> yeah I noticed that too! looks great. if only the station
> sounded better...i mean seriously, if i listen to the
> station for at least a couple hours, I know i will hear the
> same song at least once or twice. Z102 does a pretty good
> job butchering some great music because they can't go an
> hour or two without playin the same dang song over and over
> again. That goes for 104.9 too. I just hope Hot 97.3
> doesn't take the same direction. Although I have never
> worked for radio or never have had any experience, I am a
> regular listener and I know that people don't like to hear
> the same songs over and over again.
>
> (sorry for rambling but now back on the topic)...99.5 The
> Bear finally re-did their website as well. I thought it
> would never happen. It looks great too.
>
> Hot 97.3 has a myspace...does that count as a website?
>
>
http://www.myspace.com/Hot973
Yes, I'd say that counts!
And since myspace is owned by Fox's parent co, they can tie it in with Fox34 or MyTVnetwork if they ever get that here.
I agree with you about Z102, but unfortunately, that's more a reflection of the format right now. In Lubbock, we now have 4 stations that are of the Top40 Genre (which is a good thing, in my view).
I can't speak specifically about Z102. What I can say is, if a radio station decides that all it needs to do every year is change voice-over talents, update the playlist a bit and change the voice tracks a little to sound like new, that's not going to do it. Certain stations need to radically change their package, their formatic and their sound. And, in some rare cases, a name change is in order. Of course, if your radio station is doing fine as it is with sales (gee, I wonder who I could be talking about?), why fix what isn't broken? There are some cases where ratings do not matter. I think this is such a case.
imho.
>