• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Cross-Ownership Rule...bye-bye?

https://www.allaccess.com/net-news/...hange-draft-order-released-sho?ref=mail_recap

I'm sure Cox is all over this. I wonder what station moves will happen now, now that this looks like it's going away and Cox won't have to get any more waivers for its ownership of the AJC. Will WALR and WSRV and WSBB move in closer? What about WTSH? Does WTSH already count against the Atlanta market FM limits? I'm assuming that WXKT and WNGC would put Cox over the limit.

IIRC the rule for a market of Atlanta's size is 8 stations, no more than 5 in one band. Cox already counts WALR, WSRV, WSBB, and WSB-FM the last time I looked; not sure about WTSH.
 
WSBB-FM probably will move into town, as it's wanted to do for years. I doubt WALR and WSRV will be able to move.

What's stopping those two? A forced downgrade that gives up much more than it gets? I remember that Cox was contemplating moving both of those in, but at the cost of at least a two-class downgrade (C0 to C2 for WALR, C to C1 for WSRV) that really didn't get that much more coverage in the metro, IIRC.

At one point there was an issue with the two stations' coverage patterns city-grading each other (they come close but just miss today), but I thought that would go away with the demise of the newspaper cross-ownership rule. Otherwise WSBB-FM wouldn't be able to move intown, either.

Are there nearby stations that have to be protected that are presenting a stymie? I know that 95.5 has a third-adjacent short-spacing exemption with 94.9 and 96.1.
 
I suppose it's possible. WSBB jumped through hoops to get other stations moved and their COL changed. It was a major undertaking and took quite a while to happen.

Maybe one of the engineers who post here, MediaMan and WAVO, will give us their take on this.
 
IIRC at one time there was talk of 97.1 and 95.5 both going on the old channel 2 tower which IMHO is way too close to Freedom Parkway. WSB was there first. GA DOT was too cheap to relocate Channel 2, but that is another thread. With 96.7 about 23 miles away from the channel 2 tower I do not see 97.1 going on that tower. For some reason Cox seems to want be off the 97.1 tower completely. IIRC there were a couple of postings stating the 97.1 tower has issues. With the storms that blown thru this year, I can only guess that the tower is not in the bad of shape after all.
 
I suppose it's possible. WSBB jumped through hoops to get other stations moved and their COL changed. It was a major undertaking and took quite a while to happen.

Maybe one of the engineers who post here, MediaMan and WAVO, will give us their take on this.

WSBB already has filed for the move-in to midtown but the FCC can not grant it until the cross ownership rule goes away. So, they may soon have a CP there. While the station will lose coverage toward rural areas of Northeast Georgia, it will gain coverage west and southwest of Atlanta. I suspect most of the 20% of their total WSB audience now listening to AM 750 are in those areas of the metro and now will be able to get a FM signal.

The WALR move closer to Atlanta, begun in the flush radio market days prior to the 2008 crash, has largely always been controlled more by spectrum and the airport than the cross ownership rule. The area to locate closer to Atlanta t was greatly impacted by the closeness of the Atlanta airport..which not only limits the height of towers on that side of ATL but nowadays also runs into more restricted rules on FM interference to the radio systems used to guide planes into the airport. The 101.1 translator recently got slammed for interference to the aeronautical systems used by the airport. Only in the past 5 to 10 years have FM radio stations had to deal with the aeronautical interference if they located on existing towers. Prior to then, it only came into play if a radio station planned to build a new tower.

Presently WALR is even more restricted since they erred with changed FCC policy for city of license change which allowed the 104.1 I.F. channel 93.3 station to get an upgrade and a co channel station near Cleveland TN to delete a directional antenna pattern hemming in WALR and requiring them to downgrade from 100KW to 60kW, their original power level at the Newnan tower site. They have now filed to keep 100KW but off a shorter tower northwest of the present site. They will lose a great deal of their rural coverage toward Columbus, Macon and Alabama but will still cover the areas they need to plus they have the big signal 93.5 translator northeast of Atlanta which added coverage even to the former 100KW signal. Being number one in Harris County, GA has no financial benefit to WALR or any other Atlanta market station.

WSRV had applied for a site closer to Atlanta but it still recognized the rules required by cross ownership. They can move 97.1 much closer to Atlanta before they run into the protected area of 97.5 at Peachtree City. I've heard if they downgraded to a C2 (50,000 watts) they could get much closer in to Atlanta and since cross ownership goes away, they no longer have to avoid their city grade contour covering 100% of the corporate limits of Atlanta where the AJC is published. That being said, one could conclude that if Cox wanted to move WSRV closer in to Atlanta, it would have already filed for the permit and had it on standby just like they did with WSBB. Finally I've been told there is no truth to rumors there is a structural problem with the present WSRV tower. Furthermore, the load will be less when WSBB moves to midtown.
 
Finally I've been told there is no truth to rumors there is a structural problem with the present WSRV tower. Furthermore, the load will be less when WSBB moves to midtown.

Glad to hear that. I'd hate for ATL to lose one of its two full class C's and all that coverage.

TOSOTR is also on that tower.
 
Thanks for the detailed information, MediaMan.

When do you think that WALR will be making the move to the new site?

Don't know those specifics. Frankly they got really lucky this tower is out there. Its a 700 ft tower located in the very southwest corner of Douglas County at the Carroll County line. WALR will transmit at 198 meters above ground level. At their present site they are 346 meters above ground but the new site is on much, much higher ground. Ground level at new site is 368 more feet above sea level so despite the new site antenna being 485 feet lower to the ground than the present site, overall its going to be just 117 feet lower in the air due to the new tower site being located on much higher terrain. The new site is 15 miles northwest of the present one so the contour will shift about that amount farther north and not lose much coverage to the east or west. The loss will be on the south side of the contour, Macon across to Columbus areas.
 
The Federal Communications Commission voted today 3-2 to do away with the Newspaper-Radio and Newspaper-TV crossownership rule which prohibited a company operating a daily newspaper to also own a TV station or radio station serving the city where it's newspaper is published. WSB AM/FM/TV and the Atlanta Journal Constitution owned by Cox were grandfathered but additional radio stations it purchased, WSRV, WSBB and WALR could not place a primary (60 dBu) signal across 100% of the corporate limits of the city of Atlanta where the AJC is published. A few years ago, Cox filed an application to move WSBB 95.5 FM to its WSB-FM site in midtown Atlanta and the application was held by the FCC in pending status. Now that the rule has been eliminated, Cox will be able to build out the 100,000 watt facility. Also today the FCC eliminated rules which prohibited a TV station in a market with fewer than 8 voices owning a second TV station. I am not as familiar with this policy as the radio part but it appears to me that it will now be possible for Atlanta TV stations to own more than one station in the market.
 
I am not as familiar with this policy as the radio part but it appears to me that it will now be possible for Atlanta TV stations to own more than one station in the market.

Meredith already owns both channels 46 and 17, and Tegna (former Gannett; Tegna is an anagram of "GANET") already owns both 11 and 36, and both have owned them for a while.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom