What incentive could they have to stop leasing? Surely, the Chinese government would have no problem with having its programming on a stronger signal. It might even pay Radio One even more money for the upgrade, don't you think?
Well, the WILD
facility is now worth more, and has to pay for itself. In order for an asset to substantiate itself, it has to throw off X amount of return.
*possibilities?
1.) Chinese might not be seeing a return on their investment (however, they measure it), and decide to end the arrangement. (One might remember Christian Science Monitorradio, Radio France and others...somewhere someone looks at the books and says can this money be better spent elsewhere?)
2.) Radio One raises the lease price and Chinese decide they are not coughing up more money for something giving them a dubious response.
3.) Radio One decides they can make
more money doing their own programming, either locally to some extent, or clearing one of their national formats.
4.) Radio One decides that in order to keep the value (re-sale?) of the new facility....they have to do something mainstream.
5.) Charles Clemons or some other local operator/pirate leases the time for much more money to do local programming.
Personally, I didn't mind when they were running CRI in English. I enjoy hearing World Services from other countries....as long as it is in English! (and the modulation level is reasonable! LOL!) ;-)