Somehow The Yankees have been able to fill the Yes Network with all Yankee stuff even in the off season. They've been doing it for many years.
I suggest that anything the Yankees can do, the Cubs can do. What do you think?
BTW Sinclair is now a partner in YES, so I imagine they've already thought of it.
As of now, Marquee has nobody signed up. And time is running short.
Why would Comcast, to whom the Cubs gave the middle finger and still has the other teams under contract, bother with them without some kind of deep discount? They, more than the satellites, are in the drivers seat. From what I've read, Marquee wants $4 per subscriber per month, down from close to $6. The Cubs are counting on their share of that fee to pay players. The Cubs are in deep doodoo if they don't work out something before the first of the year.
Then there's the satellites. If Dish is true to their word, they won't bother with them since they say they're done with RSNs. DirecTV will probably sign them, but would they do so for $4?
This sounds to me like a disaster waiting to happen, and I hope so. This is Tom Ricketts getting greedy in 2019 just like Jerry Reinsdorf and Dollar Bill Wirtz got greedy in 1982 with Sportsvision. The only difference is that it's not possible to bootleg the broadcasts like it was in the '80s.
Also, the Dodgers partnered with the main cable company in LA, and still doesn't cover the entire market. The Cubs are partnering with Sinclair, who has no presence whatsoever in Chicago. Like Spectrum Sports in LA, they may have to make a deal with an OTA broadcaster for a few games just for the exposure. This isn't 2016, and the Cubs are on a downward slope.
I have a feeling that the Cubs, and possibly the other teams as well, will be back on OTA channels within a few years. Chicago isn't LA, which doesn't have a broadcast-sports tradition. If not on WGN-TV, then on one of the other stations.