• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Trump Moves To Have Final Say On All FCC Decision-Making

Or instead of going to court, they settle (as ABC recently did, and as CBS is rumored to be considering doing). In that case, legal or not, Trump effectively does have the power.

I'm getting the sense that CBS has changed its mind about settling. Because they say they want the president's personal finances in discovery.


Lawyers representing CBS Broadcasting told a Texas federal court Tuesday they will need President Donald Trump’s personal financial information if his $20 billion lawsuit against the company moves to discovery.

We all know he hates to share that kind of stuff. But if he's claiming his businesses were injured, CBS has the right to see how.
 
I thought when the party that is in power has 3 members that do the president's bidding and pick and choose what rules they want to enforce? I see this going to the courts all the way to the supreme court but the president no matter which party should get final say for rules on The FCC in my opinion. Cenorship and weaponzing is just plain wrong. I hope the courts deny what Trump wants to do and that broadcasters fight and take Trump to court.
 
Some of this Trump stuff I'll see to believe. While I'm entirely no fan of his, I think he does a lot of these theatrics for "spectacle" above all else. I expect little to actually change.
If the first four weeks have not shown that this term is different than the last one, what more evidence does one need? He’s literally doing these things. He’s stocked the administration with the authors of Project 2025 and they are doing precisely what we all warned they would do.
 
I think this week's fcc.today the podcast headline thumbnail says it all:

2025-02-24.png
 
Republicans in congress will probably say nothing, although Trump is clearly usurping legislative authority. He probably assumes the federalists in the courts will let him get away with it. Independent regulatory agencies were created and set-up precisely to be free of this kind of political interference. Included in this group are the Federal Reserve, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and, of course, the FCC. Oh, yes, it also includes Amtrak. Maybe Trump thinks he can make the trains run on time.
Quasi-independent regulatory agencies are a constitutional gray area. They appear to straddle the very clear divide between Article I and Article II powers. The constitution does not describe an institution like this, and it's legitimacy has never been fully explored by the courts. It will be now, and I suspect they'll reassert a very clearly defined barrier between the two.
 

It's well thought out. However, it completely ignores Article II. It's as if congress doesn't exist.

It comes from the monarchical view of government, where the president runs everything. That's not our system.
 
CPB/NPR is cooked for sure now. He'll find a way to get rid of our funding and/or seriously neuter what we can say.

And before anyone says.. "He doesnt have that power" "He can't do that".

Has that stopped him so far?
 
They won't have to. Keep in mind that under the U.S. Constitution, the executive branch is supposed to enforce the laws created by Congress and interpreted by the courts....
Okay, this has gone all political. Please, it you can't involve radio, TV or electronic media, don't post.

I deleted a half dozen posts here.

I know... it is hard to stay out of polarized politics. I even fell off the cliff yesterday in a post I would have deleted if someone else had made it. But unless there is something about radio or TV, it is not a post that belongs here.
 
Okay, this has gone all political. Please, it you can't involve radio, TV or electronic media, don't post.

I deleted a half dozen posts here.

I know... it is hard to stay out of polarized politics. I even fell off the cliff yesterday in a post I would have deleted if someone else had made it. But unless there is something about radio or TV, it is not a post that belongs here.
David, this would be a good time to ask that the FM translators for AM's be made Class A-1. and permanent. It might fly right now.
 
David, this would be a good time to ask that the FM translators for AM's be made Class A-1. and permanent. It might fly right now.
I believe that the LPFM community might oppose this. Michi?

I'm not familiar with the legislation and rules, but there may be a need for rules and legal changes for that to happen. Fybush?
 
It's well thought out. However, it completely ignores Article II. It's as if congress doesn't exist.

It comes from the monarchical view of government, where the president runs everything. That's not our system.
No indeed. It's all kinds of bad, and encompasses much more than the FCC and broadcasting, which is why it's so difficult to stay on track here I think. It's all interrelated, for Congress passed a law that established the FCC, which is also part of the executive branch, so it's almost impossible to discuss FCC policy without discussing those as well. Especially now.

CPB/NPR is cooked for sure now. He'll find a way to get rid of our funding and/or seriously neuter what we can say.

And before anyone says.. "He doesnt have that power" "He can't do that".

Has that stopped him so far?
Nope. So far, this administration has shown little regard for the law, even almost to the point of openly defying the judicial branch, which is a very dangerous red line.

For what it's worth, I hope you can find a way to keep your station on the air somehow if your funding gets cut!

It would require significant Congressional action, because it would upset the balance that was struck when the LCRA was signed into law.

I don't see this Congress right now taking that kind of action.
Neither do I. Congress (primarily the House) has been good for nothing for at least the past three election cycles (maybe more; one could argue that the current level of dysfunction began way back in 2009 when the Republican Tea Partyers came onboard; Obama once called them "the party of no" for a reason (I believe this is a direct quote, but I'm not sure, so take that with an appropriately sized rain of salt)).

Just a year or two ago, it took them thirteen tries to get Mike Johnson elected Speaker. Thirteen votes! They're so dysfunctional, they can't seem to agree on basic and routine stuff!

Anyway, I don't wish for this post to be deleted because of these paragraphs, but if it is, so be it. I understand the need to keep this place sane :) .

If it'll help, I'll try to add something relevant: if the WH gets its way and assumes the power to review all decisions (which seems frightfully likely at this point), do any of you think that it could lead to the possibility of Trump interfering with an ordinary, routine transaction (a license renewal or sale, say) and possibly cancelling it outright if he doesn't like any detail of it for some reason? Or maybe even preemptively revoking licenses for stations that have been targeted by he and his cronies (KCBS, for example). Speaking of KCBS, the whole Audacy and Soros brouhaha comes to mind here....

c
 
If it'll help, I'll try to add something relevant: if the WH gets its way and assumes the power to review all decisions (which seems frightfully likely at this point), do any of you think that it could lead to the possibility of Trump interfering with an ordinary, routine transaction (a license renewal or sale, say) and possibly cancelling it outright if he doesn't like any detail of it for some reason? Or maybe even preemptively revoking licenses for stations that have been targeted by he and his cronies (KCBS, for example).
Yes.

And worse.
 



Here is an extension of the original post AP, Reuters and Huffpost are off the White House Press pool. It's an extension of what the FCC was accused of doing to TV and Radio networks but this time it's from the White House directly going after media outlets.
 
And hey, with the decimation of NOAA/NWS, this move ensures no media outlets will be holding the administration accountable for the guaranteed, assured consequences of their actions which will absolutely result in preventable deaths. The ring-kissing media outlets of the administration’s choosing will most assuredly not do actual journalism.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom