• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KSJO Universal 92.3 to Drop Brokered Programming

Creative - not. 10,000 songs has been rinsed, lathered and repeated at every new station. And it's 10,000 songs, 400 songs repeated the same darn way! If you play 10000 songs why not play 2000 and repeat? How about some of Hank Williams' lost hits?

-crainbebo
If you have 10,000, why not play...10,000? I don't understand the point of telling people that a station has X thousand songs in the first place, if they only play Y hundred.
 
! If you play 10000 songs why not play 2000 and repeat? How about some of Hank Williams' lost hits?

Hank Williams does not appeal to today's country demo of 18-49. It would be a tune out, and only bring in a few 65 and over geezers while the prime demos would be going barf and changing station.

And, for that 18-49 demo, there are not 2000 hits. There are 200 or 300 prime cuts and maybe another 100t o 200 filler songs. That's it.
 
Oh, it's much worse than that! People outside of the south have traditionally discovered Country music at around age 35. If you figure that Hank Williams died in 1953 and add 35 years, that's still 96 and he died on New Years Day!
 
with the peaks and valleys of hilly SF, how is the actual signal in the city? I've seen the contours but reality is often a different story.
 
with the peaks and valleys of hilly SF, how is the actual signal in the city? I've seen the contours but reality is often a different story.

KSJO has no real usable signal in the city of San Francisco at all. Perhaps you can get it in spotty fashion in a car, but in homes and workplaces, forget it. It is a usable South Bay signal only.
 
KSJO has no real usable signal in the city of San Francisco at all. Perhaps you can get it in spotty fashion in a car, but in homes and workplaces, forget it. It is a usable South Bay signal only.

That's OK...not a whole lot of country music fans in the city. Same with NYC. The point is that this qualifies as a market clear for national agency buys.
 
That's OK...not a whole lot of country music fans in the city. Same with NYC. The point is that this qualifies as a market clear for national agency buys.

I don't think it helps them get on spot buys, but it will give them a market presence for network buys. With something like 35 Nash stations nationwide, they have some significant bulk at this point and are likely getting some decent buys if they deliver at a good price.
 


KSJO has no real usable signal in the city of San Francisco at all. Perhaps you can get it in spotty fashion in a car, but in homes and workplaces, forget it. It is a usable South Bay signal only.

KSJO has a weak signal especially if your around Market Street and Embarcadero in SF, blocking the signal from skyscrapers. I hear KSJO fine in the Mission District.
 
Could KSJO 92.3 raise their antenna and power from 32kw/136m to 50kw/150m? KSJO used to be 50kw/142m until 2001. It will create more coverage area if they raise their power to 50kw instead of 32kw.
 
Could KSJO 92.3 raise their antenna and power from 32kw/136m to 50kw/150m? KSJO used to be 50kw/142m until 2001. It will create more coverage area if they raise their power to 50kw instead of 32kw.

The station reduced coverage and moved to fit old market overlap rules. Were all things the same, the new owner might file to return to the previous license values and location. But in the intervening time, I believe other stations have made moves that preclude KSJO returning to full B status... otherwise, the current owner would have done it as they were not bound by market based ownership caps that caused the station to downgrade in the past.

In any case, a 50% increase in power would not produce a huge increase in coverage... it takes quadruple the power to double coverage.
 
Cumulus will try to snag 92.7 FM to augment coverage in the immediate San Francisco area, in my opinion.

I think Cumulus is maxed out after purchasing 92.3 frequency. Now Cumulus in SF owns 4am's and 4 fm's in the bay area. (KSFO 560, KNBR 680, KGO 810, KTCT 1050, KSJO 92.3 KFFG 97.7, KFOG 104.5, and KSAN 107.7) Now they owned 8 radio stations in the bay area.
 
In the largest markets, you can own up to five on one band and three on the other. I believe that Clear Channel is trying to change this to any combination of eight.
 
I hope the FCC will keep it, 5 each a station?

The market cap varies by market size and includes AM, FM and TV but not translators and HD services.

In the largest markets, the cap is 8. Maximum 2 TV, 5 for either AM or FM (but not both, as that would be 10 station!). So if a company like CBS has 2 TV stations, they can only have 6 radio stations in a market.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom