I'm just saying that to me, you come off as disingenuous when you comment on Alternative as a format or on stations - you downplay the successes the format has while focusing more on the flaws. To me, you come off as expecting the format to fail or even wanting it to. It makes it difficult for me to take anything you say about the format at face value because I expect a heavy amount of bias in your commentary.This is a discussion of Los Angeles radio stations.
As long as the audience is interested in that variety rather than specific groups. Other formats, such as CHR or country, the audience primarily listens for the format. In that way, they're open to new songs or artists that the format presents. In the case of alternative, the audience is primarily interested in its own core groups or artists, and gets their new music from their friends or social media. So each individual listener comes to radio with a different, narrower cultural experience. That makes it hard for a mass medium to reach them.
We're seeing the same thing with rock stations that try to meld two types of rock on one station. In pop music, it works because people are open to the broader range of music. In rock, it doesn't, and those stations are getting very low ratings. There was a time 30 years ago when alternative was a concise format with a clearly defined audience and life group. Not any more. Alternative stations can still get good ratings trying to program to that core group of people, but that's not what Audacy is aiming at right now.
I know I am biased myself, but I try to be upfront about it. I don't get that same impression from you.
I know that KPNT comes up time and time again, but they fuse Alternative and Active together and are doing incredibly well - so much so that a few other Alternatives are starting to adapt the same strategy to varying extents, like WKZQ, KFRR, WBTZ, and KROX. I think that there is a case to be made for bringing some Active Rock back into Alternative right now - not necessarily your Five Finger Death Punch or Dirty Honey-style bands, but more along the lines of Ayron Jones, Spiritbox, The Pretty Reckless, Chevelle, Bring Me The Horizon, Dead Poet Society, etc. Basically dirty rock and alternative metal.
It may not work everywhere, in my opinion the fusion probably would work best in the Midwest and South and not so much the coasts. But Gen Z seems quite interested in heavier bands right now, and perhaps crossing a few of them over might help Alternative keep their footing in the new decade.
Even back in the 1990's, which was when the format was at its most universal, there was a wide variety of music to listen to. Punk/pop-punk, indie rock, grunge, industrial rock, pop crossovers, even Seal scored a surprise Alt hit in 1994 with "Prayer For The Dying". Alternative, in a weird way, has always been a bizarro top 40 with its mix of genres, artists, and sounds. Trying to homogenize Alternative is a fool's errand, I think, because variety has always been a key point of the format. Sometimes we don't like the mix and other times we do, but eventually things will change once again.
Last edited: