DavidEduardo said:Wthom100 said:Thought I would ask - what is the common defintion of a "Heritage" radio station? And what stations today can truely be called "Heritage" stations?
To me, a heritage station is one that has done whatever it is it does well for many years and is still successful at it.
The moment a station is no longer successful, any heritage it had is lost.
WLNG in Sag Harbor is a heritage station... just as relevant to the community now as ever.
KHJ in LA is not a heritage station... the call letters mean nothing if nearly nobody is listening and there is no tradition behind the programming. KHJ is just old, but has no heritage today, as it passes nothing on to tomorrow's listener.
BRNout said:Well, WIND has gone the route of a lot of former AM Top 40 stations in the form of news/talk. I don't know that it's any less recognizable that WABC or WLS when you put it that way. But, to their credit, at least the guys at WIND still play one of their old jingles once in a while as a bumper going back in to their local morning show. And, they have local personalities and a local news staff (or guy, at least). All in all, not that bad.
It's not nearly as bad as what happened to KAAY, which is truly a wasted (and neglected) 50 kw station that no one listens to and which does absolutely nothing to serve it's community. It, along with WPTR 1540, are the two former AM greats that have undoubtedly fallen the farthest. Both are wastes of electricity and do nothing to serve their respective markets.
And, no, I am not some intolerant, anti-religious nut. Far from it. But this sort of station only serves to take money from society's most vulnerable in the name of God - and they greedily spend it on their own little ego trips. A tornado could be wiping out downtown Little Rock and 50 kw KAAY would still be playing a 5 month old tape of some nutjob handling snakes and thumping Bibles. And, I consider that to be beyond a waste.
cyberdad said:In no way am I commenting on WIND's programming or the sincere effort they're making to add a measure of local content. My reference has to do with two considerations. Primarily, the disconnect between what the station is now and what it was during its glory days. First as a top-40, adult contemporary (by 50s-60s standards) hybrid, then oldies, then with somewhat less success as a talker. Then along came new ownership and the days as the Spanish language "La Tremenda".
In other words no tradition at WIND of basically doing one thing (or variations of one thing) successfully using the same call letters for....lets say....25 years or more. And no real connection between the station and its audience of today and "back in the day". (Have to admit the occasional vintage jingle is a nice touch....I'll personally always have a soft spot for WIND).
My personal secondary consideration of a "non-heritage" station is where you have a brand that was once among the leaders in ratings that's now firmly mired in the second tier. This is the case with 'IND.
cyberdad said:In no way am I commenting on WIND's programming or the sincere effort they're making to add a measure of local content. My reference has to do with two considerations. Primarily, the disconnect between what the station is now and what it was during its glory days. First as a top-40, adult contemporary (by 50s-60s standards) hybrid, then oldies, then with somewhat less success as a talker. Then along came new ownership and the days as the Spanish language "La Tremenda".
In other words no tradition at WIND of basically doing one thing (or variations of one thing) successfully using the same call letters for....lets say....25 years or more. And no real connection between the station and its audience of today and "back in the day". (Have to admit the occasional vintage jingle is a nice touch....I'll personally always have a soft spot for WIND).
My personal secondary consideration of a "non-heritage" station is where you have a brand that was once among the leaders in ratings that's now firmly mired in the second tier. This is the case with 'IND.
cyberdad said:If you look at the Chicago radio dial....by my (strictly one dude's opinion) yardstick. WGN, WBBM, and WMBI would be the heritage stations on the am band. I personally probably wouldn't include it, but a legitimate argument could also be made for WVON.
radioman148 said:cyberdad said:If you look at the Chicago radio dial....by my (strictly one dude's opinion) yardstick. WGN, WBBM, and WMBI would be the heritage stations on the am band. I personally probably wouldn't include it, but a legitimate argument could also be made for WVON.
Why wouldn't you include WLS?
cyberdad said:radioman148 said:cyberdad said:If you look at the Chicago radio dial....by my (strictly one dude's opinion) yardstick. WGN, WBBM, and WMBI would be the heritage stations on the am band. I personally probably wouldn't include it, but a legitimate argument could also be made for WVON.
Why wouldn't you include WLS?
Because my personal definition/opinion includes having the same basic format for 25 or more years. As a talker, WLS would be getting close, but I believe they were still "musicradio" 25 years ago in 1984.
BRNout said:Well, WIND has gone the route of a lot of former AM Top 40 stations in the form of news/talk. I don't know that it's any less recognizable that WABC or WLS when you put it that way. But, to their credit, at least the guys at WIND still play one of their old jingles once in a while as a bumper going back in to their local morning show. And, they have local personalities and a local news staff (or guy, at least). All in all, not that bad.
It's not nearly as bad as what happened to KAAY, which is truly a wasted (and neglected) 50 kw station that no one listens to and which does absolutely nothing to serve it's community. It, along with WPTR 1540, are the two former AM greats that have undoubtedly fallen the farthest. Both are wastes of electricity and do nothing to serve their respective markets.
And, no, I am not some intolerant, anti-religious nut. Far from it. But this sort of station only serves to take money from society's most vulnerable in the name of God - and they greedily spend it on their own little ego trips. A tornado could be wiping out downtown Little Rock and 50 kw KAAY would still be playing a 5 month old tape of some nutjob handling snakes and thumping Bibles. And, I consider that to be beyond a waste.
cyberdad said:Don't know about WPTR, but my guess is that KAAY is a pure cash cow with little or no investment on the part of Citadel in either the on-air product or the physical plant. From that standpoint, I wouldn't call it a waste of electricity. Although philosophically, its sad to see once-mighty powerhouses be reduced to this sort of operation.
BRNout said:You mean people actually listen to that? I've never actually met anyone who did - and the ratings are never significant for such stuff. Not to mention that Little Rock is a market that's chock full of various types of religious formats (on AM and FM), many of which actually do have a decent audience.
Just because LIN ran it that way doesn't mean that Citadel had to stay the course. And, presented properly, KAAY need not be a second-rate talker. For one thing, you can have the 50 kw AM simulcast their talk FM (as KARN does now) - increasing the daytime range significantly. And, you gain a lot more listeners at night than you'd lose. Stick something else on the present 5 kw KARN AM signal. You can either run other talkers - or something different entirely.
Basically anything other than simulcasting WWV will outdraw the flaming crap that is coming out of KAAY now. And even that is debatable. Besides, why would Citadel want to own a 50 kw station that is in the same league as the snake-handlers? This isn't really what they do.
gr8oldies said:I hear you, but its reeliable money, month after month, year after year that no one has to beat the bushes for. Religious broadcasters will buy that huge signal and pay top dollar for it. They don't get into a lot of the outright extremist stuff that WNQM and WWCR in Nashville (Brother Stair is probaly the wackiest). Yes, people do listen to these preachers. KAAY could get better ratings, but why walk away from that revenue which wouldn't be that easy to replace.