A story in today's Arizona Republic has the following quote:
"The typical U.S. household headed by a person age 65 or older has a net worth 47 times greater than a household headed by someone under 35, according to an analysis of census data released Monday."
If true, this is a shattering statistic for advertisers bent on attracting the "young" demo's. I, myself can attest to being in this situation with the premise that my children will never reach my economic level because the same opportunities just are not there in quantity as they were in my day.
In addition, the old adage that seniors can't or don't modify their buying habits seems not to be working as measured by myself and my peers either. It seems to be more a distinction of wealth in seniors versus age alone and advertisers need to reconsider their approach to reaching these people.
I am always trying new restaurants for example, in addition to bringing home new foods that are as far from meat and potatoes as can be. I just bought a new car. It was a brand I had not previously considered and never owned. Who says us seniors are locked into our buying habits?
Those seniors who are still in reasonable health seem not to have a problem leading an active (normal) lifestyle and they have the resources to actually do it. Unless my kids inherit what is left of my estate they most likely will never have the same opportunities and will spend their "golden years" working out of necessity.
The well known stereotype of a senior citizen sitting in a rocking chair on the front porch waiting for the grand kids to come over. None of my peers live that life style and radio is missing the boat if the only demo of importance to them is 25-54. Those of us over 60 still listen to Oldies, Classic Rock and Classic Country. We have the time to listen and we have the money to spend. It's time radio got the message.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/11/07/20111107wealth-gap1107.html
"The typical U.S. household headed by a person age 65 or older has a net worth 47 times greater than a household headed by someone under 35, according to an analysis of census data released Monday."
If true, this is a shattering statistic for advertisers bent on attracting the "young" demo's. I, myself can attest to being in this situation with the premise that my children will never reach my economic level because the same opportunities just are not there in quantity as they were in my day.
In addition, the old adage that seniors can't or don't modify their buying habits seems not to be working as measured by myself and my peers either. It seems to be more a distinction of wealth in seniors versus age alone and advertisers need to reconsider their approach to reaching these people.
I am always trying new restaurants for example, in addition to bringing home new foods that are as far from meat and potatoes as can be. I just bought a new car. It was a brand I had not previously considered and never owned. Who says us seniors are locked into our buying habits?
Those seniors who are still in reasonable health seem not to have a problem leading an active (normal) lifestyle and they have the resources to actually do it. Unless my kids inherit what is left of my estate they most likely will never have the same opportunities and will spend their "golden years" working out of necessity.
The well known stereotype of a senior citizen sitting in a rocking chair on the front porch waiting for the grand kids to come over. None of my peers live that life style and radio is missing the boat if the only demo of importance to them is 25-54. Those of us over 60 still listen to Oldies, Classic Rock and Classic Country. We have the time to listen and we have the money to spend. It's time radio got the message.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/11/07/20111107wealth-gap1107.html