• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Senate Watergate Hearings Coverage in 1973: Day-by-Day Breakdown of Networks

While I was way too young to remember, isn't it possible some in the Republican Party might not have considered broadcast of the Watergate hearings to be in the public interest?

As for your comment that Republicans would not have found network coverage of the proceedings to serve the public, that's nothing more than a case of reading into history our present-day political animosities. Sure, Nixon and the Administration didn't like it. Sure, the Republicans in Congress would have done everything they could to prevent it. But if the atmosphere that prevails now on Capitol Hill and in the White House had carried the day then, there would have been no Watergate hearings to start with. Besides, network news departments had a much stronger firewall than today against pressure from their employers and the Government to curtail news reporting unfavorable to a particular party (that has pretty much gone by the wayside now, swept away by the triumph of cable news and the Internet and the fiercely competitive media world). If the FCC had become aware of such attempts at censorship, it would have strongly warned the networks and broadcasters not to comply, for fear of violating things like the Fairness Doctrine, which was abolished in 1987. From another perspective, it would have amounted to political suicide for a Republican legislator to come out publicly against the networks carrying the hearings (While this may sound overly political, Vice-President Agnew and Press Secretary Ron Ziegler had already cried wolf far too many times against supposed ideological bias and slanted reporting on the networks' part; many Americans, even conservatives, had tuned them out by this time). Whatever we think about the matter today, the consensus among broadcasters, the public, and even advertisers was that broadcasting the proceedings took precedence over all political and economic considerations. We were, in other words, a far less cynical, more respectful society than is even possible nowadays.

What you have to remember is the Republican party of 1973 was nothing like the party of today. Senator Barry Goldwater, the gold standard of Conservative thinking at the time, wanted Nixon's head on a stick as did many Republicans at the time because they recognized the abuse of power. If was only from within the administration that fired accusations of bias; that is where we get the term "a non-denial denial". You're not denying what was done but you will question the messenger's canine heritage, or lack there of.

Speaking of Goldwater, John Dean seek the advice of Goldwater before going in front of Congress. Dean was torn between betraying his boss or facing contempt and disbarment. Goldwater's advice was simple, "The Son of a Bitch lied, hang him". There was also a story of a private meeting between Goldwater and Nixon at the oval office. Goldwater made it clear to Nixon that he would be impeached, days later Nixon resigned.

The morale of the story, if Nixon had Mitch McConnell, the Republican party as defined today, Fox News, Rush and the rest of the pundits he probably would have gotten away with it.
 
anotherguy said:
Concerning kid's shows being pre-empted for government hearings, something worse I can remember happening was during the Senate hearings for Clarence Thomas being nominated for the Supreme Court, when Anita Hill testified against him and made her accusations, part of which was on a Saturday morning, and pre-empted kid's shows on the big 3 networks. I wasn't married or a parent at the time but to me this was totally inexcusable.

I remember Peter Jennings cautioning parents that they might want to send their kids out of the room, since some of the language was, as he put it, "not very nice."

Back to Watergate: one Republican senator who stuck with Nixon to the bitter end was Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. The night Nixon announced his resignation (August 8, 1974) Thurmond, on CBS, was effusive about Nixon; Roger Mudd point-blank asked, "Well, Senator, if he was so wonderful, why did he have to resign?".
 
Mike Stroud said:
...
Now, as for your argument that the need to inform the public must be balanced against the FCC's mandate that children's needs be attended to,...

...As for your comment that Republicans would not have found network coverage of the proceedings to serve the public,...

I do want to make it clear I'm not necessarily posting my positions -- I'm suggesting that's how some in the industry might have felt -- or felt the regulators would believe -- at the time. 1973 Republicans might not have been horribly unhappy that Nixon was getting hung on TV, but would they have caused problems for broadcasters who *didn't* help hang Nixon? (that's a question, not a statement :) )
 
radiorob2.0 said:
While I was way too young to remember, isn't it possible some in the Republican Party might not have considered broadcast of the Watergate hearings to be in the public interest?

As for your comment that Republicans would not have found network coverage of the proceedings to serve the public, that's nothing more than a case of reading into history our present-day political animosities. Sure, Nixon and the Administration didn't like it. Sure, the Republicans in Congress would have done everything they could to prevent it. But if the atmosphere that prevails now on Capitol Hill and in the White House had carried the day then, there would have been no Watergate hearings to start with. Besides, network news departments had a much stronger firewall than today against pressure from their employers and the Government to curtail news reporting unfavorable to a particular party (that has pretty much gone by the wayside now, swept away by the triumph of cable news and the Internet and the fiercely competitive media world). If the FCC had become aware of such attempts at censorship, it would have strongly warned the networks and broadcasters not to comply, for fear of violating things like the Fairness Doctrine, which was abolished in 1987. From another perspective, it would have amounted to political suicide for a Republican legislator to come out publicly against the networks carrying the hearings (While this may sound overly political, Vice-President Agnew and Press Secretary Ron Ziegler had already cried wolf far too many times against supposed ideological bias and slanted reporting on the networks' part; many Americans, even conservatives, had tuned them out by this time). Whatever we think about the matter today, the consensus among broadcasters, the public, and even advertisers was that broadcasting the proceedings took precedence over all political and economic considerations. We were, in other words, a far less cynical, more respectful society than is even possible nowadays.

What you have to remember is the Republican party of 1973 was nothing like the party of today. Senator Barry Goldwater, the gold standard of Conservative thinking at the time, wanted Nixon's head on a stick as did many Republicans at the time because they recognized the abuse of power. If was only from within the administration that fired accusations of bias; that is where we get the term "a non-denial denial". You're not denying what was done but you will question the messenger's canine heritage, or lack there of.

Speaking of Goldwater, John Dean seek the advice of Goldwater before going in front of Congress. Dean was torn between betraying his boss or facing contempt and disbarment. Goldwater's advice was simple, "The Son of a Bitch lied, hang him". There was also a story of a private meeting between Goldwater and Nixon at the oval office. Goldwater made it clear to Nixon that he would be impeached, days later Nixon resigned.

The morale of the story, if Nixon had Mitch McConnell, the Republican party as defined today, Fox News, Rush and the rest of the pundits he probably would have gotten away with it.

Your last paragraph is absolute hogwash. No one that has any knowledge of history can make a statement like that with a straight face.
 
FRR said:
radiorob2.0 said:
While I was way too young to remember, isn't it possible some in the Republican Party might not have considered broadcast of the Watergate hearings to be in the public interest?

As for your comment that Republicans would not have found network coverage of the proceedings to serve the public, that's nothing more than a case of reading into history our present-day political animosities. Sure, Nixon and the Administration didn't like it. Sure, the Republicans in Congress would have done everything they could to prevent it. But if the atmosphere that prevails now on Capitol Hill and in the White House had carried the day then, there would have been no Watergate hearings to start with. Besides, network news departments had a much stronger firewall than today against pressure from their employers and the Government to curtail news reporting unfavorable to a particular party (that has pretty much gone by the wayside now, swept away by the triumph of cable news and the Internet and the fiercely competitive media world). If the FCC had become aware of such attempts at censorship, it would have strongly warned the networks and broadcasters not to comply, for fear of violating things like the Fairness Doctrine, which was abolished in 1987. From another perspective, it would have amounted to political suicide for a Republican legislator to come out publicly against the networks carrying the hearings (While this may sound overly political, Vice-President Agnew and Press Secretary Ron Ziegler had already cried wolf far too many times against supposed ideological bias and slanted reporting on the networks' part; many Americans, even conservatives, had tuned them out by this time). Whatever we think about the matter today, the consensus among broadcasters, the public, and even advertisers was that broadcasting the proceedings took precedence over all political and economic considerations. We were, in other words, a far less cynical, more respectful society than is even possible nowadays.

What you have to remember is the Republican party of 1973 was nothing like the party of today. Senator Barry Goldwater, the gold standard of Conservative thinking at the time, wanted Nixon's head on a stick as did many Republicans at the time because they recognized the abuse of power. If was only from within the administration that fired accusations of bias; that is where we get the term "a non-denial denial". You're not denying what was done but you will question the messenger's canine heritage, or lack there of.

Speaking of Goldwater, John Dean seek the advice of Goldwater before going in front of Congress. Dean was torn between betraying his boss or facing contempt and disbarment. Goldwater's advice was simple, "The Son of a Bitch lied, hang him". There was also a story of a private meeting between Goldwater and Nixon at the oval office. Goldwater made it clear to Nixon that he would be impeached, days later Nixon resigned.

The morale of the story, if Nixon had Mitch McConnell, the Republican party as defined today, Fox News, Rush and the rest of the pundits he probably would have gotten away with it.

Your last paragraph is absolute hogwash. No one that has any knowledge of history can make a statement like that with a straight face.

Senator Mitch McConnell, and the whole Republican party today for that matter, has a "party over country" mentality. The same can be said about Fox News, Rush and the rest. They turned the GOP into a snake oil show with elements of a sham televangelist and that is a shame. Back then the party went after one of its own because it's was the right thing to do. Today that very party would go above and beyond the call of duty to justify the action and that is the problem.

Barry Goldwater was a conservative but, like his contemporaries of the time, was country first. Keep in mind if you took away the paranoia Nixon was a reasonable president and did things that the modern day Republican party would label him a damn, dirty, liberal today.
 
bpatrick said:
I remember Peter Jennings cautioning parents that they might want to send their kids out of the room, since some of the language was, as he put it, "not very nice."

And when tapes of the President Clinton grand jury testimony were broadcast (at the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal), I think Dan Rather made a Teletubbies reference as a verbal disclaimer at the beginning; dunno how Jennings and/or Tom Brokaw (or Peter Mansbridge or Lloyd Robertson up in Canada) warned their viewers.
 
Ultimajock:

While Hawaii's TV stations did not have their own satellite downlinks in 1973, the state did have a satellite uplink/downlink owned or otherwise connected to Comsat or Intelsat which probably had direct landline links to Honolulu's TV stations, allowing occasional major live TV events to be broadcast live by satellite.

I would think some of the Watergate hearings (especially John Dean's testimony) would be one example; the World Series and Super Bowl might have been other examples. In the Watergate case, if any live-by-satellite coverage was fed to Hawaii, it probably was pool coverage.
 
Al Timiter said:
IIRC, President Nixon suggested a national health-care system.

Fine comments, all, but let's be careful here and not veer this into a political rant/blog. This is about TV's handling of major historical events and the changes in technology and the business that enabled them to be brought into American living rooms (and in some cases, offices and restaurants).

Myself, I see the Watergate Senate hearings as something of a bridge between the networks' first attempts at wall-to-wall coverage in the Army-McCarthy hearings in the Spring of '54 and Brian Lamb's launching of C-SPAN in 1979. Live remotes from Capitol Hill, multiple reporters assigned to the story, anchors working the equivalent of a full shift each day--those things really tested the networks' mettle and resources. I bet you even money Lamb paid detailed attention to everything that happened during the Spring of '73--all the camera angles, the anchor patterns (note NBC's use of no less than three--Utley, Newman, Chancellor), the slip-ups, and all that. In other words, Sam Ervin and co. were a test case for the development of Big Brother in the hallowed halls and chambers of the grand old dome.
 
A comment on the networks' changed attitude toward news between
1954 and 1973: in '73 ABC, CBS, and NBC all carried the Ervin committee
hearings (even if most days they rotated coverage) and PBS replayed them
in primetime. In 1954 only ABC and DuMont, with little or no daytime
programming, carried the McCarthy hearings; neither CBS nor NBC felt it worth
it to pre-empt their soaps and other daytime shows. And I wonder if any of them
showed the Kefauver hearings into organized crime in 1951.
 
bpatrick said:
A comment on the networks' changed attitude toward news between 1954 and 1973: in '73 ABC, CBS, and NBC all carried the
Ervin committee hearings (even if most days they rotated coverage) and PBS replayed them in primetime. In 1954 only ABC and
DuMont, with little or no daytime programming, carried the McCarthy hearings; neither CBS nor NBC felt it worth it to pre-empt
their soaps and other daytime shows. And I wonder if any of them showed the Kefauver hearings into organized crime in 1951.

From what I remember about the Kefauver hearings, it was a local TV station - WPIX Channel 11 in New York - that originated such coverage (indeed, it helped make the then three-year-old station's reputation), and some other stations across the country carried what Channel 11 emanated.
 
In our house, the Senate Watergate Committee Hearings re-play on PBS was THE #1 prime-time show. Our whole family, which included college aged-kids, was glued to it. I've also collected all the novelty/comedy records that came out during that time. "Haldeman, Erhlichman, Mitchell and Dean", a barbershop quartet record by "The Creep"- as in Committee to Re-Elect the President" got the most airplay. "The Nixorcist" while being a little overwrought had some funny lines, such as the Nixon character yelling at the excorcist... "Peace with honor, peace with honor, I'll give you a piece with honor!"
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom