• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Cumulus' New Top-of-The-Hour Newscasts

If Cumulus, through their Westwood One network, wanted to create a new-sounding national Top-of-The-Hour newscast, they've succeeded. But I'm not sure I like it. All the Cumulus News/Talk stations are running it. ABC News is out as of the new year. (I wonder how drastically the ABC affiliate list has been cut? I don't know of any station in my region carrying it anymore.)

This new network is "powered by CNN" but they never say CNN on the air. Even if they use a CNN correspondent, they don't identify that person as being with CNN. I'm hearing it on 770 WABC NYC only when they don't have their own anchor doing the news, which means most nights after 7 or 8pm. Even overnight, WABC never takes more than the first two minutes. Also nearby, Cumulus stations 1230 WFAS White Plains and 600 WICC Bridgeport also carry it. WFAS used to carry a different feed than the one heard on WABC. I suppose WFAS was with the ABC Entertainment or Directions Network, while WABC was with the ABC Information Network. Now everyone uses the same WW1 feed.

The anchor starts by listing two or three quick headlines, then says his name. But there's no mention of a network. The writing is extremely fast. They get three or four stories in by the first minute, several with either an actuality or voiced by a reporter. But no story can go into any depth at all with this fast pace.

At the one minute mark, the anchor pauses briefly for some stations to break away. Then he continues for a second minute, also jamming four or more stories within the next 60 seconds. Then he says his name and a one-minute spot plays. WABC leaves after this spot every time I've heard it, even overnight. But sometimes WFAS and WICC carry the third minute of the newscast. Again it's four or more stories in the third minute. The anchor says his name again, and the final spot plays.

Sometimes I notice there's a music bed playing throughout the newscast. I have to listen carefully because I'm not always aware of it. Maybe they're still adjusting the volume for this music bed. The music sounds like a popcorn machine, something you'd play under a traffic report, not a newscast.

I know we have shorter attention spans these days. But these newscasts sound so rushed, I wonder what important facts they're leaving out? Suppose an eyewitness says something really dramatic but it goes more than four or five seconds? Then we'll never hear it. And because correspondents are so limited in their reports, they can only tell us three sentences, with usually no audio to accompany their reports. They might be in Moscow or Beijing or Washington but they're simply another voice reading us three sentences. They don't even give us an outcue. The anchor says "That's John Smith in Rome."

CBS, ABC and Fox have longer top-of-the-hour newscasts. And they don't give stations the chance to leave after one minute. Instead, they have alternate feeds with shorter newscasts. But I guess Cumulus doesn't want to pay for numerous newscast feeds. One top-of-the-hour report fits all stations, whether they want to jump off after 60 seconds or they stay for all three minutes of news and two minutes of spots.
 
Seems to me that people in NYC have two full-time all news stations, where they can go for more depth. Worried about missing important facts? Go to News 88. If that's not enough, they can go to WNYC. People who tune in to WABC aren't going there for TOTH national news. It's just supposed to be headlines. The goal is to get you back quickly to the regular local programming. The problem is that at WABC, the regular programming stinks.
 
I know we have shorter attention spans these days.

During WOR's failed attempt at simulcasting Elliot in the Morning they had Joe Bartlett blasting through the TOH news -- in fact it was pre-recorded with breaths removed! It sounded horrible.

I listen to KFI quiet a lot and have started wondering if the newscasts are time-compressed. The format (which I actually like) is to hit the news running -- no sounder, not even a beat between "________ has the news," and the start of the first story. There's no interaction between the newscaster and the host(s) and the pace seems faster than the rest of the show. I'm pretty sure I heard some time-compression artifacts the other day but I'll need to listen more closely.
 
The omission of CNN may be deliberate to avoid upsetting their talk listeners which trend more right wing. Your question begs the good point then of why brand it for affiliates and then not note it on the air. I think, possibly, the independent stations this product is also offered to might have the option of noting the branding but Cumulus isn't doing so for the aforementioned reason. CNN and the listernship of WABC are like oil and water. Not as much so as MSNBC would be, but close.
 
Your question begs the good point then of why brand it for affiliates and then not note it on the air.

I think the real intent is to focus on the local station branding rather than that of a cable TV network. Consistency of radio branding.
 
The omission of CNN may be deliberate to avoid upsetting their talk listeners which trend more right wing.

We had this same discussion regarding then-Clear Channel's importing of Fox News Radio: that it was a move to identify with a network brand. (Or in this case, not to identify with one). None of that is ultimately true.

This has to do with money. More specifically, spending less producing a service element that radio operators are not keen to spend money on, such as "the news."

Putting quality, brand name loyalty and trust aside, I can see why Cumulus did what it did. It no longer wanted to spend too much money (either paying cash or turning over inventory) on a network news service. Its new service allows it to take content generated by CNN (being paid for with a lower amount of cash) and spend only a few bucks on a rudimentary staff to package it. Its' quick, down and dirty, cheap and fills the time at the top of the hour with the headlines.
 
Its new service allows it to take content generated by CNN (being paid for with a lower amount of cash) and spend only a few bucks on a rudimentary staff to package it. Its' quick, down and dirty, cheap and fills the time at the top of the hour with the headlines.

That's one way of looking at it. Another is that branded news services, like ABC News or Fox News, mainly promote that company's brand and cable channel. The radio company is paying them to promote them. No need for Fox to buy advertising or make their talent available for interviews, when they can get paid millions of dollars to get the same results.
 
The CNN brand isn't worth much to most talk radio listeners.

Even if that's true, it's not the point. It's a couple minutes of national news.

If you run a big successful radio station, do you want to share that brand with some cable TV channel?
 
I think it adds cachet to the product. CNN once had a pretty good radio product. Some of the customers will carry the branding, others won't. An analysis of how that brand, CNN, would be received by its audience plays a role in that decision in at least some of the cases.
 
Even if that's true, it's not the point. It's a couple minutes of national news.

If you run a big successful radio station, do you want to share that brand with some cable TV channel?

If that brand can bring "prestige" to your station, sure. But the CNN brand adds absolutely nothing to radio news, so the answer is no.
 
If that brand can bring "prestige" to your station, sure. But the CNN brand adds absolutely nothing to radio news, so the answer is no.

You're taking this from a political point of view, not a journalistic point of view. CNN remains the first place people turn to when news breaks. Maybe not for conservatives, but for everyone else. And right now, Cumulus is looking to break away from conservative political radio. So the general audience has no problem with CNN. They may not watch all the time, they may not watch at night, but they watch when it counts.

Having said all that, the focus of this news service isn't to further promote a national cable channel, but rather promote the localism of the radio station. Thus, association with ANY national news source, regardless of the pedigree, doesn't benefit the brand.
 
WLOH, an independent station is one that also transitioned from ABC News to the Westwood One product. Dirk Van generally handles the daytime updates on weekdays. They are pretty good, but the segue needs some work, maybe 'Dirk Van with the latest headlines' or something like that.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom