News" would have to be radically reformatted.

Not necessarily. Just because someone can do one format doesn't mean they can't do another. Charlie Gibson has been equally at home doing the looser morning show as he has filling in on the evening news. Elizabeth Vargas did an outstanding job when she filled in on GMA, and is a fine fit in her new role.

Katie may be just fine in an evening anchor role.

>She
> would be miscast as anchor of a CBS newscast in the Walter
> Cronkite or Dan Rather traditions. Assuming Couric gets the
> CBS anchor chair, I can see the "Evening News" format be
> changed to one where the broadcast opens with about ten
> minutes of "hard" news, and after the first commercial
> (except on busy news days or when there's late-breaking
> news), interviews (some with newsmakers, others with showbiz
> types), "soft" feature segments, and even showbiz stuff.
> After the first ten minutes, you might think that you were
> watching "Entertainment Tonight" or "Access Hollywood"
> instead of the "CBS Evening News". News "purists" would cry
> foul, but there probably is an audience for such a radical
> new format for a network evening newscast, a viewing
> audience substantially younger than the demographics that
> currently dominate network evening newscast viewership.
>
And now back to reality....
 
> This article by Myrna Blyth on the National Review website,
> although I consider it to be gossip, claims that in the
> event that Katie Couric jumps to CBS to take over their
> "Evening News" (which seems likely later this year), that
> ABC's Diane Sawyer wants to anchor "World News Tonight",
> despite the fact that "WNT" is currently co-anchored by
> Elizabeth Vargas (who will be going on maternbity leave late
> this Summer) and Bob Woodruff (who's been recovering from
> serious injuries suffered in Iraq; it's anybody's guess as
> to when he will return although I suspect ABC hopes it will
> be around or even before Vargas goes on maternity leave).
>
> Blyth's article compares that the Couric/Sawyer competition
> to two high-school girls both hoping to be named "Most
> Popular".
>
> Unless Woodruff's condition ends up precluding his returning
> to "WNT" (and at this point, I think it's too soon to tell
> when he'd be back, based on published reports on his
> condition), the speculated demands of Sawyer, as told in the
> article, would leave at least one, maybe two disgruntled
> anchors at ABC News. And Sawyer's longtime cohost on "Good
> Morning America", Charles Gibson, might also get quite upset
> for it would be the second time in less than a year that he
> gets denied the big chair.
>
> Although, as stated above, I think the piece is for the most
> part gossip, let's assume for a moment that Sawyer does
> displace the Vargas/Woodruff team, and Couric (as widely
> expected) does go to CBS.
>
> Under Sawyer, I actually think the "World News Tonight"
> format would be pretty much the same as it is now, except
> that she'd have occassional live newsmaker interviews, but
> they'd be brief, and few and far between.
>
> On the other hand, to best use Couric's talents, the "CBS
> Evening News" would have to be radically reformatted. She
> would be miscast as anchor of a CBS newscast in the Walter
> Cronkite or Dan Rather traditions. Assuming Couric gets the
> CBS anchor chair, I can see the "Evening News" format be
> changed to one where the broadcast opens with about ten
> minutes of "hard" news, and after the first commercial
> (except on busy news days or when there's late-breaking
> news), interviews (some with newsmakers, others with showbiz
> types), "soft" feature segments, and even showbiz stuff.
> After the first ten minutes, you might think that you were
> watching "Entertainment Tonight" or "Access Hollywood"
> instead of the "CBS Evening News". News "purists" would cry
> foul, but there probably is an audience for such a radical
> new format for a network evening newscast, a viewing
> audience substantially younger than the demographics that
> currently dominate network evening newscast viewership.
>
 
Re: Ron Claiborne

ABC's first priority should be to make sure Bob Woodruff can return to "World News Tonight". I don't know when it will be, but as I suggested earlier, I think the network (and millions of viewers) would like to see that happen around or even just prior to Elizabeth Vargas' maternity leave.

I don't know how long Woodruff's recovery has to go, but I hope it will be a short time until he's back on the air.

As for Diane Sawyer , she and Charles Gibson should stick to "Good Morning America" for one simple reason: When (not if) Katie Couric leaves "Today", "GMA" could very well become the nation's most popular morning television news show within weeks of Couric's departure. In fact, if Gibson and Sawyer remain together on "GMA", it could a year from now be getting as many viewers as "Today" and the "CBS News Early Show" combined.
 
Re: Ron Claiborne

> ABC's first priority should be to make sure Bob Woodruff can
> return to "World News Tonight". I don't know when it will
> be, but as I suggested earlier, I think the network (and
> millions of viewers) would like to see that happen around or
> even just prior to Elizabeth Vargas' maternity leave.
>

Do you believe millions of viewers care if his return is in any way related to the timing of Elizabeth's maternity leave? They hope he gets well enough to come back--before, during or after her maternity leave has no bearing on good wishes for his continued recovery.

> I don't know how long Woodruff's recovery has to go, but I
> hope it will be a short time until he's back on the air.
>
> As for Diane Sawyer , she and Charles Gibson should stick to
> "Good Morning America" for one simple reason: When (not if)
> Katie Couric leaves "Today", "GMA" could very well become
> the nation's most popular morning television news show
> within weeks of Couric's departure. In fact, if Gibson and
> Sawyer remain together on "GMA", it could a year from now be
> getting as many viewers as "Today" and the "CBS News Early
> Show" combined.
>
That, or NBC might put someone in who gives the show a fresh chemistry, one that clicks from the start. If any of ABC's gain was a result of "Katie fatigue," you could get some sampling back to NBC. There aren't any sure things in this sweepstakes.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom