radiophiler said:Would Rush and Hannity's programs die immediate quick deaths? Certainly not. Could this cause Premiere to do some things like lower the prices they charge for Rush and allow more local commercial minutes per hour? It could. Could this be the beginning of a slow end for the biggest nationally syndicated conservative talker in history? Plausible.
radiophiler said:Perhaps the most plausible development out of all of this: Premiere gives in to Cumulus and seriously reduces what it's charging their stations to carry the program.
1998 wants their posts back.sjs1959 said:TheBigA said:RadioTalker101 said:BUT their plateau is still far above other's peaks.TheBigA said:Both of these shows have peaked. They peaked a long time ago. But their hosts and fans are still living in the past.
It doesn't matter. It's all AM, and it's all dying. In the end, ratings don't matter. Revenues do. And the revenue from AM news/talk is dropping because of aging demos and controversy. In a few years, it will occupy half the bandwidth is does now. News/Talk is the next Smooth Jazz, for the same reason.
THIS. The demos for this are all 55+ and no agency will touch it. Within the next 18 months, both of them will be on small-market AMs and satellite and that will be the end. All the denial in the industry won't change that.
Revenue may take a hit, the shows will still make money...radiophiler said:For those who are saying, "Rush loses 40 stations, he picks up 40 stations," I have a different point of view: That of someone who was in radio management at a Rush station previously, left radio, and is in management in another industry.
Point 1: Rush, at the start, COSTS stations money. Premiere charges a serious amount of money for stations to carry his show. In the mid 1990s, Premiere was charging $6,000 per year to the medium market station where I worked. It's now 20 years later. Imagine what they're charging today! In major (top 25) markets, the cost to carry Rush per year is in six figures.
Point 2: The time for calculating next year's budgets, for companies whose corporate year runs on a calendar year, starts in August. By Oct. 1, budgets for 2014 will be pretty much locked in. Now, imagine you're a non-CC station being approached to carry Rush next year with a price tag higher than you are probably paying some of your local talent. Oh, and by the way, you only get to have so many minutes of commercial inventory per hour.
I think it is just as plausible that, in markets where CC has no available AM station for Rush, Premiere has a difficult if not impossible time finding a new station for him. Fast forward one year later: Reports come in that the former Rush stations are "better off" without him, and his high fees and low local commercial avails.
Come late 2014/early 2015, more station owners start to say, "Yeah, maybe it's time we cut the Rush cord like the Cumulus stations did." More non-CC stations dump him.
Plausible, IMHO.
Would Rush and Hannity's programs die immediate quick deaths? Certainly not. Could this cause Premiere to do some things like lower the prices they charge for Rush and allow more local commercial minutes per hour? It could. Could this be the beginning of a slow end for the biggest nationally syndicated conservative talker in history? Plausible.
Perhaps the most plausible development out of all of this: Premiere gives in to Cumulus and seriously reduces what it's charging their stations to carry the program. Other non-CC owners start asking Premiere for "the Cumulus deal." Revenue Premiere makes from Rush takes a serious decline as a result.
RadioTalker101 said:1998 wants their posts back.
Maybe you missed the 200 other threads over the pat 10 years signaling the impending doom of talk radio. More likely, you wished they were true.FredLeonard said:RadioTalker101 said:1998 wants their posts back.
Winner: Dumb Post of the Day! Congratulations. And thank you for adding to the discussion.
RadioTalker101 said:More likely, you wished they were true.
RadioTalker101 said:A real headline should read: Limbaugh/Hannity to lose stations with #2 radio group and move to stations owned by the #1 radio grop...
radiophiler said:For those who are saying, "Rush loses 40 stations, he picks up 40 stations," I have a different point of view: That of someone who was in radio management at a Rush station previously, left radio, and is in management in another industry.
Point 1: Rush, at the start, COSTS stations money. Premiere charges a serious amount of money for stations to carry his show. In the mid 1990s, Premiere was charging $6,000 per year to the medium market station where I worked. It's now 20 years later. Imagine what they're charging today! In major (top 25) markets, the cost to carry Rush per year is in six figures.
Jimme said:radiophiler said:For those who are saying, "Rush loses 40 stations, he picks up 40 stations," I have a different point of view: That of someone who was in radio management at a Rush station previously, left radio, and is in management in another industry.
Point 1: Rush, at the start, COSTS stations money. Premiere charges a serious amount of money for stations to carry his show. In the mid 1990s, Premiere was charging $6,000 per year to the medium market station where I worked. It's now 20 years later. Imagine what they're charging today! In major (top 25) markets, the cost to carry Rush per year is in six figures.
Even in the 1990's, that $6,000 sounds like a bargain. Let's say for the sake of argument, are you telling me a local personality in New Haven or Nashville or Flint would make less than $6,000 a year for doing a call in show every day? I can't imagine Jerry Kristafer or Paul Pacelli at WELI New Haven were making only $6,000 a year for their morning and afternoon call in shows back in the day.
TheBigA said:RadioTalker101 said:A real headline should read: Limbaugh/Hannity to lose stations with #2 radio group and move to stations owned by the #1 radio grop...
But that doesn't help them in Chicago, Dallas, or DC. Or several other major markets where CC doesn't own talk stations.
salemjedi54 said:CC owns KFXR 1190 in Dallas Fort Worth
raccoonradio said:
umfan said:That's pretty sage analysis on the part of Colmes. The hyperbole regarding this change is really overblown and its not on both sides, it's almost completely from the detractors of Limbaugh and Hannity. They will find new outlets and ride this out.