• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

YOU BETTER WATCH OUT, YOU BETTER NOT CRY, YOU BETTER NOT POUT...

F

fred flintstone

Guest
I'm telling you why: PPM is coming to town.
Some gotta win; some gotta lose.

RadioDailyNews.com
Arbitron reports that it has begun installing its Portable People Meter system among Philadelphia-area consumers for the all-electronic radio ratings service, which is scheduled to replace the current paper and pencil diary method that the company has employed to collect radio audience estimates in Philadelphia since the late 1960s

People lie on diaries.
People try to make a good impression on whoever reads their diary.
People try to "help" a station.
People write what they would have listened to if only....
People fill out diaries at the end of the week and put down what they think maybe they remember they listened to.
People exaggerate how long they listen.

Diary panels are filled with consistent errors and have always been unreliable. Some stations have had their numbers puffed; others have been under-reported.
When the PPM numbers come out next winter, who rises? Who falls?

My guess: KYW falls with a big crash. Cume probably holds but tune-ins and TSLs drop.
Ironically, stations people leave on and don't pay attention to may get a boost.
 
fred flintstone said:
Ironically, stations people leave on and don't pay attention to may get a boost.
You mean like Sunny 104.5? Oh wait. Well B101 will probably get a boost, but I also think 610, 950, and 1210 could get a boost by the not really paying attention factor. Alot of people put on 610, and onl;y pay attention when sometyhing interesting is being talked about. A big loser might be either wired (if still around) or Q102. I see alot of merging with diary noting (meaning, someone who goes back and forth between the 2 stations, only marking down the one station for the entire time.)
 
I think Q 102 is gonna be the one thats staying it's a more mainstream CHR sounding station. Wired, is trying to go after Q but they shouldn't they should go after 98.9 or 100.3 The Beat, some station like that. Q 102 should lean less rhythmic and add a little bit more pop & rock to their playlist like Z100 in New York and they will be fine.
 
fred flintstone said:
People lie on diaries.
People try to make a good impression on whoever reads their diary.
People try to "help" a station.
People write what they would have listened to if only....
People fill out diaries at the end of the week and put down what they think maybe they remember they listened to.
People exaggerate how long they listen.

Diary panels are filled with consistent errors and have always been unreliable. Some stations have had their numbers puffed; others have been under-reported.
When the PPM numbers come out next winter, who rises? Who falls?

My guess: KYW falls with a big crash. Cume probably holds but tune-ins and TSLs drop.
Ironically, stations people leave on and don't pay attention to may get a boost.

LOL Fred ;D YOU better watch out because David Edward Gleason is probably lurking like a vulture ready to rebut your statement!!
 
Apparently he was on this board during the night and posted to another thread.
He knows programming and the business side of radio but he doesn't know research methodology.
Few people working in radio do, which is why the radio business has bad audience research and - as a result - is out of touch with the listener base and makes so many bad decisions.
But as long as his friend "KMRichards" doesn't have the ability here to delete posts or ban those who disagree with him (or threaten to do so), I am happy to discuss these issues with him.
 
He knows programming and the business side of radio but he doesn't know research methodology.

--->>>> Call Arbitron, ask for Dr. Ed Cohen and ask if I know research methodology. Please!!!

--->>>> Among my jobs is running the research division of a company with 70 stations that is up 28% in ratings in the last year. Obviously, I know nothing about research.


Few people working in radio do, which is why the radio business has bad audience research and - as a result - is out of touch with the listener base and makes so many bad decisions.

---->>>> Most radio companies buy research from specialized companies, that really are good at research, like Critical Mass, BA, Coleman, etc. And the research companies guide the user through the interpretation.

But as long as his friend "KMRichards" doesn't have the ability here to delete posts or ban those who disagree with him (or threaten to do so), I am happy to discuss these issues with him.

---- >>>>There are no issiues. You post inaccurate stuff.
 
People lie on diaries.

---- >>>>> No they do not They may be imprecise, but nothing else.

People try to make a good impression on whoever reads their diary.

--->>>> Seen no evidence of this, and I have reviewed hundreds of thousands of diaries since 1970.

People try to "help" a station.

--->>>> I see minimal anecdotal evidence of helping a favorite statin, and not enough to change the resultss.

People write what they would have listened to if only....
People fill out diaries at the end of the week and put down what they think maybe they remember they listened to.

--->>>> Arbitron calls 4 times, and people, at worst, fill out the whole weekend at one time. Weekdays are filled each evening, usually.

People exaggerate how long they listen.

---->>>> No, they do not. PPM and diary show near identical use of radio. Use of stations changes.

Diary panels are filled with consistent errors and have always been unreliable. Some stations have had their numbers puffed; others have been under-reported.
When the PPM numbers come out next winter, who rises? Who falls?

---- PPM was used for 2 years in test in Philly. It hardly changed share at all.

My guess: KYW falls with a big crash. Cume probably holds but tune-ins and TSLs drop.
Ironically, stations people leave on and don't pay attention to may get a boost.

KYW gains huge, huge amounts cume, and goes up a few ticks in share and AQH the PPM vs. diary. It picks up lots of P4 and below cume, and enough quarter hours to slightly increase it. In general, the pPM shows that the diary works very accurately.
 
One fun anecdote:

While in college (20+ years ago), a local DJ came to speak at the college. She told a story of when she was the 7-midnight jock on the local AM Top-40 station. Her girlfriend's mother got an Arbitron diary. The girlfriend's mother only listened to the religious station in the market. However, she knew her daughter's friend was the evening DJ on the Top-40 station. So the mother truthfully filled out when she listened to the religious station during the day ... and put down that she listened to the Top-40 station every night from 7 to midnight.

The DJ predicted Arbitron probably threw out the diary ... meaning that the religious station also didn't get its credit.

I've never been a fan of Arbitron's diary methodology. Any radio executive who is opposing the people meters is just afraid of what the electronic survey will really show ... probably less listening. Electronic just has to be better than recall once per day in a written diary.
 
radiophiler said:
One fun anecdote:

While in college (20+ years ago), a local DJ came to speak at the college. She told a story of when she was the 7-midnight jock on the local AM Top-40 station. Her girlfriend's mother got an Arbitron diary. The girlfriend's mother only listened to the religious station in the market. However, she knew her daughter's friend was the evening DJ on the Top-40 station. So the mother truthfully filled out when she listened to the religious station during the day ... and put down that she listened to the Top-40 station every night from 7 to midnight.

The DJ predicted Arbitron probably threw out the diary ... meaning that the religious station also didn't get its credit.

I've never been a fan of Arbitron's diary methodology. Any radio executive who is opposing the people meters is just afraid of what the electronic survey will really show ... probably less listening. Electronic just has to be better than recall once per day in a written diary.

Actuallly, listening increases. remeber, we had 2 years of PPM in Philly and are in the second year of Houston, with the 14th month just released and weeklies available now for the first time. I have been following the PPM releases since Philly, and also Houston and the listening levels are up a tiny bit. What changes is there are more stations per listener per week (it is a panel, with 24 months the max tenure) so every day can be perfectly balanced. It is so fast, that I just got the second week of august for Houston today....
 
SuperRadioFan said:
Man, David, when the hell do you sleep?? Oh yeh you told me you can get by 3 hours or so :D

It´s not sleep, it is time zones. Been in three of them today.
 
DENIAL: A RIVER IN EGYPT

DavidEduardo said:
---- >>>>There are no issiues. You post inaccurate stuff.

You can say that all you want, it does not make it true.
You don't know reseach.
And companies which do "broadcast research" do incompetent or schlock work, which does not stand up to methological scrutiny.

Of course, as broadcast consultant with an undisguised online identity, I suppose you can't afford to tell the truth about radio research, or to stray from the industry line and what your clients want to hear - a problem radio consultants and radio "researchers," in general, face.

Somebody better get radio managers to face reality before it's too late. Listeners are leaving. Advertisers are leaving. Nobody is satisfied with radio. And so-called consultants keep tacking the money and enabling denial.
 
Re: DENIAL: A RIVER IN EGYPT

---- >>>>There are no issiues. You post inaccurate stuff.

You can say that all you want, it does not make it true.

---->>>> I have specifically shown how your claims are not in agreement with facts.

---->>>> For example, you said earlier in this threead that KYW would take a bath in the PPM, while the fact is we already had 2 years of PPM in Philadelphia, and KYW was up dramatically in cume, and slightly in share. I am guessing you did not even know that two years of PPM from Philly and 14 months form Houston have been released to selected users... and everything you say is totally wrong. Your comments on the diary methodology earlier are similarly flawed... and do not match reality in any way.

You don't know reseach.

---->>>> And you know this how? I asked you to call Dr. Ed Cohen at Arbitron and ask him about my research knowledge. I can give you members of the MRC I have worked with, too. I can go back to Dr. Roslow, but, sadly, he is dead.

And companies which do "broadcast research" do incompetent or schlock work, which does not stand up to methological scrutiny.

---->>>> This is simply untrue. Unless you can cite widespread examples, you are just trying to make radio look bad, which seems to be your agenda.

Of course, as broadcast consultant with an undisguised online identity,

---- >>>> I am not at present a consultant.

I suppose you can't afford to tell the truth about radio research,

---->>>> The truth is that radio porgramming research, both perceptual and AMTs, is generally very well done by companies like Coleman, BA, Critical Mass, Edison, etc.

or to stray from the industry line and what your clients want to hear - a problem radio consultants and radio "researchers," in general, face.

---- >>>> My job is defined as being an "agent of change" and using research to prevent problems, spot opportunities and to keep things running smoothly whre neither of the former are required.

Somebody better get radio managers to face reality before it's too late. Listeners are leaving.

---->>>> No they are not. This one is provable. 25-54, the core or radio advertising and radio programming, is within a few tenths of a percentage of cume compared to a decade ago. They are not leaving. Where there is loss is in teens and 55+ that radio makes no effort to serve as they are unsaleable demos.

Advertisers are leaving.

----->>>> No, they are not. Radio is flat to up, depending on the month, in 2006. It iwll end this year up in low single digits. Just two years ago, for the first time, radio reache 8% of all national ad expenditures, a first since the early 50's.

---->>> Los Angeles, the largest radio ad market, will pass $1.1 billion for the first time this year.

----->>>>> So much for advertisers leaving.

Nobody is satisfied with radio. And so-called consultants keep tacking the money and enabling denial.

---->>>>95.1% of 25-54s use radio. This was nearly the same in 1986. People are obviously satisfied with much of radio, and are coming as much as ever. While time spent listening is off in some demos, it is not excessive given the profusion of alternative entertainment sources, the increase in hours worked per week by Americans (the headline of USA Today on wednesday of this week), and new leisure time activities. Radio has had challenges in the past, and has new ones now. There are lots of very good programmers, managers and researchers, despite your contention we are all morons.
 
25-54, the core or radio advertising and radio programming, is within a few tenths of a percentage of cume compared to a decade ago.
Cume is larger because total population is larger.

To be fair, I can make the same kinds of criticisms at a good of market research and - even more - at much of political research. The worst research is in medicine and health care.

The main point of difference is you appear to see terrestrial AM and FM as "radio." Some would limit the definition to commercial terrestrial AM and FM.

I see XM and Sirius as radio. I see Internet audio (wired, wireless or mobile) as radio. I see podcasts as radio. And I will see whatever else comes along that communicates audio programming to a mass audience as radio. They are all radio in the same way that cable channels are TV. The difference here is: Radio broadcasters got in on the ground floor of TV. And TV broadcasters (better late than never) eventually started operating cable channels. But radio broadcasters are missing the boat on new audio technology, in much the same way that motion picture studios ignored or fought TV. (HD Radio is DOA, not unlike spinnng wheel color TV.)
 
25-54, the core or radio advertising and radio programming, is within a few tenths of a percentage of cume compared to a decade ago.
Cume is larger because total population is larger.

---->>>> Bzzzzt. Ejected. I have been using percentages of the applicable universe in all cases, which allows comparison with ratings in 1950 should I want to make them. Where do you get this crap? The cume of raido in 25-54 is virtually the same percentage today as it was when Arbitron started to measure radio.

To be fair, I can make the same kinds of criticisms at a good of market research and - even more - at much of political research. The worst research is in medicine and health care.

---->>>>> And I am sure there are fora for those disciplines, too. I asked you to substantiate your claims, not to broaden your indictment of ressearch without any substantiation.

The main point of difference is you appear to see terrestrial AM and FM as "radio." Some would limit the definition to commercial terrestrial AM and FM.

---->>>> Radio is the wireless distribution of audio. The kind of transmitter used is irrelevant. I once had a commercial shortwave licence, as well as having programmed 5 XM channels for the first several years of satellite, so I am familiar with delivery methods and the variety that exist, from the theoretical WiMax to Eureka 47 to developmental technologies.

I see XM and Sirius as radio. I see Internet audio (wired, wireless or mobile) as radio. I see podcasts as radio. And I will see whatever else comes along that communicates audio programming to a mass audience as radio. They are all radio in the same way that cable channels are TV. The difference here is: Radio broadcasters got in on the ground floor of TV.

---->>>> Very few did. Only a couple of hundred TV stations were associated with radio in the 40's and the decade following the lift of the freeze, out of a universe of radio stations that was ten to twenty times larger.

And TV broadcasters (better late than never) eventually started operating cable channels.

----->>>> TV networks did. Very few TV stations created cable content other than their own off air programming (WGN, WTBS, etc.) Networks are content providers, and they plug into anything that has a screen at the other end.

But radio broadcasters are missing the boat on new audio technology, in much the same way that motion picture studios ignored or fought TV. (HD Radio is DOA, not unlike spinnng wheel color TV.)

---->>>> Since you are 100% worng on PPM, based on actual facts, I suspect you are wrong on everything else. In fact, if you make a prediction, I would put money on the results being the opposite. So I take this as a hearty endorsement of HD.
 
It's interesting how you twist things - what I say and facts - to suit your convenience.
Like most consultants, you are a liar.
 
fred flintstone said:
It's interesting how you twist things - what I say and facts - to suit your convenience.
Like most consultants, you are a liar.

You still have submitted no facts yourself to supporte your wild and vile accusations.

You did, however, say that KYW would drop in the People Meter. The fact is that the PPM was running in the market for two years, and KYW increased cume hugely, and shares slightly.

And I also explained that I am not at present a consultant.

You don't seem to get any facts right.
 
Re: I'm also wondering?

Mr.Eduardo, I do respect your background and achievements in the broadcast industry. But between the debate with you and Fred, has me wondering about radio's fate today. Yes , you seem to be good in backing up your facts, but statistics is one thing, and reality on the streets is another. I know in this world today, as far as the media and the government, you wonder who to believe.
You and me had a recent debate about the music industry, and when I seem to notice something, you come out the opposite direction. Your like a real estate salesman who has the 2001 mentality that tells the clients "Nows the time to buy" or "You better buy now", and as I look around the streets of my neighborhood and city, I see sale signs, reduced, or bloody murder "get my out of debt please".
Somehow you seem to have a very positive attitude of the an industry where everything is wonderful and what I noticed as once an avid listener and former broadcaster myself, is a dying fading , sell out of an industry. From the FCC to the recording industry, you can compare it to the Ford , Chevy syndrome.

Advertising for instance... I live in a top 25 market intertwined with a top 5 market and I noticed advertisers and commercial quality that now buys time on top 10 stations that use to get only as far as late evening, or Larry King overnight. Even the old sponsors Wolfman Jack had when he ran on tape from Mexico. Back in the 70's 80's it was 95% agency. I don't know if you noticed ,but you tell me. Lots of corny Hair, Home Business, Mystery shopper etc. like the Time Lifes on cable channels after 1 am. Is it me who just notices?

Air shifts cut , no more all-nights, half the weekends are VT or live. And the full timers running shifts like 9-4, 4-11:30, Board op, and morning drive 5:30-9. You get the pucture. What ever happened to 6-10, 10-2, 2-6 etc. and in major markets.

We had a discussion on music. Yes the world has been broken into charts. Like 50 of them , and me or the average person might scan around at least at one time 10 stations of varied pop/rock/ R&B music. Now I'm down to maybe 4 of them. And the current playlist sounds the same practically as it did from 2-3 months ago. Very tightly. even the songs I'll glance at whether it's CHR or Hot AC charts, i don't hear many of them played on terrestrial , and if I hear most, it's on XM. (It has gotten alittle better ) it was worse in the mid to late 90's and the millennium. Instead of a full mainstream audience that would rate them based on the programming and sales, now stations have to please advertisers and advertisers only because they got the clear channels by the throat, because they paid too much for their stations, which leads to the next subject of runaway listeners. They need there way of advertising desperately. Target only this and that.

Anybody I know or a stranger I might talk too, owns a IPOD, MP3s or some type of gadget and doesn't listen to the radio primarily. Maybe a morning show, but anybody like todays teenagers cruisin the street with the thump and boom effect I know it's not coming from the FM band. It's not Wolfman Jack. People I do get in discussions with when it comes to entertainment all tell me that they listen less and less to FM. Yes their are exceptions where you have KOIT or KCBS in the doctor's or insurance office. But there's alot of DMX, Music Choice, and other backgrounds going on. In 1974 or even recent as 1984, it would've been at aleast 90% FM.
Any way I can't go by statistics because every type of reports or statistic ratings seems to have a backlash like real estate, economy, jobs, and even the price of gas. You explain the price of gas where they shut down a part of the pipeline because of corrosion. You think the price would go up, no it's gone down. Now this situation might effect us in November, but it's like the price of the house, especially in today's economy, You never know what the real price is until you can sell it.
You mention a heritage station like KGO declining in revenue, and needs to convert to FM. Lately alot of talk radio has stifled, especially in the Bay area. Or I can say that people in the Bay area are no longer supporting the liberal party that KGO has promoted like they use to. Just like Air America, even though it's still number 1, it's declining. It should convert to FM to surviveor bebuild,... Yes I agree, but you are now agreeing that AM is dying. But advertising is up? Things are better then ever? I don't think anybody is sure or knows what's going on, until it hits like an asteroid.
 
Re: I'm also wondering?

Mr.Eduardo, I do respect your background and achievements in the broadcast industry. But between the debate with you and Fred, has me wondering about radio's fate today. Yes , you seem to be good in backing up your facts, but statistics is one thing, and reality on the streets is another. I know in this world today, as far as the media and the government, you wonder who to believe.

---->>>> Try the facts. There is data using the same basic methodology on radio listening using Arbitron going back to 1965. So if there was an erosion of listedning in the demos that are important to radio, then we could spot it.

You and me had a recent debate about the music industry, and when I seem to notice something, you come out the opposite direction.

---->>>> Refresh my memory. I don't remember that one.

Advertising for instance... I live in a top 25 market intertwined with a top 5 market and I noticed advertisers and commercial quality that now buys time on top 10 stations that use to get only as far as late evening, or Larry King overnight. Even the old sponsors Wolfman Jack had when he ran on tape from Mexico. Back in the 70's 80's it was 95% agency. I don't know if you noticed ,but you tell me. Lots of corny Hair, Home Business, Mystery shopper etc. like the Time Lifes on cable channels after 1 am. Is it me who just notices?

---->>>> Overnight advertising, whether in the 60's or today, has been a combination of a few attempts at revenue producing shows (Dolly Holliday for Holliday Inns in the early 60's and Art Bel et. al today.) but for th emost part, except for a couple of the clear channels, no station ever made money on Midnight to 5 AM. Remember, most stations stay on the air so the transmitter is verified as running just as morning drive starts.

Air shifts cut , no more all-nights, half the weekends are VT or live. And the full timers running shifts like 9-4, 4-11:30, Board op, and morning drive 5:30-9. You get the pucture. What ever happened to 6-10, 10-2, 2-6 etc. and in major markets.

--->>>> We all went with Arbitron dayparts for consistency. 6-10, 10-3, 3-7, 7-12. Overnights produce scant listening and no revenue, so voice tracking or a board op is a good alternative. Weekend evenings have nearly no listeners, so this is a good place for specialty shows, often syndicated. There are many exceptions... the stations I am with in LA are all live 24/7 but that is an individual decision. I still remember 1-14-94 at 4:41 AM, when our live jock on KHJ had the mike open during the Northridge quake and was the only voice in Spanish on the air 60 seconds later and for the next 6 hours.

---->>>> However, even in NY or LA or Chicago, it was never 95% agency. Lots of local and direct, including most of the car dealers, etc. Today, the hair remedies and re-fi accounts come from agencies, by the way. The US has changed, and there are a lot more product categories that like radio.

We had a discussion on music. Yes the world has been broken into charts. Like 50 of them , and me or the average person might scan around at least at one time 10 stations of varied pop/rock/ R&B music. Now I'm down to maybe 4 of them. And the current playlist sounds the same practically as it did from 2-3 months ago. Very tightly. even the songs I'll glance at whether it's CHR or Hot AC charts, i don't hear many of them played on terrestrial , and if I hear most, it's on XM. (It has gotten alittle better ) it was worse in the mid to late 90's and the millennium. Instead of a full mainstream audience that would rate them based on the programming and sales, now stations have to please advertisers and advertisers only because they got the clear channels by the throat, because they paid too much for their stations, which leads to the next subject of runaway listeners. They need there way of advertising desperately. Target only this and that.

---->>>> Radio began tight specialization when FM was forced to stop simulcasting in 1967. Since then, formats have split. CHR immediately split into CHR, AC and AOR, for example. This has continued as more stations came into each market, especially those outside the top 5.

---->>>> Very few cases of overpayment exist. Nearly every station bought during early consolidations (1996 and on) is worth much more today. And since most were bought with mergers and stock swaps, there is practically no debt.

---->>>> Playlists are a function of what listeners want. With so much specialization, the weekly 3 adds on a Top 40 in the 60's became 1 add each at the CHR, the AOR and the AC. The miusic business does not sell more due to fragmentation of radio. It just has each song played only on the stations that it fits. So there are probably more adds today than ever, but they are spread over several dozen formats, not just one or two main ones.

Anybody I know or a stranger I might talk too, owns a IPOD, MP3s or some type of gadget and doesn't listen to the radio primarily. Maybe a morning show, but anybody like todays teenagers cruisin the street with the thump and boom effect I know it's not coming from the FM band. It's not Wolfman Jack. People I do get in discussions with when it comes to entertainment all tell me that they listen less and less to FM. Yes their are exceptions where you have KOIT or KCBS in the doctor's or insurance office. But there's alot of DMX, Music Choice, and other backgrounds going on. In 1974 or even recent as 1984, it would've been at aleast 90% FM.

---->>>> TV was going to kill radio. And the 45. And the cassette. And cable and the CD. And so on . Personal music devices have coexisted with radio since the Victrola that plyed 78's.

---->>>> The change in 25-54 cume of radio since 1975 is less than 1%. It is way off in teens, and way off in 55+, because radio has no interest in either group as there are no ad buys to be had for that audience.

Any way I can't go by statistics because every type of reports or statistic ratings seems to have a backlash like real estate, economy, jobs, and even the price of gas. You explain the price of gas where they shut down a part of the pipeline because of corrosion. You think the price would go up, no it's gone down. Now this situation might effect us in November, but it's like the price of the house, especially in today's economy, You never know what the real price is until you can sell it.

--->>>> Radio revenues are up this year, probably between 2% and 3% only, but up. Lots of posts say listening is way off and advertisers are leaving. They are not. LA will hit $1.1 billion in billing this year, for example.

You mention a heritage station like KGO declining in revenue, and needs to convert to FM. Lately alot of talk radio has stifled, especially in the Bay area. Or I can say that people in the Bay area are no longer supporting the liberal party that KGO has promoted like they use to. Just like Air America, even though it's still number 1, it's declining. It should convert to FM to surviveor bebuild,... Yes I agree, but you are now agreeing that AM is dying. But advertising is up? Things are better then ever? I don't think anybody is sure or knows what's going on, until it hits like an asteroid.

--->>>> AM revenues are down in nearly every market. FM is up. It seems like ther eis slow growth, but FM is being dragged dwon in the averages by AM.

--->>>> Two years ago, for the first time since the '50's, radio broke into the 8% share of all ad revenue. That is not a symptom of a dead business. Are there threats? Yeah, but the Highway HiFi was a threat, too (the 16 rpm record player in mid-50's Chrysler cars) and radio survived.
 
Re: I'm also wondering?

Mr.Eduardo, I do respect your background and achievements in the broadcast industry. But between the debate with you and Fred, has me wondering about radio's fate today. Yes , you seem to be good in backing up your facts, but statistics is one thing, and reality on the streets is another. I know in this world today, as far as the media and the government, you wonder who to believe.

---->>>> Try the facts. There is data using the same basic methodology on radio listening using Arbitron going back to 1965. So if there was an erosion of listedning in the demos that are important to radio, then we could spot it.

You and me had a recent debate about the music industry, and when I seem to notice something, you come out the opposite direction.

---->>>> Refresh my memory. I don't remember that one.

Advertising for instance... I live in a top 25 market intertwined with a top 5 market and I noticed advertisers and commercial quality that now buys time on top 10 stations that use to get only as far as late evening, or Larry King overnight. Even the old sponsors Wolfman Jack had when he ran on tape from Mexico. Back in the 70's 80's it was 95% agency. I don't know if you noticed ,but you tell me. Lots of corny Hair, Home Business, Mystery shopper etc. like the Time Lifes on cable channels after 1 am. Is it me who just notices?

---->>>> Overnight advertising, whether in the 60's or today, has been a combination of a few attempts at revenue producing shows (Dolly Holliday for Holliday Inns in the early 60's and Art Bel et. al today.) but for th emost part, except for a couple of the clear channels, no station ever made money on Midnight to 5 AM. Remember, most stations stay on the air so the transmitter is verified as running just as morning drive starts.

Air shifts cut , no more all-nights, half the weekends are VT or live. And the full timers running shifts like 9-4, 4-11:30, Board op, and morning drive 5:30-9. You get the pucture. What ever happened to 6-10, 10-2, 2-6 etc. and in major markets.

--->>>> We all went with Arbitron dayparts for consistency. 6-10, 10-3, 3-7, 7-12. Overnights produce scant listening and no revenue, so voice tracking or a board op is a good alternative. Weekend evenings have nearly no listeners, so this is a good place for specialty shows, often syndicated. There are many exceptions... the stations I am with in LA are all live 24/7 but that is an individual decision. I still remember 1-14-94 at 4:41 AM, when our live jock on KHJ had the mike open during the Northridge quake and was the only voice in Spanish on the air 60 seconds later and for the next 6 hours.

---->>>> However, even in NY or LA or Chicago, it was never 95% agency. Lots of local and direct, including most of the car dealers, etc. Today, the hair remedies and re-fi accounts come from agencies, by the way. The US has changed, and there are a lot more product categories that like radio.

We had a discussion on music. Yes the world has been broken into charts. Like 50 of them , and me or the average person might scan around at least at one time 10 stations of varied pop/rock/ R&B music. Now I'm down to maybe 4 of them. And the current playlist sounds the same practically as it did from 2-3 months ago. Very tightly. even the songs I'll glance at whether it's CHR or Hot AC charts, i don't hear many of them played on terrestrial , and if I hear most, it's on XM. (It has gotten alittle better ) it was worse in the mid to late 90's and the millennium. Instead of a full mainstream audience that would rate them based on the programming and sales, now stations have to please advertisers and advertisers only because they got the clear channels by the throat, because they paid too much for their stations, which leads to the next subject of runaway listeners. They need there way of advertising desperately. Target only this and that.

---->>>> Radio began tight specialization when FM was forced to stop simulcasting in 1967. Since then, formats have split. CHR immediately split into CHR, AC and AOR, for example. This has continued as more stations came into each market, especially those outside the top 5.

---->>>> Very few cases of overpayment exist. Nearly every station bought during early consolidations (1996 and on) is worth much more today. And since most were bought with mergers and stock swaps, there is practically no debt.

---->>>> Playlists are a function of what listeners want. With so much specialization, the weekly 3 adds on a Top 40 in the 60's became 1 add each at the CHR, the AOR and the AC. The miusic business does not sell more due to fragmentation of radio. It just has each song played only on the stations that it fits. So there are probably more adds today than ever, but they are spread over several dozen formats, not just one or two main ones.

Anybody I know or a stranger I might talk too, owns a IPOD, MP3s or some type of gadget and doesn't listen to the radio primarily. Maybe a morning show, but anybody like todays teenagers cruisin the street with the thump and boom effect I know it's not coming from the FM band. It's not Wolfman Jack. People I do get in discussions with when it comes to entertainment all tell me that they listen less and less to FM. Yes their are exceptions where you have KOIT or KCBS in the doctor's or insurance office. But there's alot of DMX, Music Choice, and other backgrounds going on. In 1974 or even recent as 1984, it would've been at aleast 90% FM.

---->>>> TV was going to kill radio. And the 45. And the cassette. And cable and the CD. And so on . Personal music devices have coexisted with radio since the Victrola that plyed 78's.

---->>>> The change in 25-54 cume of radio since 1975 is less than 1%. It is way off in teens, and way off in 55+, because radio has no interest in either group as there are no ad buys to be had for that audience.

Any way I can't go by statistics because every type of reports or statistic ratings seems to have a backlash like real estate, economy, jobs, and even the price of gas. You explain the price of gas where they shut down a part of the pipeline because of corrosion. You think the price would go up, no it's gone down. Now this situation might effect us in November, but it's like the price of the house, especially in today's economy, You never know what the real price is until you can sell it.

--->>>> Radio revenues are up this year, probably between 2% and 3% only, but up. Lots of posts say listening is way off and advertisers are leaving. They are not. LA will hit $1.1 billion in billing this year, for example.

You mention a heritage station like KGO declining in revenue, and needs to convert to FM. Lately alot of talk radio has stifled, especially in the Bay area. Or I can say that people in the Bay area are no longer supporting the liberal party that KGO has promoted like they use to. Just like Air America, even though it's still number 1, it's declining. It should convert to FM to surviveor bebuild,... Yes I agree, but you are now agreeing that AM is dying. But advertising is up? Things are better then ever? I don't think anybody is sure or knows what's going on, until it hits like an asteroid.

--->>>> AM revenues are down in nearly every market. FM is up. It seems like ther eis slow growth, but FM is being dragged dwon in the averages by AM.

--->>>> Two years ago, for the first time since the '50's, radio broke into the 8% share of all ad revenue. That is not a symptom of a dead business. Are there threats? Yeah, but the Highway HiFi was a threat, too (the 16 rpm record player in mid-50's Chrysler cars) and radio survived.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom