• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WQLN (Erie Pa) PBS and Rogers decision to remove it from London ON cable

Is anyone here following Rogers Cable decision to replace PBS station WQLN in the London cable-tv market with WTVS (Detroit PBS) ???

Quite a lot of speculation on the future of WQLN because they get a lot of donations from London ($150 - $200k / year) and seem to gear some of their programming for London viewers.
 
Yes. I have been following this with some interest. According to Scott Fybush and Northeast Radio Watch, the station is seriously considering the possibility of a merger with another public broadcaster, or an outright sale of both the TV and FM stations. If neither happens, it's a safe bet QLN will go dark. According to the article quoted in NERW.

This is sad. I like WQLN. Of course, being in upstate NY, I don't get their TV station, but I do listen to the FM via webcast. It is one of the better small market public radio stations around. Yes, they offer much of the basic NPR fare. But they produce a lot of their own music and speciality shows, many of which I think are hosted by volunteers from the community. IMHO, other public radio stations could take a few pointers from WQLN's model, instead of simply just plugging into the NPR/PRI feeds all day and night, with little local content.

I'm afraid Rogers will not care if WQLN goes dark. This is a mega media outfit we're talking about here. One PBS station is just like all the others, and Detroit stations seem to be the "tried and true" choices for Canadian cable systems. Let's hope I'm wrong.

Here's a topic for discussion. If WQLN merges or sells out to another public broadcaster, which one would be interested? WPSU? WQED? One of the Buffalo or Cleveland stations? I wonder.
 
To update this...Rogers will keep WQLN now, after the station arranged for a fiber feed.

From the London Free Press:

http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2009/07/31/10322201-sun.html

London's long-time PBS affiliate is staying on local airwaves.

Rogers Cable has reversed a plan to remove WQLN from its London-area offerings after the Erie, Pa., station pledged to spend about $50,000 to make its spotty broadcasts more reliable.

WPBS/Watertown NY was in the same boat, and they rely on their Canadian audience (Ottawa area) even more than WQLN relies on London. They'll stay as well.

http://watertowndailytimes.com/article/20090731/NEWS03/307319981

But WPBS - since there's no suitable cable across the St. Lawrence Seaway - will have to fiber the signal to Buffalo NY, then back up to Rogers.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom