• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

TV shows that were a no-no for some children to watch...

Brooks and Marsh credit Richard Lewis with six shows:
"Anything But Love" (ABC, 1989-92), "A-List" (Comedy
Central, 1992 at least), "Daddy Dearest" (Fox, 1993, where
he co-starred with Don Rickles), "Harry" (ABC, 1987), "Hiller
And Diller" (ABC, 1997-98), and periodic appearances on
Letterman's NBC show. (I also remember him in "Robin Hood:
Men In Tights.") The fact that none of these shows,
with the possible exception of "Anything But Love," had much
of a run, and his appearances on Letterman and "A-List" were
sporadic, hardly put him in the category of a superstar. I think
when most people think of a comedian named "Lewis" it's a
certain individual who once worked with Dean Martin and who
became even better known for his Labor Day Muscular Dystrophy
telethons and that, of course, is Jerry.

Also, a point about "Family Feud." It did, in fact, evolve out of
the bonus round on "Match Game," in which the winner had to
guess the most popular answer given by 100 audience members
to a fill-in-the-blank question. Mark Goodson felt that there was
a game in itself there. The first version, closer to "Match Game,"
was called "Odd Ball": ten contestants in separate isolation booths
competed; if one contestant failed to match at least one other
contestant, s/he was designated the "odd ball" and eliminated from
the game; the game proceeded in this manner until the last two
players played the find-the-most-popular-answer game. That didn't
survive the first run-through, so Goodson changed the name to "Fast
Company," with two celebrity couples (for example, Allen Ludden and
Betty White against Bobby Van and Elaine Joyce). This version more
closely approximated "Feud," but with only two contestants on a side,
they tended to get locked into their first answer and couldn't come up
with the remaining ones. Finally, the number of teammates was extended
to five and a staff member suggested families as the way to unify the teams.
And thus the biggest game-show hit of the '70s was born.
 
Slightly backwards of our topic, if I was in control of the remote when either parent were in the room I would change the channel if a tampon commercial came on. Sounds outlandish now, but it created an awkward moment. :p
 
That's not as funny as you might think; in the 1930s the FCC
got all over CBS for what it perceived as an excess of laxative
commercials (no pun intended, but Ex-Lax was one of CBS's
biggest advertisers on radio). But then, who would have dreamed,
even 25 years ago, that we'd be seeing an excess of "male enhancement"
products either?
 
Here's one that goes 'way back; I used to watch "Who Do You
Trust?" after school when I was a kid. However, it wasn't carried
in Raleigh until about a month before Johnny Carson left the show,
so I remember Woody Woodbury better. Woody, although I think
he's cleaned up his nightclub act somewhat as he's gotten older,
was pretty raunchy by 1962-63 standards, even on television; his
risque stuff went over my head but not my mom's, and she never
did like him. Still, she never kept me from watching him and besides,
"American Bandstand" was on right afterwards.

Someone once said that the difference between Johnny and Woody
was that Johnny could make a risque line sound completely innocent;
Woody could say hello and sound like he was propositioning you.

One thing about Woody that still puzzles me after 50 years: why did
he always wear a fishing getup similar to what McLean Stevenson normally
wore on "M*A*S*H"? "Trust" producer Don Fedderson once told him he
preferred that Woody wear a regular suit and tie; Woody responded that the
getup was part of his nightclub act. Then explain that to the audience, said
Fedderson; most people have never seen your act. Woody never did, and years
later, in one of Richard Lamparski's "Whatever Became Of..." books, he admitted
it was a mistake not to level with his viewers.
 
TexasTom said:
Over the years, I've known a few people whose fundamentalist parents wouldn't allow them to watch "Bewitched" because it was about witchcraft. I guess that was the predecesor to some of the fundamentalist upset over the "Harry Potter" book and movies series a few years back.

I don't recall being prohibited from watching anything myself, although I know my mom (who is from Germany) was less than thrilled with my fondness for "Hogan's Heroes" reruns.

Kids in Birmingham were denied "Bewitched" until 1967, not because of the witchcraft angle, but because WBRC's management thought it might encourage mixed marriages (think whites and blacks).

The lady from Germany is entitled to her opinion on "Hogan's Heroes," of course, since the Germans are made to look like idiots which they certainly were--and are--not. People, though, have a misconception of that show; it takes place in a POW camp, not a concentration camp, and there's a difference. Nobody would have touched the idea of gassing Jews on anything other than a documentary. And there is one show from that era that does portray the Germans as anything but stupid: Robert Goulet's short-lived 1966 spy drama "Blue Light." He plays an OSS agent assigned to get as close to the Nazi high command as possible and learn their plans. To pull it off he masters the German language and ideology, only he does it too well: the Germans soon figure out he's American and want to kill him; the Allies think he's a traitor and want to kill him; and he's lucky the show lasted only a half-season and that somehow he managed not to be killed.

And to the person whose mom didn't want the Joe McCarthy hearings on, my mom wished I'd turn off the Ervin committee hearings on Watergate, simply because she got tired of their being on all day and I couldn't be dragged from the set. I don't recall that she cared one way or another when Nixon resigned although I don't mind saying (she passed away nearly 14 years ago) that she voted Republican only twice: both times for Eisenhower. My grandfather, a lifelong Democrat, gave her you-know-what for crossing party lines.
 
nightfly61 said:
Slightly backwards of our topic, if I was in control of the remote when either parent were in the room I would change the channel if a tampon commercial came on. Sounds outlandish now, but it created an awkward moment. :p

Last night I was sitting there minding my own business when an ad for some ambulance chasing attorneys came on.
They were drumming-up class action business against the makers of some trans-vaginal surgical mesh product.
In the commercial they ran through a long (and very graphic) list of the symptoms of having a defective vaginal
mesh product go bad inside you. I thought "what did I do to deserve this?" Would gladly go back to those 1970's ads
with butterflies and fields of daisies any day!
 
Kids in Birmingham were denied "Bewitched" until 1967, not because of the witchcraft angle, but because WBRC's management thought it might encourage mixed marriages (think whites and blacks).
[/quote]

I'm not from Birmingham and have never been there, but from my understanding, WBRC used to push the slogan "Family First," which in a way kind of explains why they didn't air Bewitched and why they eventually pulled Ellen from their station. But ironically, even with the station's "Family First" reputation, WBRC actually used to air such controversial talk shows as Ricki Lake and Gordon Elliott. Back in the '90s, this advocacy group called Obligation Inc. actually convinced local businesses to pull their commercials from those two shows and several other similar shows on other Birmingham TV stations.
 
Remember, too, that this is the same market where the
current ABC affiliate (ABC33/40) refused to run the episode
of Ellen DeGeneres's sitcom where she came out of the closet.
A local gay group had gathered to watch the show, which was
piped in via WSB Atlanta. However, when the episode was rerun
it was carried in Birmingham.
 
I'm having a hard time with the idea that a mortal/witch marriage has anything to do with
marriages between any mortal humans regardless of other perceived differences.

But then, I've met other examples of determined, obstinate blindness, so I can imagine in 1967, there were a
lot of folks who thought that way.
 
Tom Wells said:
I'm having a hard time with the idea that a mortal/witch marriage has anything to do with
marriages between any mortal humans regardless of other perceived differences.

I absolutely agree. I was only about 12 to 16 years old when the show originally aired, but I was also politically aware (my parents were civil rights advocates, anti-Vietnam War, and generally leftist activists), and this never occurred to me. I don't recall if my parents ever watched Bewitched or not, but I think I would have remembered if they had considered it some kind of metaphor for racially mixed marriages, which they were in favor of. They generally considered sitcoms of this sort to be total junk, though they were big fans of The Dick Van Dyke Show, and the politically aware Norman Lear type comedies that came later All in the Family, etc.
 
Lkeller said:
I couldn't watch westerns, or any of those Warner Bros detective shows (77 Sunset Strip, Hawaiian Eye, Surfside 6).

Being that they were the first Hollywood film studio to enter original television production in 1955 (with "Cheyenne", a western nonetheless)...why would they find the Warner Bros. detective shows "low-brow"?

Now I'm waiting for somebody to say they were forbidden to watch anything from Revue/Universal...not because of the content, but of that scary logo music that gave little kids nightmares for years!!!
 
johnnya2k6 said:
Now I'm waiting for somebody to say they were forbidden to watch anything from Revue/Universal...not because of the content, but of that scary logo music that gave little kids nightmares for years!!!

Including me! Although the "tumbling sticks" Screen Gems logo was a contender.

ixnay
 
I think Warners was the first major studio to enter TV production. Columbia, Republic and Hal Roach were busy with TV shows before Jack Warner decided to set aside his hatred of television.

There was a Yahoo group called the Closing Logo Group that had discussions about scary logos and the music that accompanied them. They also started a website devoted to studio logos.
Screen Gems seemed to be the champ in that department:
The loud "Fanfare of Fear" of the SG logo attached to all the old Three Stooges shorts (blame Jack Shaindlin for the music - it is included in the APM "Cinemusic" package)
The "Dancing Sticks" logo (Music by Frank DeVol)
The "S From Hell" with the creepy electronic fanfare (by Eric Siday)
(The Screen Gems name and logo are now used by Sony's indie film division)

The Revue/Universal fanfare was composed by Juan Esquivel of exotic music fame, co credited to Universal TV music director Stanley Wilson (who discovered John Williams and gave him his first scoring jobs).
 
ixnay said:
johnnya2k6 said:
Now I'm waiting for somebody to say they were forbidden to watch anything from Revue/Universal...not because of the content, but of that scary logo music that gave little kids nightmares for years!!!
Including me! Although the "tumbling sticks" Screen Gems logo was a contender.
I never got why those logos were so scary for some of you. I remember seeing them as a kid myself, and having no reaction at all to them. Was it because they were sometimes louder than the accompanying programming? If so, then commercials should also have been "scary"! :eek:
 
firepoint525 said:
I never got why those logos were so scary for some of you. I remember seeing them as a kid myself, and having no reaction at all to them. Was it because they were sometimes louder than the accompanying programming? If so, then commercials should also have been "scary"! :eek:

Yeah, not scary to me either. Maybe it is because people my age (back then) could tell the difference between "reality" and what was on TV. ;D
 
I like the Revue logo. It's a cool 1950s logo. The "S From Hell" is a little creepy - but it's 1960s nostalgia!

-crainbebo
 
johnnya2k6 said:
Lkeller said:
I couldn't watch westerns, or any of those Warner Bros detective shows (77 Sunset Strip, Hawaiian Eye, Surfside 6).

Being that they were the first Hollywood film studio to enter original television production in 1955 (with "Cheyenne", a western nonetheless)...why would they find the Warner Bros. detective shows "low-brow"?

My parents, though not college educated, were smart and into art and literature...and I'm sure a bit of snobbery entered into the picture. They considered most mainstream TV shows "low brow," and didn't think a stead diet of fictional violence was good for me.

They were in heaven when NET (the PBS predecessor) first became available. They did have their mainstream favorites, though, including Twilight Zone, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, and some of the "better" sitcoms.
 
Over in Britain...I remember reading claims that as kids growing up in the '70s, they were traumatized from the five-note Yorkshire TV fanfare (which was their equivalent to the Revue/Universal jingle).
 
landtuna said:
firepoint525 said:
I never got why those logos were so scary for some of you. I remember seeing them as a kid myself, and having no reaction at all to them. Was it because they were sometimes louder than the accompanying programming? If so, then commercials should also have been "scary"! :eek:

Yeah, not scary to me either. Maybe it is because people my age (back then) could tell the difference between "reality" and what was on TV. ;D

I was 5 years old when I got my first taste of the S From Hell, at the end of The Farmer's Daughter, in 1965. It traumatized me for years.

I also was scared of the Dancing Sticks, the Four Star banner, The WB zooming shield, the BCP crashing cars, the Rankin-Bass rb music....although I wasn't scared of the Viacom V of Doom....go figure...
 
I have heard of - and then later saw on YouTube - a short animated film about the danger of nuclear bombs and their fallout. I read this was first shown on the Ed Sullivan Show about 1953 or so and it scared a number of people not just children. Sounds funny that Sullivan would have aired it with all of the many many live acts he presented, but I'm told he did. Perhaps someone will remember the name of this short film.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom