• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The end of the world and I feel fine

I

initec

Guest
After war of the worlds the fcc made rules to prevent mass hysteria from broadcasters.

What about family radio proclaiming the end of the world. Could/should the FCC step in and take the stations licenses away??
 
This topic has been discussed elsewhere.

1) I haven't noticed any "mass hysteria." Certainly not to the level that took place in 1939.

2) Harold Camping made this announcement believing it was true.

3) About the only thing the FCC can do is levy a fine.
 
TheBigA said:
This topic has been discussed elsewhere.

1) I haven't noticed any "mass hysteria." Certainly not to the level that took place in 1939.

2) Harold Camping made this announcement believing it was true.

3) About the only thing the FCC can do is levy a fine.

What do you think BigA, fine of about 70M-120M?
 
Did anybody complain to the FCC yet? No complaint, no action.

If there is a complaint, I doubt that the FCC will take any meaningful action because of the First Amendment. Cite FCC rules all you want. They don't supercede the Constitution, and nobody wants to take this through the courts. Well, OK, nobody but the lawyers who'd be racking up billable hours.
 
What I find more alarming than any kooky prediction, is how an organization such as Mr. Camping runs, operates and expands by essentially scaring people into giving him money. Is it illegal? Nope. Is it immoral? Perhaps, but as someone else pointed out here, by all indications this guy actually believes the delusions and has his fair share of followers.

Moreover, I was concerned about the potential for residual consequenses; i.e., those who were so convinced that Camping was right, that they could harm themselves if the rapture didn't occur (Jim Jones comes to mind). Fringe religious "leaders" such as Mr. Camping seem innocent enough, but history has shown there is real potential danger involved when it comes to embedding human emotion and belief structures. None of these "leaders" or self proclaimed profits in the past, at least that I'm aware of, have had large radio networks to prey (not pray), upon the simple members in society.

My hope, but doubt somehow, that for those who (stupidly) gave away their life savings or personal goods in advance of Mr. Camping's predictions, will file a class action against Mr. Camping and his organization making him think twice, before he has an opportunity to continue this insanity and potentially ruin more lives, or worse.
 
Kind of interesting that the Family radio stations in Maryland (renewal due June 1)--filed their renewal applications end of last week. Apparently someone in the organization believes the world won't end on October 21, either.
 
TVradioguru said:
What I find more alarming than any kooky prediction, is how an organization such as Mr. Camping runs, operates and expands by essentially scaring people into giving him money. Is it illegal? Nope. Is it immoral? Perhaps, but as someone else pointed out here, by all indications this guy actually believes the delusions and has his fair share of followers.

A cynic could follow your observation with the claim that more than half the churches in our country operate and expand by "essentially scaring people into giving money".

In how many houses of worship will the man stand behind the pulpit this Sunday and plead with people to walk down the aisle and make a decision on the basis that "if you die in a car wreck on the way home tonight, you will spend eternity in hell if you do not make that choice today!"

Is that significantly different than what Camping does in his operation?

This whole thing of not having government step in and dictate our religion to us does get messy sometimes. BUT, things in Europe were pretty messy back in the days when Luther and Calvin shook things up five centuries ago... Burning people "at the stake" was not what we today would call a "Sunday School Picnic."
 
I've often said the two easiest ways to get money from someone is either promise them sex or salvation. Those two things, if you look at it, are the basis for much of what we do on this earth. The topics of most popular music address those two topics. Most advertising is about those two topics. So you have Mr. Camping on one side, and Mr. Heffner on the other. Both seem pretty successful at what they do.
 
I agree, but I don't believe the teachings of Mr. Hefner ever caused people to take their own lives or put themselves into poverty.

Now granted some would argue that if someone was stupid enough to hand over their life savings because of something heard on the radio, they deserve what they get. To me, Camping's ramblings and predictions to the simple folks in society are bordering on criminal manipulation. Was what Jim Jones did in convincing his followers to kill themselves considered criminal by todays standards? I believe it would be, in spite of the fact they didn't directly perish by Jones hand.

Last I heard there were at least four people who took their own lives because of Camping's errant prediction via radio. Was Camping directly responsible? No more than Jim Jones was. The question in my mind is, how many more predictions will Camping make and how many more trusting followers will be in poverty, or worse before the Justice Department investigates?
 
TVradioguru said:
I agree, but I don't believe the teachings of Mr. Hefner ever caused people to take their own lives or put themselves into poverty.

I gather you've never had a friend or in-law end up going to a Betty Ford Center type place in search of rehab from Sexual Addiction.
 
No I haven't, but your attempt at comparison is, to say the least, a stretch.

Nudity and sexually-based media production is not exclusive to Hugh Hefner. Using a large government-licensed network of radio stations to regularly predict the end of the world and bilk (one could argue 'ignorant') innocent people out of their life savings is exclusive to Mr. Camping.
 
TVradioguru said:
Using a large government-licensed network of radio stations to regularly predict the end of the world and bilk (one could argue 'ignorant') innocent people out of their life savings is exclusive to Mr. Camping.

Only this particular date. I suggest that on any given day, you'll hear hundreds of radio preachers predicting the end of the world. This is not a unique thing.
 
TVradioguru said:
No I haven't, but your attempt at comparison is, to say the least, a stretch.

Nudity and sexually-based media production is not exclusive to Hugh Hefner. Using a large government-licensed network of radio stations to regularly predict the end of the world and bilk (one could argue 'ignorant') innocent people out of their life savings is exclusive to Mr. Camping.

I don't care where you live, not far from you there will be at least ONE preacher and church (and he/she may or may not be on the radio) proclaiming a corrupted version of Christianity designed to peel the cash right out of wallets and purses. Mr. Camping just happens to have a slightly larger bull-horn than many of them. Some of the TV preachers have an even larger bull-horn. Camping is far from being unique or one-of-a-kind. The American spirit of entrepreneur-ism has found it's way into the uniquely American expression of Christianity. I am not a defender of Mr. Camping... but I am a defender of following the constitutional mandate that our government not get into the business of anointing one expression of religious thought while putting the squelch on another expression.

The BigA waxed eloquently that offering sex or salvation are efficient ways to get people's money in your hands. And you set about to "debunk" his claim by suggesting that no one ever took their life or lost their savings due to Hugh Hefner. Maybe not, but there are purveyors of sex that can and will. I trudged around this earth for a long time without knowing that there is a distinct definition of "Sexual Addiction" and if you are a professional and lose your licensing because a licensing board declares you to be a "Sexual Addict" incapable of living up to the standards of your profession, you may not end up in "the poor house" but your wallet will be devastated.

So are you prepared to give Hugh Hefner a pat on the back while wanting to have government disassemble Harold Camping?
 
Promising something to someone who gives you their life savings is fraud, plain and simple. But, since you're so quick to defend a "Christian radio" preacher bilking people out of their life savings or potentially their lives, would you also defend the likes of someone like Jim Jones? Had we seen a warning, should the Justice Department have intervened before many lost their lives at Jonestown? Or do you protect Jones from prosecution too specifically because of his association with religion? As pointed out earlier, I fail to see the difference between Camping and Jones, other than Camping uses radio to spread his form of fraud.
 
TVradioguru said:
But, since you're so quick to defend a "Christian radio" preacher bilking people out of their life savings or potentially their lives, would you also defend the likes of someone like Jim Jones? Had we seen a warning, should the Justice Department have intervened before many lost their lives at Jonestown?

Your understanding of what i am protecting, what I am protesting, differs from how a view my stance. Thus, I have a problem. I need to express my view so that we can see my view the same way. That does not mean that you will agree with my view... it means we will both accurately understand how we differ.

If Camping had relocated to parts of Idaho or Montana where there is room for non-standard people to find themselves a sanctuary... or maybe The Ozarks of northern Arkansas which through the years has provided space where wack-a-doodles await some spectacle-of-the-universe event, then I would look more favorably on your comparison of Camping and Jones. David Koresh gathered his followers in a compound near Waco and there is apparently some evidence that the fire that took placed when the compound was raided was a suicide action by Koresh. I can see comparing Koresh and Jones.

I am not a defender of radio preachers. I once ran a preach-and-teach radio station with wall-to-wall programming by Chrisitan ministers and groups. I was up to my belly-button in "Gospel Yackers". If you were to go back and read every thing I have posted on Radio-Info through the years and watch for the subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) comments, you will note that I am not a friend of radio preachers as we know them today.

Part of the founding of this country was, of course, entrepreneurial. Europeans looking for a place where colonies could make them some serious bucks. Their plan worked because there was a ready supply people eager to populate such colonies in order to escape European communities where religious belief and flavor were dictated by the government... in a somewhat civilized version of third-world countries today where the term "war lord" is in vogue.

When these pilgrims, these immigrants, these refugees came here they first tried to create settlements favorable to their own beliefs. Collectively they soon realized they were on the verge of creating "Europe Junior" when it came to jamming religion down people throats, so they established a concept of giving religious thought a freedom to roam, to range, to be what it wanted to be when it grew up.

Today we are facing those issues all over again. There is this "orange haze" in our thinking that religious freedom is great as long as you want to be a Protestant, a Catholic or a Jew. But when you go down to city hall and apply for a permit to build something where people will gather to study and worship as a Hindu, a Muslim, a Buddhist... and in some commuities, as a Mormon, all hell breaks loose. People show up at city council meetings with hand lettered posters and a lot of angry shouting. If we tolerate this and encourage this, in the coming years mobs will show up to protest the establishment of a Baptist Church that is part of the wrong Baptist Church, or the wrong Catholic order, or the wrong branch of Judaism.

If Camping has violated laws regulating fraud, do what is happening to John Edwards: let the prosecutors take him to court. Not because his theology is bad... but because he broke the fraud laws the same way a hearing-aid salesman might commit fraud; the same way a quack doctor submits phony Medicaid claims and commits fraud.

I dug my heels in on this topic because so many in the various forums about Camping are expressing themselves in a way that indicates they want to tar-and-feather him because he has non-standard theology. Fine! Let's go after Mike Huckabee and Pat Robertson and Tim LaHaye because they have bad theology when it comes to end-times theology. No, I don't think so. Go after anyone who while "wearing the garb of the church and religion" commits fraud, not those who commit bad theology. Other than being presumptuous and setting a date, most of what Camping teaches matches up with what is taught in accredited theological seminaries across the country.

If you want to "see the fur flying" start a campaign to shut down college and seminaries that teach bad theology. ::) And the gist of our conversations in these forums is that the FCC is vanguard that should kick off this campaign.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom