-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
I am proudly biased against a so-called "news" network run by an established partisan political operative a/k/a Roger Ailes, who has made NO SECRET of his business model, which is to cater to conservatives. How do you do THAT? You spin news in a way that panders to them. Most intelligent and independent thinkers know this. You clearly don't fit into either category.
Stop being so naive.
Last edited:
You are twisting his words. You are not an independent thinker. You are a liberal who is attacking the only non-liberal network. NBC is in line with the Obama administration.
Same old tired BS from the right wing cranks: Anyone who calls Fox news out on what they are MUST be a liberal. LOL!
Pandering to this mentality is exactly what has ruined talkradio around the country.
So, you don't like talk radio and Fox News, yet you're not a liberal? You're also saying, "right wing".
I don't like partisan liars, not because I'm some "liberal", but because I'm honest. I also call them "right wing" because that's what they are. Regardless of what you call them, talkradio and Fox news are littered with them.
I don't like partisan liars on MSNBC either, but they're irrelevant. Al Sharpton is a racist, but nobody watches him so the damage is negligible, whereas Fox's cult followers are greater in number and they hang on every word, just as with talkradio---which is why their misinformation is so dangerous.
Last edited:
But they are old. The most recent data I've seen has them right at age 69 and this has been rising steadily-just like right-wing talk radio.
I don't know how a topic about a B-list former talk show host degenerated into a feud over Fox "News".
But I'll kick my two cents in: It seems that Fox's number two owner a "Prince" Al-Waleed has sold his stake in Ol' Rupe's NewsCorp recently:
http://www.theguardian.com/media/gr...rince-sells-5-of-his-news-corp-stock-for-125m
I suspect his advisers have seen those demos as well and know what is coming.
BTW: This is the very same Arab who sent $25,000 dollar checks to the families of suicide bombers over in the Middle East. Rupe keeps only the best company. What is that old mafia line..."it's just business, nothing personal".
LCG
Hmmmm...I wonder why Fox's talking heads aren't highlighting and carrying on about THAT little factoid? What say you, Hannity? LOL
Imagine if MSNBC was mixed up with that creep. Of course we all know Fox won't cover this because: A) their loyal viewers wouldn't believe it anyway, or B) they'd blow a gasket and stroke out...leaving no audience.
I don't have cable, but I do see Fox News at my friends and families homes at times. It is by far superior to any other news on tv, very balanced, topical, and respectful, not looking down on the people as that other side as being narcissists elitists always do.
I find it funny, those who attack Fox for not reading the DNC talking points each evening, are the same ones who defend the outright lies from Brian Williams and Dan Rather.
I disagree with the commentary on fox a lot, but it is nice to know that the host doesn't hate me and "see me as an enemy and wish me harm" as well the moutpieces for the commander who said exactly that.
lol @ Fox being "very balanced". And yes, some of their hosts do look down on the other side.
Fox NEWS, not the commentary was very balanced from what I saw, much more so than the liberal biased bull of the alphabet snooze fests.
The commentary had plenty of liberals on to counter the Conservatives. I don't think it is fox news fault that when liberalism is challenged it fails due to it being an oppressive controlling ideology where the truth, facts, and decency are not even a remote factor.
Look at Rudy, makes a comment about Obama and now all the James Holmes of Colorado theater fame lib puppets are making death threats against him.
I do not like the religious right, have no use for rush or hannity, but I take liberals at face value, I judge them on the facts.
The commentary had plenty of liberals on to counter the Conservatives. I don't think it is fox news fault that when liberalism is challenged it fails due to it being an oppressive controlling ideology where the truth, facts, and decency are not even a remote factor.
Look at Rudy, makes a comment about Obama and now all the James Holmes of Colorado theater fame lib puppets are making death threats against him.
I do not like the religious right, have no use for rush or hannity, but I take liberals at face value, I judge them on the facts.
Fox News isn't balanced. Period. And they don't have liberals on, they have conservative/moderate "Democrats" on, pushover types.
And LOL @ that garbage about liberalism being a controlling ideology where truth, facts and decency aren't even a remote factor. Nutbag conservatives are far, far worse, and it isn't even close.
- Status