• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Sports Talk Hosts Going off on Tangents

@CTListener I don't mean to sound like I'm challenging your comment, 'cause I'm not - but I'm curious if this is a statistic you've actually seen data on or if it was just an off the cuff comment? Curious as I can see that "over 50" viewer comment being true for some sports like baseball, but for other sports like Basketball, when I look in the stands or go to a sports bar to watch a game, the crowd is quite obviously skewing much younger than 50.
If you do a search you'll get varied results but MLB Baseball's median fan age is around 54 or so, NFL is 45-50, Basketball is younger, maybe around 35-40. Hockey is somewhere in between NFL and MLB.
 
Sports talk is guy talk. It happens to mostly be sports. But sports is not a self-contained bubble that has no interactions with the rest of life. It’s ok for hosts to inject other content when at times it may be more engaging than what’s happening…or not happening…with the local sports scene that has been covered repeatedly.

Maybe that “tangent” is not of interest to you. Great. It may well be of interest to other listeners who like sports but can converse about more than one topic.
 
If you do a search you'll get varied results but MLB Baseball's median fan age is around 54 or so, NFL is 45-50, Basketball is younger, maybe around 35-40. Hockey is somewhere in between NFL and MLB.
Just to clarify, I was referring to the average age of those leagues' television viewers, not all people who say they're fans of the leagues or the sports. Here's an article that says the average Sunday NFL viewer is over 55. Since this is a broadcasting board, that's a number that should be of primary interest. The couch potatoes are aging rapidly. Will the advertisers view that trend negatively?
 
Just to clarify, I was referring to the average age of those leagues' television viewers, not all people who say they're fans of the leagues or the sports. Here's an article that says the average Sunday NFL viewer is over 55. Since this is a broadcasting board, that's a number that should be of primary interest. The couch potatoes are aging rapidly. Will the advertisers view that trend negatively?
Understood. And the websites where I got my figures were TV broadcast based, because the broadcast demo stats are more heavily researched.

I sincerely doubt that NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB teams measure the age of every single person who goes to the actual games. Maybe they have stats on season ticketholders, maybe not.

The TV demos are fairly well researched. And TV probably counts more than fans in the stands for many teams, anyway. When the Seahawks or Mariners play, one can guarantee that there a maybe 100K-200K more fans in sports pubs watching the game on TV, or fans watching at home, either way they're more populous than the 60K who are at the stadium. And the ads presented at the stadium itself probably don't bring in as much revenue as TV.
 
One sports podcast I listen to is about college sports. One of the hosts only listens to Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix and Pink Floyd and watches Rockford Files and Andy Griffith like it's his job. The other two hosts, who are older than him, goof on him for not listening to or watching anything that isn't 50-60 years old, other than live sports. He doesn't even do that, since he admits to falling asleep watching games. He also constantly interrupts guests and seemingly never prepares for interviews, because he asks long winded rambling questions like he's coming up with them on the fly. He also can't handle even mild criticism from anyone, which is funny, since he seems to think only the music and tv shows he watches and listens to is the best of all time.

If it weren't for the guests and some callers, plus the knowledge of one of the other hosts, I probably wouldn't listen.
 
Last edited:
Some of the national hosts talk about the games, the players, and the like. Ben Maller seems to keep it lively without veering too far into off-sports territory. I don't listen to the local Sports talk hosts, so I've no idea how they operate. I have heard betting talk on the national sports talk shows, although it's usually just part of the segment. On his night-time show on CBS Sports Radio, Scott Ferrall used to talk about sports betting long before it became a big deal.
 
Some of the national hosts talk about the games, the players, and the like. Ben Maller seems to keep it lively without veering too far into off-sports territory. I don't listen to the local Sports talk hosts, so I've no idea how they operate. I have heard betting talk on the national sports talk shows, although it's usually just part of the segment. On his night-time show on CBS Sports Radio, Scott Ferrall used to talk about sports betting long before it became a big deal.
I enjoy Ben Maller, though he does get into politics every once in awhile and I like some of the Infinity Sports Network hosts like JR, Jody Mac, Dave Smith and Ryan Hickey.
 
There are many women sportscasters on radio and TV, but so few women call into sports talk radio stations. Would it benefit those stations to modify their approach to attract more women listeners?
 
There is an afternoon drive time sports program in Buffalo N.Y. that at one time was a fun and creative few hours of entertainment. Their producer moved on to a different career, and the quality of the program dropped significantly. I would think a program director or producer could also 'make or break' a show's appeal, depending upon how much control the host(s) have over the program.
 
I would think a program director or producer could also 'make or break' a show's appeal, depending upon how much control the host(s) have over the program.

One would think that, but it's not always the case. In today's radio world, the talent often has a lot of power. It's usually spelled out in the talent contract. Ultimately the GM has control. PDs and producers will often just support and assist the talent. The amount of host control will have to do with longevity and involvement in sponsorship.
 


Back
Top Bottom