• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

AT&T pulls back on U-verse, pushing DirecTV

AT&T is phasing out the U-verse TV service as it pushes new customers to newly acquired DirecTV, a sign the company is giving up on once-heralded plans to compete head-on with cable through telephone lines.

AT&T has stopped building U-verse set-top boxes and is nudging prospective customers toward its satellite unit, which has lower hardware and programming costs. The shift is the first stage of a plan to create a "home gateway" within three years that will consolidate all AT&T services and act as a central hub to deliver video to any device.

Current U-verse subscribers will be able to retain the service, and AT&T is even offering new promotions to those who keep it. But new customers are being directed by its marketing department to choose the satellite package.

http://adage.com/article/digital/t-takes-u-turn-u-verse-pushes-users-directv/302689/
 
How did it take AdvertisingAge this long to find this out?

AT&T has made no secret of the fact that the television component to U-verse has always been the difficult one. It fades within a couple of miles of the CO, when it does work it takes forever to change channels, and no one has come up with an answer about the carriage agreements syncing up with U-verse and DirecTV.

Must be a slow news week at AdAge.
 
Here in Connecticut, AT&T sold off its Internet and TV services to Frontier Communications in 2014.I'm a cord-cutter, so never had U-verse, but I did have stand-alone AT&T Internet. The service is still branded AT&T (and "powered by" Yahoo), but I can access WatchESPN's ESPN3 content online -- the player says "powered by Frontier" when I use it. So does anything happen to us in Connecticut or is anything AT&T does from now on no factor here?
 
My daughter has U-verse. She lives in an apartment building in Toledo.
No way in heck her landlord is gonna let her put up a dish.
 
I have significant issues down here on the Redneck Riverea with rain fade on Dish/DirecTV. I've been meaning to switch to UVerse. Guess I'll have to live with the rain fade. 99% signal reliability my a$$.
 
My daughter has U-verse. She lives in an apartment building in Toledo.
No way in heck her landlord is gonna let her put up a dish.

You'd be surprised how federal law has limited landlords' ability to block same in the past decade or so.
 
https://www.fcc.gov/media/over-air-reception-devices-rule

Yep. As long as the renter has an area under their exclusive use like a patio or balcony and doesn't mount the dish directly to the building/roof there isn't much a landlord can do about it. When I rented I planted my Directv dish in a 5 gallon bucket with some quikrete in it. Then ran some flat coax past the sliding glass door to get the signal inside.

And I was far from the only one doing it. I would say half of building was doing the same thing. Though a few were using zip ties to tie the dish to the balcony railing. I used a bucket so the management company couldn't fault me for any damage when I left.
 
She does not have any balconies. My brother lived in an apartment building where the units did.
People would get a 5 gallon bucket, fill it with concrete, mount the dish in there and stick it out on the patio.
 
even then, you need a clear view of the South

That, of course, is a given regardless of house or apartment, rent or own. Federal law can't fix that deficiency if it exists (but wouldn't it be nice if it could?).

She does not have any balconies. My brother lived in an apartment building where the units did.
People would get a 5 gallon bucket, fill it with concrete, mount the dish in there and stick it out on the patio.

I still have my DirecTV dish on the roof of my building, even though I no longer have the service. My landlord told me he didn't care as long as no one drilled into the roof beams themselves, so DirecTV lashed the antenna mount to one of the attic air vent pipes with metal straps instead. Worked perfectly for well over five years before I cancelled.
 
... DirecTV lashed the antenna mount to one of the attic air vent pipes with metal straps instead. Worked perfectly for well over five years before I cancelled.

I am surprised that the vent pipes were solid enough so the antenna didn't twist. Most of those are plastic (hard or soft).
 
When I rented I planted my Directv dish in a 5 gallon bucket with some quikrete in it.

Those buckets sometimes leave rust stains if they've been there for a while. Either use plastic buckets or buy a "ground mount" and toss a couple of 20 lb sandbags on the bottom rung.
 
... DirecTV lashed the antenna mount to one of the attic air vent pipes with metal straps instead. Worked perfectly for well over five years before I cancelled.


I am surprised that the vent pipes were solid enough so the antenna didn't twist. Most of those are plastic (hard or soft).
This building was constructed in the mid-1950s. Metal vent pipes.
 


Those buckets sometimes leave rust stains if they've been there for a while. Either use plastic buckets or buy a "ground mount" and toss a couple of 20 lb sandbags on the bottom rung.

It was an orange 5 gallon bucket from Home Depot. I've never seen a plastic bucket leave rust stains.
 
It was an orange 5 gallon bucket from Home Depot. I've never seen a plastic bucket leave rust stains.

That's why I said this: "Those buckets sometimes leave rust stains if they've been there for a while. Either use plastic buckets or buy a "ground mount" and toss a couple of 20 lb sandbags on the bottom rung."
 
Verizon is also struggling with its FIOS service.

Last year, AT&T tried to get me to use U-Verse as an ISP. When we did the calculations, the service was slower than DSL. Remember the Slowskys?
 
Verizon is also struggling with its FIOS service.

Last year, AT&T tried to get me to use U-Verse as an ISP. When we did the calculations, the service was slower than DSL. Remember the Slowskys?

On the other hand, FiOS Internet is fast!! I started with 150/150 when I moved last year, and now upgraded to 300/300 and I consistently get even a little bit more on both upload and download times.
 
We'll see how it competes against Google Fiber.

FiOS is fiber, with a home (residential) maximum of 500/500. And it is fully here, now with millions of passes. Google Fibre is in almost an Alpha stage.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom