• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Pugs challenged Russ Martin to a Cage Fight on 1360

Russ is entertaining. I am not his best friend. I am not a groupy. The guy entertains. He is a human we are all flawed. I would tune in to hear Russ talk about the incident, his growth as a man a human. GREAT RADIO. I wish I could display all you hater's actions criminal or otherwise on this board. I work by Russ Martin automotive. His business is flourishing just as he will when he TRIUMPHNATLY returns to Dallas radio locally or syndicated.

Pugs, Russ would whip your little sissy, whiney posterior!!! That would be great TV. Even Kelley could kick your arse.
 
ok, so I just called my girlfriend...got the drama going...personally, I like P&K on their current format. it took me about four years to get into their show on 105.3 and then I had about a year before the s. hit the fan (no pun intended) before they were gone. they sucked on the bone and we all know it (no pun intended) they are back on the air and serve as a good option when the Ticket goes to break...that being said Pugs would kill Russ...
and that being said; my pa could whip your pa. haha
 
Nik said:
I'm pretty sure Russ would tear Pugs limb from chubby limb ;D

And you'll sponsor it. What was that business you have, that plans to advertise when Russ supposedly returns to DFW radio?

Yeah....
 
Whatever the case. Pugs is only getting attention because of this. Once it blows over(and it will blow over), P&K will be out of yet another job. This time jettisoned from an AM station. Russ' fans aren't worried about all of this stuff on here, they have lives.
 
CDL33 said:
Russ' fans aren't worried about all of this stuff on here, they have lives.
It goes without saying that Russ is the most talked about radio personality on this message board.

If I were Russ, I would take a lie detector test about the assault, because my personal feeling is that their fight was probably blown way out of proportion.
 
northernlights said:
milton77 said:
Russ has 2,688 followers, meanwhile Pugs & Kelly have 461 followers on Twitter. Quite amusing

That's 2,688 idiots who probably condone hitting a woman when she talks back.

Nope, only when she gets back up. ;D :D
 
doggone123 said:
no contest
n. in criminal law, a defendant's plea in court that he/she will not contest the charge of a particular crime, also called nolo contendere. While technically not an admission of guilt for commission of the crime, the judge will treat a plea of "no contest" as such an admission and proceed to find the defendant guilty as charged. A "no contest" plea is often made in cases in which there is also a possible lawsuit for damages by a person injured by the criminal conduct (such as reckless driving, assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault), because it cannot be used in the civil lawsuit as an admission of fault. "No contest" is also used where there has been a "plea bargain" in which the defendant does not want to say he/she is guilty but accepts the sentence recommended by the prosecutor in exchange for not contesting the charge (which is often reduced to a lesser crime). It is standard practice for the judge to ask either the attorneys or the defendant, "Is there a factual basis for the plea?" before accepting it and finding the defendant guilty.

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1327

Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.
 
radio_insider said:
doggone123 said:
no contest
n. in criminal law, a defendant's plea in court that he/she will not contest the charge of a particular crime, also called nolo contendere. While technically not an admission of guilt for commission of the crime, the judge will treat a plea of "no contest" as such an admission and proceed to find the defendant guilty as charged. A "no contest" plea is often made in cases in which there is also a possible lawsuit for damages by a person injured by the criminal conduct (such as reckless driving, assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault), because it cannot be used in the civil lawsuit as an admission of fault. "No contest" is also used where there has been a "plea bargain" in which the defendant does not want to say he/she is guilty but accepts the sentence recommended by the prosecutor in exchange for not contesting the charge (which is often reduced to a lesser crime). It is standard practice for the judge to ask either the attorneys or the defendant, "Is there a factual basis for the plea?" before accepting it and finding the defendant guilty.

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1327

Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.

Don't you knw that Mr. Whitt is a God here and everything he writes is gospel, whether it's right or wrong? ::)
 
radio_insider said:
doggone123 said:
no contest
n. in criminal law, a defendant's plea in court that he/she will not contest the charge of a particular crime, also called nolo contendere. While technically not an admission of guilt for commission of the crime, the judge will treat a plea of "no contest" as such an admission and proceed to find the defendant guilty as charged. A "no contest" plea is often made in cases in which there is also a possible lawsuit for damages by a person injured by the criminal conduct (such as reckless driving, assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault), because it cannot be used in the civil lawsuit as an admission of fault. "No contest" is also used where there has been a "plea bargain" in which the defendant does not want to say he/she is guilty but accepts the sentence recommended by the prosecutor in exchange for not contesting the charge (which is often reduced to a lesser crime). It is standard practice for the judge to ask either the attorneys or the defendant, "Is there a factual basis for the plea?" before accepting it and finding the defendant guilty.

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1327

Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.

ID10T. I was giving a actual definiton, I could care less what is in a article. Did russ martin plead no contest? The answer is YES. The above definiton is what he agreed to!
 
radio_insider said:
Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.

But he accepted a plea deal that is, in essence, a plea of "Guilty Lite." What does that tell you?
 
Albert19X said:
radio_insider said:
Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.

But he accepted a plea deal that is, in essence, a plea of "Guilty Lite." What does that tell you?

radio_insider is obvioulsy a hanger on, that is trying to muddy the waters and take the focus off of the Criminal Offense.
 
doggone123 said:
Albert19X said:
radio_insider said:
Do any of you wannabes read the news? You seem to think Richie Whitt is the gospel, so go read his column from October of last year where Russ turned down the plea deal they offered, which would have made him plea guilty. Or I guess that would cause you guys to do research and actually make informed comments. My bad.

But he accepted a plea deal that is, in essence, a plea of "Guilty Lite." What does that tell you?

radio_insider is obvioulsy a hanger on, that is trying to muddy the waters and take the focus off of the Criminal Offense.

Probably should change his name to radio_outsider.
 
doggone123 said:

Go ask Top where the "ID10T" forms are. Fill it out and ask him where the prick e-8 mailbox is. ;D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom