In addition to talking about gun control, the real issue here is about career criminals on the street, the lack of working rehabilitation programs and prosecutors who release hardened criminals back onto the streets. Both subjects need to be discussed in tandem.
I believe that the two subjects have to be taken in tandem.That is not "the real" issue. I agree 100% that what you say about career criminals, catch and release policies, etc. being major problems but I disagree with your verbiage which seeks to downplay the issue of guns. If you want to prioritize them, the gun problem is still #1. Issues #2, 3 and 4 would not exist without it.
I believe that the two subjects have to be taken in tandem.
The problem on radio and TV is that there are vocal anti-gun pundits and excessive pro-let's-buy-a-tank commentators and no middle ground of safe but regulated gun ownership proponents. Not everyone should own a gun, and those that do... like driver licenses... should have to re-qualify regularly. Is that so hard for the two extremes to accept? And why are no media commentators espousing that position?I agree, I just couldn't stand to let that previous remark hang out there as phrased above, as if guns aren't a real issue. So I'm happy it's clarified and I'm going to bow out now since no one is going to win a gun debate on a radio forum, and there's not much more i can say about the tragedy with this reporter and the others, SMH.
The problem on radio and TV is that there are vocal anti-gun pundits and excessive pro-let's-buy-a-tank commentators and no middle ground of safe but regulated gun ownership proponents. Not everyone should own a gun, and those that do... like driver licenses... should have to re-qualify regularly. Is that so hard for the two extremes to accept? And why are no media commentators espousing that position?
It's not just media commentators. It's insane MAGA legislators. They really do want unlimited guns for every man, woman and child in all places at all times with no restrictions whatsoever. The way my state is trying to "nullify".federal laws, I imagine at some point we will have no federal background checks. Our legislature is voting on unlimited guns on college campuses, and lowering the permitless carry age to 18. Missouri just voted down a bill to ban teenagers from carrying. MAGAs tell me that gun owners are either a) perfectly patriotic, law-abiding citizens or (black) criminals. Then the news is filled with road rage shootings, domestic violence shootings (my state now passes bills that say domestic abusers can have guns). The mass shooters are white guys. They say unlimited guns protects from tyranny. What about the tyranny of knowing you could be shot going to the store, a concert, a sports event or any public area. So I'm at a restaurant and I'm supposed to assume a guy with an AR15 strapped to him is just showing off, instead of having his last meal before he goes on a rampage. If Marjorie Taylor Greene ever gets her separate nation (being echoed in the public airwaves by Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity), I guess we all carry guns at all times (I have several reasons for not wanting to own a gun; knowing I can be careless and very occasional suicide ideation). But if I have to live in the Wild West to own the libs........The problem on radio and TV is that there are vocal anti-gun pundits and excessive pro-let's-buy-a-tank commentators and no middle ground of safe but regulated gun ownership proponents. Not everyone should own a gun, and those that do... like driver licenses... should have to re-qualify regularly. Is that so hard for the two extremes to accept? And why are no media commentators espousing that position?