• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

No translator filing window for AM's?

A couple of days ago, FCC Chairman Wheeler made a statement that there will not be a special filing window for AM stations to get an FM translator. That's despite the fact that last fall, they more or less said there would be one sometime in 2015. I'm surprised there hasn't been a lot of discussion about it. AM is in trouble and a lot of small AM stations could benefit from a FM translator. It's true, it wouldn't do anything to fix the RF sewer that the AM band has become, but it would help preserve the businesses that occupy that part of the spectrum. Since I own two AM stations, it was not the news I wanted to hear.

Assuming there will eventually be a translator filing window, this means that small broadcasters will have to compete with groups like EMF and American Family to get a small piece of the pie. It may mean an auction situation for competing applicants. That is likely to price the entire exercise out of reach for many small broadcasters. As it is now, existing translators have become a commodity and are traded like pork belly futures. Some of the prices are nothing short of obscene, and well beyond the reach of a small broadcaster.

Considering what happened in the last translator filing window I hope the FCC will be proactive in leveling the playing field. I won't hold my breath about it though. Most of the problems have been inflicted by the FCC, including the RF pollution of the AM band. They have been busy shaking people down for Quarterly Issues Reports, EEO filings, EAS violations, inadequate Political Files and other paper related infractions, while ignoring the bigger picture of responsible spectrum management and enforcing Part 15 rules as they apply to unintentional radiators like fluorescent lights, computers, HD side-bands and other RF polluters. They are the ones who have screwed this up. I think it is incumbent on them to fix it.
 
Why would the current leadership in the FCC be friendly to a medium (AM radio) that is largely made up of content that bashes their boss?

There won't be an AM translator window anytime in the near future.
 
Why would the current leadership in the FCC be friendly to a medium (AM radio) that is largely made up of content that bashes their boss?

To be honest, the FCC was even less friendly to AM when GWB was in the Oval Office. Also, the FCC reports to Congress. That's why they've been going up there so much lately. If Congress doesn't like the way the FCC is treating AM radio, they can over-ride any of their actions. OR they could pass some legislation. Except they haven't actually legislated.
 
A couple of days ago, FCC Chairman Wheeler made a statement that there will not be a special filing window for AM stations to get an FM translator.

A couple of Commissioners have talked about that idea, but I don't recall the full Commission saying anything about it.

The Chairman address this issue at the NAB yesterday. Here's what Tom Taylor reported today in his newsletter:

See what you make of this, from yesterday’s speech – “I intend to shortly schedule a vote on the solutions proposed to ameliorate the practical problems and interference-related issues that AM licensees have been seeking. I also intend to address how FM translators can be used to benefit not just some licensees, but all licensees, including new licensees, and how that fits with our statutory mandate to localism and diversity of voices.” Okay, now you’re entitled to say “Huh?”
 
Except they haven't actually legislated.

Not true by a long shot.

See what you make of this, from yesterday’s speech – “I intend to shortly schedule a vote on the solutions proposed to ameliorate the practical problems and interference-related issues that AM licensees have been seeking. I also intend to address how FM translators can be used to benefit not just some licensees, but all licensees, including new licensees, and how that fits with our statutory mandate to localism and diversity of voices.” Okay, now you’re entitled to say “Huh?”

I see that as "we'll vote on the technical stuff, but you're not getting FM frequencies".
 
I'm going to speculate that there will be another translator filing window, but they will throw the AM applicants in with all religious network broadcasters and the allocation speculators. It will make it much more difficult for AM's to be successful with their applications.

I hope the FCC learned a few things from the Great Translator Invasion debacle.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom