Re: So... (try this) WHAT???!!????
> > Dislike IBOC if you want. But EDUCATE yourself on what it
>
> > is and how it works.
>
> A little bit of respect for your fellow engineers will yield
> better results than insults.
Fair enough, and I applogize. I just see so much MISinformation running around!
>
> IBOC is new to everybody. I just knew that the station shut
> off RDS, and assumed it was incompatibility, the same as AM
> IBOC is not compatible with C-Quam. I mean - bad
> engineering on the AM band might - and probably does -
> translate to bad engineering on FM. They obsolete a
> perfectly good AM stereo system in use in hundreds of
> thousands - perhaps still millions of vehicles, so why not
> obsolete SCA, RDS, teletext for deaf on FM subchannels:
> services still
> used, but by FAR fewer listeners than are capable of hearing
> C-Quam.
I am a fan of AM Stereo. I woul d hate to see it go away.
As far as FM goes there is no incompatibility between analog and IBOC. Everything that works in the past will work now. I have one FM that is running the Microsoft SCA and running HD Radio. RDS still works as well.
>
> > Dont get me wrong I am not a huge supporter of iBiqity or
> > IBOC. But it is a technology that we need to learn about.
>
>
> Agreed. But the whole thing looks set to self-implode. I
> wouldn't put any money into it until it is clear that
> consumers will accept it.
And that will take time. This needs to bake out quite a bit yet. Come summer I am sure we will see more awareness.
>
> > OH THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
>
> Wasn't chicken little right in the latest movie? Every
> single prediction I made about HDTV over 15 years ago has
> come true.
>
> > FYI most
> > satellite compatible radios are also HD Radio compatible.
>
> I find NONE in Crutchfield.
Here are a few:
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-EE4rSzSNjnH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?wm=fp&I=113EZ900&g=300 (with built in HD Radio receiver!)
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-EE4rSzSNjnH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=300&I=113MP4028
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-EE4rSzSNjnH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=300&I=113MP5028
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-EE4rSzSNjnH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=300&I=113EZ500
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-EE4rSzSNjnH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=300&I=113MP628
And so on...
>
> One thing is for certain - the FCC needs to take another
> look at AM skywave service. Try telling hundreds of
> thousands of hurricane Katrina survivors that nighttime
> skywave service from WWL was (and still is) not important.
> But the ability of local AM talk stations to have
> commercials and musical bed in digital stereo at night is
> more important than vital information about their home town.
>
I dont think that is what is being said at all. People are looking for ways to improve the AM service. I still think that AM stereo is the way to go. This all needs to be baked out again. We are far from having a completed solution.