Considering IMO it looks like the "SD feed" of HD cable channels these days seem to me to look like a severely downcompressed, cropped signal--while those channels still in SD only are still actually shown in full screen, at least on my Comcast lineup--what is the point as we start 2023 of cable systems still bothering to carry both HD and SD feeds of cable channels?
Comcast is still doing this and does not appear to have any plans to wind down SD even on "legacy" (i.e., 2-99) cable channels--the complete opposite of their push to encrypt everything including local channels, drop analog, and go all-digital over a decade ago.
Although the HD feeds take up more bandwidth than their SD counterparts, why can't Comcast and others set a date to convert all their systems to a primarily "all-HD" lineup (with maybe either legacy 2-99, Limited Basic lifeline lineup, plus the channels that aren't still offered in HD--but still are in widescreen--being the only exceptions, if any).
Comcast is still doing this and does not appear to have any plans to wind down SD even on "legacy" (i.e., 2-99) cable channels--the complete opposite of their push to encrypt everything including local channels, drop analog, and go all-digital over a decade ago.
Although the HD feeds take up more bandwidth than their SD counterparts, why can't Comcast and others set a date to convert all their systems to a primarily "all-HD" lineup (with maybe either legacy 2-99, Limited Basic lifeline lineup, plus the channels that aren't still offered in HD--but still are in widescreen--being the only exceptions, if any).