Re: Victorville, CA Radio Revenue - What is the area worth?
DavidEduardo said:
For whatever the reason, BIA is, today, using all stations home to the metro as its criteria. That's the same as Arbitron uses. We know the FCC will use the Arbitron market definition, but will also look at any signal of a certain intensity as being "in the metro" such as they do for KFI being attributed to San Diego or the Sacramento / San Francisco overlaps CBS confronted when they sold 610 AM in SF, the source of the overlap issues.
Except that the Sacramento issue that forced CBS to sell 610 in SF was a TV issue, not a radio issue. It came about when CBS wanted to buy KOVR(TV) in Stockton, creating a duopoly with its existing KMAX-TV in Sacramento.
As I understand it, the FCC's interpretation of the radio-TV crossownership rules required it to look at two specific custom radio markets - the stations with a certain signal level over the city limits of Sacramento, to determine whether CBS was under the cap for KMAX-TV crossownership with radio, and the stations with a certain signal level over the city limits of Stockton, to make the same determination for KOVR.
Because 610 was strong enough over Sacramento to put CBS over the limit, it ended up getting swapped to Family Stations for 106.9, which doesn't enter into the Sacramento station count.
But that signal-coverage issue only comes into play when TV cross-ownership is involved. Otherwise, as long as the stations being considered for market-cap purposes are in an Arbitron-designated metro, the only issue is the count of stations "home" to the metro, not signal coverage.
In other words, it's my understanding that KFI does
not count against CC's cap in San Diego (or San Bernardino, or anything outside the LA metro) for radio ownership-cap purposes. It would only come into play if CC wanted to buy TV in San Diego.