In your opinion.The irony is that every time Audacy, or one of its corporate predecessors, tried to do Alternative in NYC, the execution was terrible.
That's not at all how that happened. Programmers today depend on information about listeners that goes beyond the past-tense Nielsen ratings. They use research to try to find a "sweet spot" in different format areas.They always brought in some hotshot programmer who thought he knew better than everyone else, and who massively over-thought how to program the format, and ruined it instead.
The problem with Alternative is that the genre is very fragmented. What you think was "ruined" was actually the mix or blend that the largest number of alternative listeners liked. The problem is that all the fragmented parts have little in common except for, maybe, the top 50 to 100 songs. Beyond that, each group dislikes the songs of the other groups.
In your opinion. The problem is, as I have said, the various fragments of the alternative fan universe don't even like what the other groups love.Now that alternative has been exiled to a never-to-be-heard HD2 channel, the music mix and the imaging are actually sounding better than ever. In fact, it finally sounds exactly the way an alternative station should sound, programmed the way it should have been done in NYC all along, musically anyway.
You are doing what bad program directors do: judging formats and playlists based on your own personal taste. This is the same thing that many/most pirates do: playing a personal playlist because they think everyone has the same taste as they do. A good PD finds out what the largest reachable segment of the public will listen to by talking to them.It's too bad they could never manage to do this, with the addition of some star air talent, when it was on a main FM channel where people could hear it.