You seem to have missed the extensive discussions about how the major advertisers aren't interested in reaching people over 55 by radio, despite the fact that they have "more disposable income" because it takes more money to reach them than can be made on the sale. It is not the radio stations nor the ad agencies, pulling the purse strings. It costs less to reach a young person than an older one. That's only three lines, David and Michael. How did I do?
Nailed it, Semoochie. Except that, yeah, it's the agencies making that determination.
Radio stations would love it if every listener were valued equally by the agencies. It just isn't that way.
Really never was. Apart from the chase for teen and young adult dollars in the 60s and 70s, it's always been an 18-49 or 25-54 world. Anyone operating outside that, older or younger, had to find a sufficient number of non-traditional advertisers who believed there was an upside to advertising.
Bongwater, almost nobody is aiming for kids. Even CHR is an 18-34 format.
And while you're right than money is tighter for many young people today than it was for many of us, when it comes to young adults with jobs, spouses and kids (average age of first childbirth in this country is 27), they're forced to spend whatever they have just to live (house, furniture, car, clothing, food, toys).
Those are the people who face daily choices about how and where to spend their money...an ideal ad target.
Those of us thinking about buying what might be our last Hotpoint or Honda are a harder, more expensive reach and sell.
And in 1963, it was the same way. We think of traditional MOR giants like WNEW, KMPC and KSFO as old people's stations, but they were aiming 18-49, with jocks in their 20s and 30s. Not much around then for someone pushing or past 60, either.
Last edited: