And why the political reference? Perhaps the mental health show should have addressed TDS, an increasingly serious issue related to anger management in today’s society.
You're trying to double, or triple-down on this like someone on TV uses a Sharpie(tm) to prove their point with a (badly) modified weather map.
Let me explain.
This should have been a one page thread. Instead it's gone on for five because you've had an obsessive need to beat an already dead horse.
Why did they chose suicide/mental health as a topic and run it on all their stations? In the NYC police department 11 [at last count, I believe] current or retired police officers have committed suicide. WCBS 880 has been reporting on each one and using news bites from the police commissioner and even the news anchors have been imploring them to reach out to mental health professionals. Since WCBS may be the top dog of Entercom's stations and can be heard in Philadelphia during daytime, which is where Entercom's headquarters are, it's not surprising they'd chose that topic. Who knows, maybe one of the big shots at Entercom or a board member had someone close to them commit suicide or has mental health issues and they figured this would be a way to help. I'm sure that in their headquarter's city, they've had police kill themselves and I'm sure it's happened in other cities they have stations in.
And why the political reference? Perhaps the mental health show should have addressed TDS, an increasingly serious issue related to anger management in today’s society.
TDS?? THAT IS WHAT MY COMMENT WAS. GET IT NOW?
I didn't intend add to the length of this thread, but post #45 got me wondering about the real "Why?" of this story. So I Googled it.
As I noted earlier, big corporations seldom do anything virtuous out of the goodness of their hearts. There's generally another reason and, sure enough, this case appears to be no exception:
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...er-suicide-reference-in-tweet-0327-story.html
Now, if that incident led to a radio special that is actually helping to prevent suicides that's obviously a good thing. But let's stop short of calling Entercom "admirable" for using one of its lowest rated time slots to absolve itself of the backlash from hurtful remarks made on its air.
Some mignt say this is, "beating a dead horse," but nowhere else in this thread was the above incident mentioned and I believe it is significant.
Yes, also in another unrelated case Entercom was under fire for an incident in Sacramento for a death during a contest where it lead to questions over Entercom's ability to hold a radio license for their Sacramento cluster and that was brought up again in the Ed Stoltz dispute and in the FCC Hearing over Entercom's then proposed deal (finalized in 2017) to take over the CBS Radio affiliates.
https://www.allaccess.com/net-news/...esignates-entercom-s-license-renewal-for-kdnd
I didn't intend add to the length of this thread, but post #45 got me wondering about the real "Why?" of this story. So I Googled it.
As I noted earlier, big corporations seldom do anything virtuous out of the goodness of their hearts. There's generally another reason and, sure enough, this case appears to be no exception:
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...er-suicide-reference-in-tweet-0327-story.html
Now, if that incident led to a radio special that is actually helping to prevent suicides that's obviously a good thing. But let's stop short of calling Entercom "admirable" for using one of its lowest rated time slots to absolve itself of the backlash from hurtful remarks made on its air.
Some mignt say this is, "beating a dead horse," but nowhere else in this thread was the above incident mentioned and I believe it is significant.
I see no relationship between a local San Diego host’s remark on a new format and the special on 258 stations nationally.
And the contest did not seem to hamper DJ "Trish Sweet's" career. I guess a quick name change to "Jayde Donovan" and a cross country move covered her tracks! Good things don't seem to happen at stations where she works!!
Or, you know, it’s the nature of business.
I agree. Back in May, Field outlined five community issues the company would focus on:
https://radioink.com/2019/05/22/field-we-will-play-offense/
I'd expect to see future shows dealing with the four other issues. This fits well within the guidelines the FCC sets for licensees.