I am curious about something. (maybe this is happening already)...Would radio stations (and tv) lose a lot of money if the host of the show did some free advertising to help boost the economy? I know a station has to sell advertisments, but it would only take a few seconds for the host to say (for example)..."We here at KDKA are very concerned about the economy, so were are providing as a courtesy a list of auto dealers participating in President Obama's "Cash For Clunkers" Program." (or something of that nature). It only takes a few seconds and people know the station is doing it's part to help turn the situation around.
I also noticed there are a lot of "celebrities" doing radio (and tv) commercials for cars, and other various products to help our economy. I don't think it would hurt the celebrity to spend a couple of hours recording (or filming) the advertisment without getting paid for it. I have noticed a lot of celebrities have been dropped from product endorsements (Tiger Woods from Ford). This would also show that the individual celebrity (ie..Tiger) is doing his part to help.
I was just curious...
Thanks,
Stuart
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
I also noticed there are a lot of "celebrities" doing radio (and tv) commercials for cars, and other various products to help our economy. I don't think it would hurt the celebrity to spend a couple of hours recording (or filming) the advertisment without getting paid for it. I have noticed a lot of celebrities have been dropped from product endorsements (Tiger Woods from Ford). This would also show that the individual celebrity (ie..Tiger) is doing his part to help.
I was just curious...
Thanks,
Stuart
Chapel Hill, North Carolina