From a prior post:Bill Scull did a great job for Renda, but he got a raw deal, so that's life. I guess none of us will ever know the true story. Perhaps Mr. Scull did not have a choice with on-air talent or programmer. But one thing is certain. From a listening perspective there was one disaster after the next. I think most of us expect some format glitches when something new is launched. If you just look at KOOL, there were on-air issues that lasted for weeks. It seemed, and many of you agreed, that no one in charge was listening to what was going on. How the all-over-the map kind of programming was allowed to continue is beyond me. Yeah, it's easy to sit back and be a Monday morning quarterback, but to me there is no excuse for the continuous bad performance. Doesn't someone have to approve what goes on the air? Specifically sweepers would say one thing about programming and than the tune immediately following would say something else. To me it's all about credibility and there was little of that!And still to this day, the local TV book doesn't have most of it right. WWRR is still listed instead of WKQL. WGNE isn't even listed and WSOS is touted as adult contemporary. Not good. Enough said.As far as Gary Spurgeon is concerned, I must say I'm surprised he's now with Renda. When he lost his job at Cox, I thought surely Renda would miss yet another opportunity. I have this feeling in my gut that he would want (and who can blame him) to give WKQL a complete overhaul into something else. Even if that's the case, I don't believe you can discount Pat Garrett. He shouldn't be looked at as someone who can just program 60s/70s. I have a ton of respect for his work. His attention to detail, desire to win and programming discipline would work to Renda's advantage no matter what the format. That's just my opinion.It will be interesting to see how this all turns out.