• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

TV content ratings that are inaccurate?

I think that some channels put a blanket rating on some shows regardless of the content. I've always thought it was odd that TV Land gives a lot, if not all, episodes of Roseanne a G rating. Granted, that may be right on some episodes, but there are some episodes with sexual content that should be getting a PG or 14 rating.

Also, the drinkin' and cheatin' songs were in country music long before Urban Cowboy.
 
Hulu gave me two weeks free, so that was an opportunity to watch the remaining episodes of the current season of "Nashville", now on CMT. I watched other episodes earlier with a free month.

I only saw a content rating once, though there may have been one other times. There was a stern "viewer discretion advised" with a TV-MA. However, I saw no offensive content. It was stated that Maddie had used some inappropriate language to a police officer, and by that I mean inappropriate for broadcast TV. CMT is cable. Still, I don't recall hearing anything. Maddie is white and her black boyfriend was pulled over by a cop for "driving while black". In other words, Maddie believed the cop had made up an offense and told him so, in a way that went viral as people were filming the incident using phones. There were nasty comments online, but I didn't actually read them. Was there anything in what I just said that justifies a TV-MA?
 
Related: IFC on Directv, and perhaps other "expanded basic" outlets like Dish or cable, shows unedited movies constantly, complete with language and graphic situations intact. I understand that the rules are different than what one experiences on network or local stations, but was surprised there was so much of this unedited content on IFC. I don't know how these are rated, but I assume "TV-MA/D/L". (TV mature, dialogue, crude or coarse language) Perhaps similar to "Conan", who slips in an occasional "sh.." However IFC apparently has no problem with the "F" word. On my directv, IFC is located right next to MTV. Parents hopefully are aware of this.
 
Last edited:
Back when Boomerang ran the 1972 syndicated cartoon Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, it was given a TV-Y7 rating. The material and subject matter in that show (infidelity, Alice wanting to wear a see-through blouse, etc.) definitely warranted a TV-PG rating.

Even when it's at its playfully naughtiest, Match Game repeats on Buzzr are given a TV-G rating. GSN still brands it TV-PG.
 
I think that some channels put a blanket rating on some shows regardless of the content. I've always thought it was odd that TV Land gives a lot, if not all, episodes of Roseanne a G rating. Granted, that may be right on some episodes, but there are some episodes with sexual content that should be getting a PG or 14 rating.
I missed this. Some years ago there was a series called "Roc" about a Baltimore garbageman. It is known for doing an entire season live. When it was in reruns, which I watched because I didn't see the first season, every episode but one got a TV-G. The one that was TV-PG had the word "orgasm" in it.

On the other hand, the AFI salute to Barbra Streisand (I think that's right) had the P-word and still got a TV-PG.

Harry Anderson starred in the TV-movie "Harvey" which was TV-G. He said SOB but not directly to anyone.
 
One show that I'd always thought had a misleading rating was Judge Judy. Almost all of the episodes of that show are rated TV-G even though some of the cases involve mature subject matter. Same thing back when Judge Joe Brown had his show. That show's content ratings might have even been more questionable since I've seen some instances where some of the people on that show would curse quite a bit. Even with the bleep censor, it was kind of hard to believe there weren't more TV-PG ratings on Judge Joe Brown episodes than TV-G ratings because of that.
 
I think that some channels put a blanket rating on some shows regardless of the content. I've always thought it was odd that TV Land gives a lot, if not all, episodes of Roseanne a G rating. Granted, that may be right on some episodes, but there are some episodes with sexual content that should be getting a PG or 14 rating.

I noticed last weekend that while the Roseanne reruns on TV Land showed a G rating on screen that Charter's TV Guide showed a PG rating. So there's even a difference between what the network shows at times and what shows on the schedule. :confused:
 
I want to know why Miss America had an L. I'm not even sure ... well, I guess when they ask them questions about major issues, the TV-PG is justified but I don't remember any bad language.
 
Sorry.....that was my snarky comment. I was not referring to the rating but rather the content of the shows. ABC got rid of their highest rated sitcom and replaced it with junk (IMHO).
Well, "Once Upon a Time" isn't junk, but it's certainly not as good as "Last Man Standing" was or even as good as it once was.

I saw nothing so bad (in terms of appropriateness for kids) about the content of "The Middle" (Axl's nudity was pixelated), "The Mayor", "The Goldbergs", "Speechless" (never a TV-14 before, I don't think) or "Modern Family". Some of those shows were shown as TV-G on my TiVo, which wouldn't have been right either. I haven't seen "Fresh Off The Boat" and don't remember whether it was included, but it wouldn't likely need a TV-14.
 
IMO, Family Feud should get a TV-14 nowadays. Some of the questions and answers are very dirty for a PG rating. And why is Judge Judy a 'G', when she constantly yells at them and calls the litigants names? Should have been a TV-PG years ago!
Also something odd. Comet TV (one of Sinclair's sub networks, airs here on KUNW 2.2) airs E/I programming on Saturday mornings. One of their programs is reruns of the Xploration Station show Earth 2050 (the block airs Sat AMs on Fox O&Os). You'll see a 'TV-PG' bug, which fades and reveals the 'G' bug that it originally got. How is an educational program PG?
 
That doesn't really address the issue.

Look, all of these things are voluntary. Including the viewing of objectionable content on TV. But some people feel they have to sue TV stations over content, even if they themselves didn't see it. That's the world we live in. We have Christian family values groups who insist that TV only show family content, children be protected in advance, and they went to the government for that. How do you handle that?

That is a great question! Why don't they just get the series on DVD that they feel are most appropriate, and stick to them for their viewing, instead of insisting that Washington change the regular stuff to be more sanitized for "the children" and "the family"?
 
That is a great question! Why don't they just get the series on DVD that they feel are most appropriate, and stick to them for their viewing, instead of insisting that Washington change the regular stuff to be more sanitized for "the children" and "the family"?

My parents exercised their authority over what TV shows I watched, though in their case, it was because they were convinced "junk TV" would rot my brain. I could only see The Beverly Hillbillies at friends' houses. So they weren't concerned with sex, profanity, or violence, per se. My mom was always home, but I realize there are now a huge percentage of "latch-key" kids who are home unsupervised. But IIRC, most TVs, cable boxes, etc. - have settings that allow parents to regulate the content their kids see.

So IMO, people who have religious or moral objections to some shows should regulate their own kids' viewing choices, and leave the rest of us alone to do the same in the manner we see fit. I'm really sick of judgmental moralists and religious zealots who want to impose their standards on me. All you have to do is look at the conservative southern states, where presumably the religious fundamentalists have more power and influence, yet the region has higher divorce, higher substance abuse, more STDs, more teen pregnancy, etc.

And let's not forget that most kids have smart-phones, and access to computers, where they can see videos of ISIS beheadings, hardcore kinky sex porn, and pretty much you-name-it. So we can all wring our hands over content on TV, but it ain't gonna do any good in the long run.
 
Last edited:
My parents exercised their authority over what TV shows I watched, though in their case, it was because they were convinced "junk TV" would rot my brain. I could only see The Beverly Hillbillies at friends' houses.
When I finally saw the first episodes of "The Beverly Hillbillies" it seemd like a quality show. But we all know where it went from there.

I want to know why "The Goldbergs" and "Modern Family" both got a TV-14 again.
 
My parents exercised their authority over what TV shows I watched, though in their case, it was because they were convinced "junk TV" would rot my brain. I could only see The Beverly Hillbillies at friends' houses. So they weren't concerned with sex, profanity, or violence, per se. My mom was always home, but I realize there are now a huge percentage of "latch-key" kids who are home unsupervised. But IIRC, most TVs, cable boxes, etc. - have settings that allow parents to regulate the content their kids see.

So IMO, people who have religious or moral objections to some shows should regulate their own kids' viewing choices, and leave the rest of us alone to do the same in the manner we see fit. I'm really sick of judgmental moralists and religious zealots who want to impose their standards on me. All you have to do is look at the conservative southern states, where presumably the religious fundamentalists have more power and influence, yet the region has higher divorce, higher substance abuse, more STDs, more teen pregnancy, etc.

And let's not forget that most kids have smart-phones, and access to computers, where they can see videos of ISIS beheadings, hardcore kinky sex porn, and pretty much you-name-it. So we can all wring our hands over content on TV, but it ain't gonna do any good in the long run.

I agree why I don't like The PTC that file baseless complaints to The FCC just don't like that they think their the gatekeeper of what is good & bad on TV all they do is read the riot act. I believe it's the parents job to use the tools not the government and really seems like the FCC has stop fining the networks.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom