I can see a simple CW 55 branding as well. Could the double nickel logo from the 80's through early 2000's come back?
No. Just the generic CW affiliate logo, similar to what's seen on WUAB and the vast majority of CW stations.I can see a simple CW 55 branding as well. Could the double nickel logo from the 80's through early 2000's come back?
No. Just the generic CW affiliate logo, similar to what's seen on WUAB and the vast majority of CW stations.
WBNX was one of the few CW affiliates to utilize a custom logo upon launch. I don't see that happening under Nexstar's ownership.
Well, they still have to file a notification of consummation right after the transaction takes place. That shouldn't be more than a month from now.That was quick. So I wonder when CW and all the other moves will happen?
September 1, 2025, which is when WUAB's contract runs out. WUAB was bundled in a long-term deal with Nexstar for the CW back in 2023.That was quick. So I wonder when CW and all the other moves will happen?
Doesn't really matter, honestly. If WBNX is used for ATSC 3.0 transmissions (as Cleveland is somehow the largest U.S. market not running that novelty yet) then the 1.0 transmissions of the main channel and subs will be moved to other stations elsewhere in the market.I assume Movies and H&I would go to WOCV. But then Nextstar would need fill the void with some other diginets.
For starters, they better place Rewind TV on WBNX as a result. WJW clearly doesn't want it, despite both being owned by Nexstar.I assume Movies and H&I would go to WOCV. But then Nextstar would need fill the void with some other diginets.
WOIO will also celebrate a 40th on May 19th.It looks like WBNX will have new ownership possibly in time for the station to celebrate 40 years on the air. December 1, 1985 was when 55 first went on the air.
It looks like WBNX will have new ownership possibly in time for the station to celebrate 40 years on the air. December 1, 1985 was when 55 first went on the air.
WOIO will also celebrate a 40th on May 19th.
Preview dropped on the last day of August 1983. I always wondered "What if?" WCLQ wasn't sold to Channel Communications, who seemed to have a knack for making only bad decisions. "What if?" Fox bought them outright as a network affiliate.And I believe WCLQ 61 had dropped Preview around that time period and became a full independent station again, at least for a short period of time.
WCLQ was not able to compete with WUAB and WOIO. Once WBNX arrived, it was pretty much over. At one time, 61 was airing reruns of Dallas, but quickly pulled them as the ratings were not good.Preview dropped on the last day of August 1983. I always wondered "What if?" WCLQ wasn't sold to Channel Communications, who seemed to have a knack for making only bad decisions. "What if?" Fox bought them outright as a network affiliate.
With WOIO and WBNX arriving, the independent market was already being beaten up by cable. No room for a high numbered UHF with a slate of bad programs, so they went the HSN route.
I'm almost glad that WBNX has maintained such an "Independent presence" up to now. But who knows where that will take us when Nexstar takes over. (Please don't let it be fifteen more incarnations of Fox 8 News.)
WBNX was originally intended for airing Ernest Angley's programing. Airing classic re-runs, locally produced programs and other syndicated content was an added bonus. This all improved in the 90's when WBNX acquired the rights to air Fox Kids (rejected by WJW after the FOX/New World merger in 94), and later The WB when it was originally part of a duo affiliation along with UPN on WUAB. There is practically no need for the Grace Cathedral to continue to own and operate a broadcast television station in the streaming age for their religious programming, as managing a streaming service along with an app for that same content is far cheaper and can reach anybody in the world. Nexstar probably made the best offer to buy the station, which they couldn't refuse. (At 22 million dollars).I don't understand the point behind purchasing WBNX. This seems like a case of throwing money down the toilet.
Because anything that's carried outside of the main .1 sub is not considered as must-carry for cable/satellite providers. WJW/Nexstar would have to come to agreements with multiple providers, which may decline carriage. The main .1 sub guarantees that it will be carried by all providers within the market.If Nexstar wanted CW programming under its wing locally, why not just run it on a multicast channel of WJW-TV?
The technology exists for multiple HDTV transmissions to occur using a single RF channel.
Yes, if the timing was different, we've could have seen things turn out differently. WBNX or WOIO could have bought WCLQ instead of starting from scratch. We could have seen Fox 61, CBS 61 or 61 Action NewsPreview dropped on the last day of August 1983. I always wondered "What if?" WCLQ wasn't sold to Channel Communications, who seemed to have a knack for making only bad decisions. "What if?" Fox bought them outright as a network affiliate.
With WOIO and WBNX arriving, the independent market was already being beaten up by cable. No room for a high numbered UHF with a slate of bad programs, so they went the HSN route.
I'm almost glad that WBNX has maintained such an "Independent presence" up to now. But who knows where that will take us when Nexstar takes over. (Please don't let it be fifteen more incarnations of Fox 8 News.)
Hubert Payne was too determined to get WOIO on the air as Channel 19. The sale of WCLQ to Channel Communications was completed a year before WOIO hit the air. WBNX was in another market and I think Ernest Angley was as determined to takeover what another televangelist failed to start.Yes, if the timing was different, we've could have seen things turn out differently. WBNX or WOIO could have bought WCLQ instead of starting from scratch. We could have seen Fox 61, CBS 61 or 61 Action News. Perhaps WBNX 61?
If, say, WOIO ended up on 61, could WBNX opted for 19? WOIO for 55 if it were the other way around? What if, like you said, WCLQ was sold to a completely different broadcaster, and not Channel Communications? What would have ended up on 61 instead of HSN?
Silver King Broadcasting almost converted WQHS into an independent format in the early 2000s, but decided to sell the station (along with others) instead, and almost sold it to ABC/Disney before being outbid by Univision. If Univision wasn't the highest bidder, the ABC affiliation would have surely moved to WQHS, which wouldn't had made WEWS very happy.
Lots of possible outcomes had things turned out differently.
When Angley owned the station, they would blip "hell" and "damn" from any movie and also refused to run any episode of syndicated programming which even remotely discussed sex.WBNX was originally intended for airing Ernest Angley's programing. Airing classic re-runs, locally produced programs and other syndicated content was an added bonus.
Neither were going to happen. Hubert Payne had the backing of Malrite and Metroplex (Wain and Weiss, who later owned WNCX) and they were dead-set on getting the 19 license. The FCC had repeatedly issued permits for channel 19 dating back to 1953, and was at one point desired by WUAB because it was a lower channel number than 43.Yes, if the timing was different, we've could have seen things turn out differently. WBNX or WOIO could have bought WCLQ instead of starting from scratch. We could have seen Fox 61, CBS 61 or 61 Action News. Perhaps WBNX 61?
WQHS would have immediately been sold had Disney bought Silver King. Let alone the sheer expense of building out an ABC O&O from scratch at the upper end of the UHF dial, it would have been very stupid to anger Scripps like that.Silver King Broadcasting almost converted WQHS into an independent format in the early 2000s, but decided to sell the station (along with others) instead, and almost sold it to ABC/Disney before being outbid by Univision. If Univision wasn't the highest bidder, the ABC affiliation would have surely moved to WQHS, which wouldn't had made WEWS very happy.