• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What happened to Eureka TV News (and ownership)[Was "The Subject Doesn't Matter"

In a recent thread lamenting that the only subject on the board seemed to be KOVR, Stich wrote:

> Well, here's something slightly different...
>
> Anyone know the story behind KVIQ-TV in Eureka? I've noticed
> they've cancelled the rebroadcast of local news from
> KFTY/Santa Rosa, leaving KIEM-TV as the only source of local
> news in the market (minus the KTVU simulcast on KBVU and
> weather updates on KAEF).
>

TedL did some poking around and replied:

A little Googling for "KVIQ, Eureka" turned up a number of links, the most informative being the North Coast Journal, which has been tracking the demise of television news in Eureka for years.

http://www.northcoastjournal.com/052605/cover0526.html

outlines how Chester Smith's Modesto-based Sainte Partners II now controls KVIQ and the Fox station on Ch. 29, along with the WB, UPN and Univision channels that for now, appear only on local cable, according to the Journal.

Sainte was adding over-the-air transmissions of UPN and Univision via low-power televsion facilities it was testing when the above linked article was written in late May, 2005.

The story lists a bunch of related stories at the bottom...(worth reading through) which chronicle the massive changes that have occurred in the 186th ranked Neilsen DMA in the last decade.

The most recent involve bringing in a friendly third-party to hold the license ("own" the station) while Smith's growing company controls the programming and sells the ads.

Journal publisher Judy Hodgson lamented the changes in a column, April 27, this year:
http://www.northcoastjournal.com/040705/pub0407.html

The good, the ugly
by JUDY HODGSON

Last week we learned that the sale of KVIQ Channel 6 won the blessing of the Federal Communications Commission. (The sale itself is not yet complete. See "In the news"http://www.northcoastjournal.com/040705/news0407.html#wrap )

I look forward to the day there is competition in TV news again on the North Coast. After all, we certainly have an abundance of competition these days in the print news business.

It was five years ago that KVIQ and KIEM were all over the county with 15 to 20 staff each in their news departments. KVIQ was producing 22 hours of news shows per week and no story was too small to make it on air.

When the station pulled the plug on local news coverage, instead of "More news, more often" (the title of our cover story, June 29, 2000
http://www.northcoastjournal.com/062900/cover0629.html),

one year later, with one station remaining, it was "less news, sometimes originating from somewhere else."

A search for "KVIQ" within the Journal website turned up a a number of links.

In it's 10/11/2001 edition, the Journal reported:
http://www.northcoastjournal.com/101101/news1011.html#anchor468530

"KVIQ-TV sale announced

The Ackerley Group, a media and entertainment conglomerate that purchased KVIQ-TV Channel 6 in 1999, has itself been sold.

In an agreement announced Monday, Clear Channel Communications Inc. will acquire Ackerley in an all-stock transaction valued at $800 million at the close of business Oct. 5. The figure includes the assumption of approximately $294 million of debt.

What that means for KVIQ's local news department is unclear. In a cover story June 29, 2000 ("More news, more often"), then-General Manager Jeanne Buheit told the Journal that the Ackerley Group had invested more than $1 million in the news department. The number of shows grew from five hours per week to 22, including a live morning show. The news department employed 20 reporters and technicians at the time.

Today, the entire KVIQ staff consists of one on-air reporter, Dave Silverbrand. Weather and other reports are fed to the station from its sister station in Santa Rosa.

Since the Journal report last year, KAEF-TV Channel 7, with north state news coverage originating from Redding, has dropped all reporting from Humboldt County. KIEM-TV in Eureka, the industry leader according to Nielsen Reports, reports that its staffing level is unchanged.

"We have 15 in the news department, same as last year," said Bob Browning, KIEM station manager. "It's our intention to maintain our news coverage at its current level."

Humboldt County is one of the smallest television markets in the United States, ranking 189 out of 210 Nielsen markets nationwide."

A previous Journal story about the then-pending purchase by Ackerly said the station was paying Miller Broadcasting around $5.5 million for the Eureka CBS affiliate.

The demise of the KVIQ news operation was also reported via:

http://www.northcoastjournal.com/011702/news0117.html#anchor433137

"And then there was one

What a difference a year and a half makes.

In the summer of 2000 the North Coast was being served by three television stations, each generating hours of daily news programing. The fierce battle for ratings and ad revenue between KIEM, KVIQ and KAEF was reported in the Journal cover story, "More news, more often," June 29.

At the time KVIQ, No. 2 in the ratings with a staff of 20 gathering and preparing news shows, had increased its programming to 22 hours a week -- up from five. By comparison, the No. 1 rated news team, KIEM, had a staff of 15 and KAEF, three.

As of last week only KIEM remains.

KAEF was the first to drop local newscasts, in February of last year. In May KVIQ owners the Ackerley Group furloughed 12 employees and severely curtailed news coverage. Ackerley, in the process of selling KVIQ to Clear Channel Communications, pulled the plug on its Eureka-based newscast last week.

For the time being KVIQ will retain its Eureka-based sales staff and commercial production crew as well as veteran reporter Dave Silverbrand.

Silverbrand will contribute to the 6 a.m. and 11 p.m. regional newscasts that originate from KTFY. The Santa Rosa station broadcasts 6-9 a.m. daily and has a popular 7 p.m. newscast for its North Coast viewers."

From what Stich posted, that Santa Rosa connection's apparently been severed.

Hope this answers some of your questions, Stich.

In addition to Duluth and Eureka, wonder how many other small television markets have or are going through this kind of change.

What do viewers think?

Ted
 
Very interesting articles. My favorite quote was from June 29, 2000 story:

"If all we did was run network and syndicated programming there would be no point in being a local affiliate. What makes us stand apart is that we are providing local information. That's how local broadcasters will stay in business."

And today? Just look at KVIQ's current weekday schedule:

6am CBS Morning News
7am The Early Show
9am Infomercials
10am The Price is Right
11am The Young and the Restless
Noon Infomercial
12:30 The Bold & the Beautiful
1pm As the World Turns
2pm Guiding Light
3pm Tony Danza
4pm Dr. Phil
5pm Oprah
6pm CBS Evening News
6:30 Frasier
7pm Everybody Loves Raymond
7:30 Everybody Loves Raymond
8pm CBS Primetime
11pm A Current Affair
11:35 David Letterman
12:37 Craig Ferguson
1:37 Infomercial
2:07 CBS News Up To The Minute (until 6am)
 
One of the stories carried a comment (I think it was by the former ND or GM at KVIQ) to the effect that the ad market couldn't support three stations doing news.

(Maybe that should be three stations and a newspaper?)

If I recall correctly, didn't all three stations have news departments in the 70's and 80's? If so, how did they survive back then?

I'm kinda surprised that one of the lagging stations didn't try to work out something with the owners of the Eureka Times-Standard to use their reporters and info in some kind of news sharing arrangement.

A "totally different" approach that might work for small markets is to think small, maybe at a "Neighborhood News" level:

Train and equip local people to shoot with, say small 3-chip Sony DV cameras, a good tripod, wireless mike and the ability to edit on FireWire equipped laptops (I'd recommend Macs and Final Cut Pro.)

Allow them to own the equipment after a certain period of time (so they're more likely to take better care of it.)

Let them come up with the story ideas.

You'd probably get a different look and feel to the news... neighbor talking to neighbor... more in tune, perhaps with what the folks that live in the area are talking about.

Pay them $25-100 a story depending on whether you're after a complete package with on-camera work, or just B-roll and story information.

If you had five to ten people doing this, your up-front equipment investment would be relatively small... $6,000 or so per package.

Find some easy to use way to use high speed data lines or microwave to get the stories back to the studio.

A robotic package of cameras and on-air equipment (Grass Valley's "ParkerVision" product, for example) would let fewer studio staff produce a good-looking on-air product and incorporate the "coverage by neighbors."

To establish yourself as the 24/7 local news source... use Prime Image's box that shortens program length to make room in network and syndie programs for a two-minute news update every hour at the top of the hour... a :90 news segment with all the important world, state and local news of the hour, plus sports and weather wrapped around a :30 spot.

At $50 a spot (a conservative figure for Eureka, perhaps) that's $600 a day or $237,250 a year. Maybe that's enough to make a difference in whether a station can afford to do news.

My $.47.

Ted.


> Very interesting articles. My favorite quote was from June
> 29, 2000 story:
>
> "If all we did was run network and syndicated programming
> there would be no point in being a local affiliate. What
> makes us stand apart is that we are providing local
> information. That's how local broadcasters will stay in
> business."
>
> And today? Just look at KVIQ's current weekday schedule:
>
> 6am CBS Morning News
> 7am The Early Show
> 9am Infomercials
> 10am The Price is Right
> 11am The Young and the Restless
> Noon Infomercial
> 12:30 The Bold & the Beautiful
> 1pm As the World Turns
> 2pm Guiding Light
> 3pm Tony Danza
> 4pm Dr. Phil
> 5pm Oprah
> 6pm CBS Evening News
> 6:30 Frasier
> 7pm Everybody Loves Raymond
> 7:30 Everybody Loves Raymond
> 8pm CBS Primetime
> 11pm A Current Affair
> 11:35 David Letterman
> 12:37 Craig Ferguson
> 1:37 Infomercial
> 2:07 CBS News Up To The Minute (until 6am)
>
 
> If I recall correctly, didn't all three stations have news
> departments in the 70's and 80's? If so, how did they
> survive back then?

Eureka only had two commercial stations in the seventies and much of the eighties -- looking at FCC records, it appears that KAEF didn't come on the air until 1987. So, historically, the area had two local stations running newscasts.

It does seem that Eureka is rather small to support three competitive news operations, but it certainly seems like it should be able to support more than one.
 
> One of the stories carried a comment (I think it was by the
> former ND or GM at KVIQ) to the effect that the ad market
> couldn't support three stations doing news.
>
> (Maybe that should be three stations and a newspaper?)
>
> If I recall correctly, didn't all three stations have news
> departments in the 70's and 80's? If so, how did they
> survive back then?
>
> I'm kinda surprised that one of the lagging stations didn't
> try to work out something with the owners of the Eureka
> Times-Standard to use their reporters and info in some kind
> of news sharing arrangement.
>
> A "totally different" approach that might work for small
> markets is to think small, maybe at a "Neighborhood News"
> level:
>
> Train and equip local people to shoot with, say small 3-chip
> Sony DV cameras, a good tripod, wireless mike and the
> ability to edit on FireWire equipped laptops (I'd recommend
> Macs and Final Cut Pro.)
>
> Allow them to own the equipment after a certain period of
> time (so they're more likely to take better care of it.)
>
> Let them come up with the story ideas.
>
> You'd probably get a different look and feel to the news...
> neighbor talking to neighbor... more in tune, perhaps with
> what the folks that live in the area are talking about.
>
> Pay them $25-100 a story depending on whether you're after a
> complete package with on-camera work, or just B-roll and
> story information.
>
> If you had five to ten people doing this, your up-front
> equipment investment would be relatively small... $6,000 or
> so per package.
>
> Find some easy to use way to use high speed data lines or
> microwave to get the stories back to the studio.
>
> A robotic package of cameras and on-air equipment (Grass
> Valley's "ParkerVision" product, for example) would let
> fewer studio staff produce a good-looking on-air product and
> incorporate the "coverage by neighbors."
>
> To establish yourself as the 24/7 local news source... use
> Prime Image's box that shortens program length to make room
> in network and syndie programs for a two-minute news update
> every hour at the top of the hour... a :90 news segment with
> all the important world, state and local news of the hour,
> plus sports and weather wrapped around a :30 spot.
>
> At $50 a spot (a conservative figure for Eureka, perhaps)
> that's $600 a day or $237,250 a year. Maybe that's enough
> to make a difference in whether a station can afford to do
> news.
>
> My $.47.
>
> Ted.
Another option would be to partner with a local college (or possibly even high schools to get things started). Use the same model - local reporters in different neighborhoods - plus you could attract a younger demographic. With local reporters, you could also emphasize local sports - down through high school (which I think is big in any market).

Just my $.48 (adjusted for inflation since the original message was posted).

Jim
 
> > If I recall correctly, didn't all three stations have news
>
> > departments in the 70's and 80's? If so, how did they
> > survive back then?
>
> Eureka only had two commercial stations in the seventies and
> much of the eighties -- looking at FCC records, it appears
> that KAEF didn't come on the air until 1987. So,
> historically, the area had two local stations running
> newscasts.
>
> It does seem that Eureka is rather small to support three
> competitive news operations, but it certainly seems like it
> should be able to support more than one.
>
There was a time in the 90's when KAEF, KVIQ, and KIEM had news broadcasts. At it's peak KVIQ had LOCAL news for an hour in the morning at 6, half hour at noon, live at five (half hour), six (hour), and 11 (half hour). Then the six o'clock hour in the morning fades away, and then slowly all the news fades away except for the hour in the morning at six and eleven in the evening (those were broadcasts from KFTY in Santa Rosa). KAEF had news at 5:30 and 6:30 (IIRC), and KIEM had news at 5, 6, and 11 (which they still do).<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by TheUltimateGift on 12/10/05 11:56 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom