The AM hybrid mode ("MA1") uses 30 kHz of bandwidth (±15 kHz), and overlaps adjacent channels on both sides of the station's assigned channel.What do you mean by "hybrid digital"?
The AM hybrid mode ("MA1") uses 30 kHz of bandwidth (±15 kHz), and overlaps adjacent channels on both sides of the station's assigned channel.What do you mean by "hybrid digital"?
Although licensed to Estrella Media, the station we can’t talk about is under the de facto control of an individual we can’t talk about.According to the FCC station database, the licensee of "that station" is Estrella Radio License of Houston, LLC. This appears to be a Hispanic broadcaster. Are we no longer allowed to discuss Hispanic broadcasters on this board? Please clarify.
I never mentioned "multiple digital feeds regarding AM HD. Although FM does provide for other digital channels (HD2, HD3, etc.), AM HD does not. To my knowledge, AM HD provides for a single digital channel in addition to the analog broadcast, which translates to HD1. I don't believe there is enough bandwidth on AM to support anything else.That could be possible. I'm not familiar with all the intricacies of HD Radio and using the technology on AM. My understanding is that a couple of stations have turned off analog AM and gone all digital. A couple of those have tried running a second channel on AM and proved that it was possible, but the FCC has never allowed them to run those extra channels as anything other than a temporary test. Current HD Radio receivers on the consumer market are not able to decode multiple digital streams on AM, or so I've been told.
WTAW, to the best of my knowledge, does not and never has run multiple digital feeds on AM 1620.
WTAW owner Bryan Broadcasting has been among several groups advocating for the authorization of full digital MA3 on a permanent basis in the AM band. The station has never been fully digital AFAIK, but continues to transmit in AM-HD.They discussed going fully digital but I don’t think they have.
By " fully digital," I presume you are referring to MA3 (as opposed to MA1, Hybrid AM, or AM HD). Obviously, totally abandoning the existing analog AM broadcast system would be preferable from a technocal standpoint rather than a compromise, which is what AM Hd essentially is. But how would you support the millions of listeners aho only have analog AM broadcast band radios, and would find them instantly worthless when the switch is made? Not to mentikon the station oners who would find the vast majority of their listeners disappear, and the advertisers, who would notice less heads covered?WTAW owner Bryan Broadcasting has been among several groups advocating for the authorization of full digital MA3 on a permanent basis in the AM band. The station has never been fully digital AFAIK, but continues to transmit in AM-HD.
They literally said MA3 in the quote you replied toBy " fully digital," I presume you are referring to MA3 (as opposed to MA1, Hybrid AM, or AM HD).
Are you suggesting that the station you refer to as KFNC-F2, which in actuality is a translator whose actual call is K223CW, does not have a host station, either an AM station or one of those grey area, leased HD subcarriers?
My next question is, who owns this potentially-illegal translator? The non-existant "host station?"
Follow the money...
What is the originating station for K223CW? And please don’t say KFNC, as the programming on 92.5 is not a full simulcast of 97.5. And please don’t say KFNC HD-2, as that DOES NOT EXIST as KFNC does not transmit an HD signal.K223CW was found to be operating within the parameters of its license.
So the owner of K223CW runs the Gow Media programming for free, and eats all the expenses of operating the translator, such as antenna site rent, electric costs, maintenance, and administrative functions? Rather hard to believe.KFNC does not pay the owner of K223CW any consideration for repeating its programming.
What is the originating station for K223CW? And please don’t say KFNC, as the programming on 92.5 is not a full simulcast of 97.5. And please don’t say KFNC HD-2, as that DOES NOT EXIST as KFNC does not transmit an HD signal.
So the owner of K223CW runs the Gow Media programming for free, and eats all the expenses of operating the translator, such as antenna site rent, electric costs, maintenance, and administrative functions? Rather hard to believe.
Meanwhile, please explain co-owned K287BQ which does not have an originating station. Is that translator also carrying the “Power” format for free?
The answers to your questions can be found here. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-93-338A1.pdfWhat is the originating station for K223CW? And please don’t say KFNC, as the programming on 92.5 is not a full simulcast of 97.5. And please don’t say KFNC HD-2, as that DOES NOT EXIST as KFNC does not transmit an HD signal.
So the owner of K223CW runs the Gow Media programming for free, and eats all the expenses of operating the translator, such as antenna site rent, electric costs, maintenance, and administrative functions? Rather hard to believe.
Meanwhile, please explain co-owned K287BQ which does not have an originating station. Is that translator also carrying the “Power” format for free?
We all know the translator rules. To start, a commercial translator must only carry a licensed AM, FM or HD channel with certain coverage restrictions. They can't originate programming, and local station translators can't carry separate ads from the originating signal.The answers to your questions can be found here. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-93-338A1.pdf
It appears to be 100% originated for K287BQ with no licensed AM, FM or HD channel providing the content.Meanwhile, please explain co-owned K287BQ which does not have an originating station. Is that translator also carrying the “Power” format for free?
We all know the translator rules. To start, a commercial translator must only carry a licensed AM, FM or HD channel with certain coverage restrictions. They can't originate programming, and local station translators can't carry separate ads from the originating signal.
Your allegation that the translator carries a commercial station at no cost and with no consideration, salary or compensation needs to be further clarified.
The translators in question appear to not be doing that.
Why should I not believe that you and Astros2023 are not sock puppets? (Rhetorical question as I think I know the answer already).
If that's really true then they must have been tipped off that they're coming in town and temporarily lowered power and went directional. I refuse to believe that 30 watts or less from downtown can be heard up to New Waverly without tropospheric ducting.It along with numerous overpowered allegations posted on this blog recently resulted in an FCC inspection. K223CW was found to be operating within the parameters of its license.
Are you going to post a picture of the transmitter control and what it currently says?First, there is the issue of a screen shot of what was alleged to be my client's transmitter control. This is pure fabrication and possibly libel. It along with numerous overpowered allegations posted on this blog recently resulted in an FCC inspection. K223CW was found to be operating within the parameters of its license.
Are you going to post a picture of the transmitter control and what it currently says?
I wouldn’t exactly use tropos as a reason for being overpowered. Now not being directional is another thing.Explain why I hear K223CW past Baytown interfering with Cool 92.5. Or why I heard K223CW all the way in Jennings, LA one day during tropo. That’s amazing for 28 watts with a null to the east.