• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Rupert Murdoch Buys Metromedia TV stations a 1985 News Clip

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4IgwfnUG3cM

This deal that included the sale of WCVB to Hearst. Plus stations like KTTV and WNEW(Now WNYW) would form the current Fox Television stations division. The deal was the largest of its time $2 billion was the estimate.

Fast forward to 2017 and we see groups like Nexstar and their deal with Media general for a deal overshadowed the event in 1985.

Plus Sinclairs takeover of Bonten and Tribune is way bigger in comparison.
 
Three things about this:

At one time, companies were limited to owning no more than 5 AM, 5 FM, and 5 TV stations. That was later expanded to 7 of each. Then in 1996, the national caps were eliminated. So that's why the Fox Metromedia deal seems so small in comparison to today.

The other thing is at the time, Rupert Murdoch was an Australian citizen, and News Corp was a foreign company. The FCC has laws restricting foreign ownership of broadcasting. It still does today. So Rupert not only had to renounce his Australian citizenship, but he had to convert News Corp into an American company. The conversion was long and costly. But he was willing to do it to enter American TV business.

Fast forward to today, the FCC is considering eliminating the foreign ownership rules. Critics believe it's a bad idea, and will allow companies from potentially hostile countries to own American broadcasting stations. Murdoch's example shows how it's possible for foreign companies to sidestep foreign ownership rules and still buy American broadcasting. We can think our laws can prevent foreign ownership of broadcasting, but really they can't. Had the FCC stuck to its rules, and prevented Murdoch from buying Metromedia, we might not have the Fox News Channel today.

Lastly, when Metromedia sold its TV stations, it was also interested in selling radio. John Kluge, the founder & CEO of Metromedia, was leaving broadcasting and getting into cellular communications, which he considered to be the future. So Metromedia radio was also on the market. Murdoch was not interested in buying the radio stations. A couple years later, NBC exited the radio business. This opened the door for companies like Emmis and Infinity to become radio-only companies. The ownership limits still prevented them from owning more than 7 AM & FM stations. But it signaled the beginning of the end for the heritage broadcasting companies of the 20th century, and was another moment when people wondered if radio was dead.
 
Last edited:
Also the interesting part here is that if you fast forward to 2017 you see that the Network owned stations like Fox, ABC, CBS and NBC own less TV stations than Sinclair and Nexstar.

Fox, NBC, and CBS each owns approximately 28 TV stations , Disney/ABC owns 8 TV stations. Also Network owned stations are mainly in located in larger DMA's and in the case of Fox mainly in NFC markets. Also the network owned stations as far as I know don't have their own version of Cunningham and Deerfield.

Also Fox, NBC, CBS and Disney/ABC also have to deal with cable, websites and apps to reach the rest of the nation.
 
Also the interesting part here is that if you fast forward to 2017 you see that the Network owned stations like Fox, ABC, CBS and NBC own less TV stations than Sinclair and Nexstar.

Exactly. The general view among the companies that own the networks is they're in the content business, not the towers and transmitters business. This is why they've all sold their radio stations, and why they're not buying TV stations, except in major markets. At some point, Disney will sell its TV stations. Companies like Sinclair and Nexstar aren't big in content creation. At least not now. The reason is simple: There's a lot of expense and regulation in owning broadcast facilities. Far less in creating content. With content distribution moving to the internet with Hulu and Netflix, why would anyone remain in an aging and expensive technology like broadcast TV?
 
Exactly. The general view among the companies that own the networks is they're in the content business, not the towers and transmitters business. This is why they've all sold their radio stations, and why they're not buying TV stations, except in major markets. At some point, Disney will sell its TV stations. Companies like Sinclair and Nexstar aren't big in content creation. At least not now. The reason is simple: There's a lot of expense and regulation in owning broadcast facilities. Far less in creating content. With content distribution moving to the internet with Hulu and Netflix, why would anyone remain in an aging and expensive technology like broadcast TV?

IIRC, News Corp sold a number of TV stations they owned in the early 00s - including KSBW 8 in Salinas/Monterey, CA - actually an NBC affiliate. More recently, Murdoch and Co. bought KTVU 2 in Oakland (San Francisco) to make it an O&O.
 
IIRC, News Corp sold a number of TV stations they owned in the early 00s - including KSBW 8 in Salinas/Monterey, CA - actually an NBC affiliate. More recently, Murdoch and Co. bought KTVU 2 in Oakland (San Francisco) to make it an O&O.


Wow I remember back in the 2014-2015 time frame when Fox was in the process to buy KTVU and KTVU+ from Cox broadcasting. I remember that the people who opposed the move for Fox Television to buy Fox2 were outraged. People here in San Francisco made the assumption that KTVU would be taken over by Roger Ailes and Sean Hannity with Must Run segments on KTVU Fox 2 News. As we now know this turned out to be false. If Jack Abernethy if Fox Television Stations and the Fox O&O News directors aired Sean Hannity and Roger Ailes clips then all hell would break loose at the Fox O&O studios all over the nation including KTVU.

However that argument turned out to be false though due to recent leadership changes at Fox News and a new News Director at KTVU2 News.

And it turned out that it was really Sinclair Television specifically Scott Livingston the leader of Sinclair that's been in the spot light recently that's was requiring News directors at their stations to air must run segments that were pro-Trump. That's been in the spotlight recently for 2 reasons one KTLA and WPIX are being taken over by Sinclair and two the leaders of Sinclair are considered more powerful than even Roger Ailes supposedly.
 
Wow I remember back in the 2014-2015 time frame when Fox was in the process to buy KTVU and KTVU+ from Cox broadcasting. I remember that the people who opposed the move for Fox Television to buy Fox2 were outraged. People here in San Francisco made the assumption that KTVU would be taken over by Roger Ailes and Sean Hannity with Must Run segments on KTVU Fox 2 News. As we now know this turned out to be false. If Jack Abernethy if Fox Television Stations and the Fox O&O News directors aired Sean Hannity and Roger Ailes clips then all hell would break loose at the Fox O&O studios all over the nation including KTVU.

However that argument turned out to be false though due to recent leadership changes at Fox News and a new News Director at KTVU2 News.

And it turned out that it was really Sinclair Television specifically Scott Livingston the leader of Sinclair that's been in the spot light recently that's was requiring News directors at their stations to air must run segments that were pro-Trump. That's been in the spotlight recently for 2 reasons one KTLA and WPIX are being taken over by Sinclair and two the leaders of Sinclair are considered more powerful than even Roger Ailes supposedly.

Murdoch is a pragmatist. KTVU has always had an excellent news department, and high ratings - even before they became a Fox affiliate in the 80s. The liberal-left SF Bay Area would abandon KTVU News by the hundreds-of-thousands if it installed a right-wing bent to the news. Murdoch & Co. have always maintained a firewall between Fox News and his other divisions. If anything, the Fox network is more daring than the other Bigs - pushing the line of censorship in regard to content. Same with FX and FXX. Fox Searchlight pictures finances some excellent and daring independent films. And there's still 20th Century Fox making mainstream theatrical films. I don't think they want viewers associating Fox News with the other divisions.
 
Murdoch & Co. have always maintained a firewall between Fox News and his other divisions.

I agree. Even when they syndicate news content to the affiliates, it's straight news, like a Cavuto business report. I've never seen them require an editorial on their stations.
 
I agree. Even when they syndicate news content to the affiliates, it's straight news, like a Cavuto business report. I've never seen them require an editorial on their stations.

Yes I agree too. When Fox News has to provide news content for their O&O's and affiliates during elections and breaking news its usually Shepard Smith and Chris Wallace that takes on the lead for breaking news if it requires a national talent to take charge of covering the event. Or in some cases like KTVU the breaking news is done by the local O&O talent and Fox News provides the video.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom