• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Saga rebrands translators as “metro signals” and more baloney from Strubie

Looks like Sage Communications is trying to get rid of the stench of the misnomer "HD" by calling translators by a different name.

"Translator-based stations fed off HD2 and HD3 channels have been all the rage in radio during the past year, with new stations signing on and many getting decent ratings for a signal with 250 watts or less. But the word translator and call signs like K260AM (otherwise known as Des Moines CHR “Hits 99.9”) can be difficult for advertisers to grasp. So Saga Communications is doing a bit of off-air rebranding.
Rather than market the stations as “translators,” it’s now calling them “metro signals” when salespeople present them to advertisers. “It improves their reception and makes them sound more legitimate,” CEO Ed Christian says. Saga was an early adopter of creating free-standing stations on translators and HD signals, helped by operating in smaller markets where translators were a bit easier to come by. Today it owns about three dozen, many of which are simulcasting AMs and Class A FMs. “We’re doing very well with these,” Christian says."

And Strubie loath to pass up any distortion or obsfucation that will confuse the public embraces the idea while "while the industry waits for (HD) receiver penetration to grow"
To this writer it looks like Strubie is finally admitting in print that the only use for HD (besides 3 or 4 posters here in this forum) is for translaters, woops I mean metro signals.

"Ibiquity says over the past two years, two-thirds of digital radio conversions have been to take advantage of a translator, most often in small and mid-sized markets. CEO Bob Struble wrote in an online column last week that the combination makes spending several thousand dollars to install HD Radio technology seem more worthwhile while the industry waits for receiver penetration to grow. “Translators are like training wheels that allow a seamless transition from analog to digital while bringing listeners along for the ride,” Struble said."

From Inside Radio

http://www.insideradio.com//Article.asp?id=2692638#.Uh7-ExushcY
 

There's one of these in the Sacramento Valley -- Sunny 95.5 (aka. KYCY 103.1 HD2). It's been on the air for about a year now. I'm not sure how it's doing but it's certainly sounds like a full blown FM station.

Them loophole on 250w translators was for "fill in" coverage for HD2's, right? It was never intended to assist listeners in a seamless transition from analog to digital, right?
 
e421.jpg


Here we have Strubie demonstrating one of his new HD cameras which are said (by him) to be a vast improvement over the ordinary analog camera. They do have a few flaws however: You must be within 20 ft of your subject and new photos colors' bleed over their two adjacent photos, depite these two flaws Strubie predicts a strong future for the HD camera.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom