I wonder if News Corp is getting Dow Jones out of radio so it can create a Fox Business branded radio product?
I wonder if News Corp is getting Dow Jones out of radio so it can create a Fox Business branded radio product?
That makes absolutely no sense, even for Ditto-heads. News Corp owns The Journal. They own Fox. The The Journal is THE leading business publication and DJ is THE leading brand for business news (Bloomberg may get the title someday but not yet). Fox, despite having a business channel, has nowhere near the identity for business news. They'd be better off re-branding FBN as the Dow Jones Network.
Besides, Fox is the tea party network. That's the identity Ailes has established. The Journal (and Barron's) are publications for the corporate elite - the Republican establishment - who have nothing but contempt for the unwashed, blue collar trash of the tea party. They may use them, manipulate them and pander to them but they otherwise can't stand them.
They already offer "Fox News Radio Business Reports" one-minute, fed at :20 and :30on the same satellite channel as the one-minute Fox News Updates.
The Journal (and Barron's) are publications for the corporate elite - the Republican establishment - who have nothing but contempt for the unwashed, blue collar trash of the tea party.
I don't know how it's possible for you to post something that has a little bit of truth in it (Fox Business doesn't have the brand recognition of the WSJ) and still manage to be so crass and ignorant. It really is a sight to see.
The Corporate Elite supports the Democrat Party, and vice-versa. The GOP establishment is the wealthy professionals, small business owners, those with significant but diversified stock portfolios but not control of any single mega-corporation, and the rest of the country club set. If you don't understand how the sides line up regarding political parties, how can anything else you say be taken seriously.
You need to do a little more homework on this. The corporate elite, directly and through PACs or 501C groups, puts far more money into Republican campaigns than Democratic. Yes, they give money to Democrats; they cover their bets. But not nearly as much. Often the money going to candidates of either party doesn't come from the corporation; the elite pressures employees to fork over.
I'm sorry, but there is only one word that completely and accurately summarizes your statement.
Bullshit!
I suppose you repeat a lie often enough people do believe it. Goebbels said it. McCarthy, Nixon and Rush used it. Lie, lie, lie. Deny, deny, deny. If challenged call them biased or communist. The mantra of the right.
You need to do a little more homework on this. The corporate elite, directly and through PACs or 501C groups, puts far more money into Republican campaigns than Democratic. Yes, they give money to Democrats; they cover their bets. But not nearly as much. Often the money going to candidates of either party doesn't come from the corporation; the elite pressures employees to fork over.
Millionaires support Republicans. Billionaires support Democrats.
Millionaires support Republicans. Billionaires support Democrats.