Who's Mark Ramsey - Well, the 2006 NAB Convention Sure is Listening !

[analogAMforever]

"Radio’s Future: What Is and What’s Next"

http://www.nabradioshow.com/attendees/SessionDetail.asp?id=1204732

"Based on the broadest and most representative proprietary national study of U.S. consumers ever conducted for radio, Mercury Radio Research and hear2.0 principals Mark Ramsey and Harve Alan present what’s really going on in the audience – and how it will affect your station now and in the years to come."

Sure wish I could attend ! IBOCRocks and David - so much for trying to discredit Mark Ramsey ! Too bad iBiquity won't be there - maybe they are too afraid, or too embarassed, to get a hard wakup call !

 

[tankedsecondchance]

mark and a couple of others work very hard at keeping em all honest............

thanks mark.........to bad he cant force em, to put the radio back into my radio....

 

[I.B. Iquity]

"Sure wish I could attend ! IBOCRocks and David - so much for trying to discredit Mark Ramsey ! Too bad iBiquity won't be there - maybe they are too afraid, or too embarassed, to get a hard wakup call !"

Yea too bad. the opening act will be Tammy Faye Baker and Jimmy Swaggart. All praising Mark Ramsey, our leader into tomorrows secular world.

 

[PLL]

"Yea too bad. the opening act will be Tammy Faye Baker and Jimmy Swaggart. All praising Mark Ramsey, our leader into tomorrows secular world."

Yea, I guess you are right - we really can't take the NAB Convention very seriously, considering HD Radio is such a joke.

 

[I.B. Iquity]

"Yea, I guess you are right - we really can't take the NAB Convention very seriously, considering HD Radio is such a joke. "

Only to the uninformed. May I suggest you go elsewhere for your news and information. You won't be missed.

 

[PLL]

"Only to the uninformed. May I suggest you go elsewhere for your news and information. You won't be missed."

Yea, I wouldn't be missed, because I speak the truth about IBOC and you have no counter-arguments that hold any substance, just like IBOCRocks. BTW, that was a pretty poor comeback !

IBOCRocks, I just noticed you logged on, your must have been eagerly waiting by your computer and got beeped by reply mail !

 

[IBOCRocks]

"Only to the uninformed. May I suggest you go elsewhere for your news and information. You won't be missed."

Yea, I wouldn't be missed, because I speak the truth about IBOC and you have no counter-arguments that hold any substance, just like IBOCRocks. BTW, that was a pretty poor comeback !

IBOCRocks, I just noticed you logged on, your must have been eagerly waiting by yoiur computer and got beeped by reply mail !

You don't know what truth is. You've been caught telling so many lies here that anything you say is suspect!

 

[PLL]

Why don't you try, posting some counter-argument of substance.

 

[IBOCRocks]

Why don't you try, posting some counter-argument of substance.

Because I have nothing to prove, other than to continue to out you for the habitual liar that you are.

 

[I.B. Iquity]

And the owner of multiple screen names. This jackass tries to fool people into believing his is the opinion of more than one or two losers, when in fact he is all alone. How sad.

 

[IBOCRocks]

And the owner of multiple screen names. This jackass tries to fool people into believing his is the opinion of more than one or two losers, when in fact he is all alone. How sad.

Do me a favor, I.B...

Management has removed his post about leaving me alone due to "being afraid of me". I'm trying to pull it out of my internet cache. Let me know if you find it in yours. I believe his next post will be to deny he ever said that...



(If you don't have it, that's fine...I'm sure most people saw it anyway)

 

[IBOCRocks]

And the owner of multiple screen names. This jackass tries to fool people into believing his is the opinion of more than one or two losers, when in fact he is all alone. How sad.

I also noticed that he's posting under "PLL" today. I wonder if analogAMforever was banned?

 

[I.B. Iquity]

Gee I missed all the phun. I questioned whether I should use the kind of language I did and having thought about it, I realized its hard to argue with accuracy.

 

[IBOCRocks]

Gee I missed all the phun. I questioned whether I should use the kind of language I did and having thought about it, I realized its hard to argue with accuracy.

HA! Good point!

;D

 

[I.B. Iquity]

Gee, it's nice to read some laughter in this otherwise bitter place. I will ask tomorrow what WCBS AM did to improve their audio. It really sounds like FM now. I ws stunned to say the least. I'm hearing about a new proccesor that allows the audio to be tweaked. If so the difference is very audible. Where WCBS AM used to be the worst sounding IBOC station it is now far and away the best.

 

[PLL]

IBOCRocks: "Because I have nothing to prove, other than to continue to out you for the habitual liar that you are."

You have plenty to prove, because every indication is that IBOC is a flawed and fraudulent technology. Sad point is, that you have no counter-arguments of any substance.

 

[IBOCRocks]

IBOCRocks: "Because I have nothing to prove, other than to continue to out you for the habitual liar that you are."

You have plenty to prove, because every indication is that IBOC is a flawed and fraudulent technology. Sad point is, that you have no counter-arguments of any substance.

It's pretty much a waste of time to counter obvious lies. Plus, you're not bringing up anything you haven't beaten to death here already.

 

[I.B. Iquity]

Calm down and take your pills. Who do you think you are, the inverntor of the Cam D system?

"CAM-D
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Compatible Amplitude Modulation - Digital or CAM-D is a proposed hybrid digital radio format for AM broadcasting, put forth by respected broadcast engineer Leonard Kahn.

While little is known about it, it is an in-band on-channel technology that uses the sidebands of any AM radio station. Analog information is still used up to a bandpass of about 7.5kHz, with standard amplitude modulation. The missing treble information that AM normally lacks is then transmitted digitally beyond this. Audio mixing in the receiver then blends them back together.

Unlike other IBOC technologies like Digital Radio Mondiale and iBiquity's HD Radio, Kahn's apparently does not provide a direct path to all-digital transmissions, nor any multichannel capability. The advantage however is that it takes up far less of the sidebands, thereby causing far less interference to adjacent channels, hence the "Compatible" in the name. That problem has plagued HD Radio on AM, along with the fact that it (like CAM-D) is proprietary. HD Radio also requires expensive new transmitters, while CAM-D does not."

So I wonder with all the blending what Cam-D sounds like in the middle of a thunder storm. What this tells me is that Cam-D is not entirely digital. This is a great article. It's from the everyone's a cheat and thief but me. Always question the self acclaimed nobleman.

 

[PLL]

The best answer is just to leave the broadcast bands all analog - IBOC is not gaining us anything and no one is complaining about analog AM/FM, and that is why there is total apathy towards IBOC. IBOC will fail, there is VERY little interest in IBOC and the whole BIG HD Radio rollout has been a complete joke.

 

[IBOCRocks]

The best answer is just to leave the broadcast bands all analog - IBOC is not gaining us anything and no one is complaining about analog AM/FM, and that is why there is total apathy towards IBOC. IBOC will fail, there is VERY little interest in IBOC and the whole BIG HD Radio rollout has been a complete joke.

Yep, you're so sure it will be a big failure that you're here practically begging people to stay away from HD Radio. Apparently, you're afraid that people will like it.

If you weren't, you'd let people decide for themselves. It's obvious by your frequent name changes, though, that you think we're all too stupid to figure you out.

Seeing how the tone of your posts have changed over the past few months, you've finally realized that you aren't mentally superior, and now you're just here to try and confuse people by posting under multiple names, contradicting yourself, and unsuccessfully trying to use "mind games" (ooooh...another meltdown! I'm afraid of him! etc...). Simply put, if you can't "own" the board, you'll just mess it up for everyone else.

It's pretty pathetic, really. You should have quit when you were ahead...instead your obsession with having to have the last word on something got the best of you.

As for me living here? You've been kicked off TWICE! You need this board so much that you'll use fraudulent means to come back!