• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

How Local TV Can Survive In An OTT World

http://www.tvnewscheck.com/article/105153/how-local-tv-can-survive-in-an-ott-world/format/print

Well there are plenty of strategies at this time though. I knew that some have formed joint ventues to create Newson apps. Some have resorted to made for app content to draw the viewers in.

Local TV can survive — even thrive — in an increasingly competitive, fractured video ecosystem if stations nurture and promote their brands like never before, according to speakers at this week’s Promax BDA Station Summit in Las Vegas.

Setting the stage with original research unveiled at the conference was Andrew Finlayson, EVP digital and social strategies at SmithGeiger, who challenged marketers to understand the threat — and the opportunity — in the increasing dominance of OTT.

“There’s a fierce battle for audiences,” he said. “The world is going video. You should be leaders as you have established video brands.”

Outlining her strategy for building a great local TV brand, including offering “Google-proof news” and keeping marketing local was Valari Staab, who rose from promo producer to become president of NBCUniversal Owned Television Stations.

“There are things about our business that aren’t consumer friendly,” she said. “Linear TV doesn’t give you exactly what you want at any given time. You have to have reasons for people to stay connected to you.”

Quoting Gloria Lee, VP of ABC affiliate marketing and promotion, who likened today’s TV consumer to a person walking through a casino and being constantly assaulted with things clamoring for their attention, Finlayson told marketers a TV station must aim to become that consumer’s best friend.

“Brands really matter,” he said. “Marketing has to change if we are going to survive. We can no longer just bag and tag. What we have to do is conversational choreography.”

Key challenges uncovered in SmithGeiger’s recent consumer survey:

84% of Americans have smartphones and those devices are never more than a meter away from their owners.

69% of Americans have access to SVOD services like Netflix, Amazon or Hulu.

64% own tablets and those devices nearly always live on the coffee table or bedside stand — right next to the TV remote.

47% of Americans use gaming consoles — “the gateway drug for young people discovering video online.”

Americans spend 50 minutes per day inside the Facebook universe.
Despite all that competition, there is good news in the data, Finlayson said.

While consumers spend eight hours and 13 minutes daily on one of several screens, four hours and 17 minutes of those are devoted to the TV set. “The big screen is still the biggest screen in the house,” he said.

What’s more, among the most popular types of programming, local news ranks third with 53% of consumers tuning in, compared with 62% watching movies, 54% watching TV dramas and 46% watching national news.

The challenge for marketers lies in how people find out what to watch these days. Word of mouth ranks No. 1, with 54% of consumers reporting this method of discovery. Channel surfing and Facebook ranked second, each with 44%. “If you don’t have a concrete, hour-by-hour strategy for marketing on Facebook, you don’t know how to do marketing these days,” Finlayson said.

Even so, 43% of consumers surveyed by SmithGeiger said they find what to watch by tuning to their favorite channel, while 34% find shows via promotional spots on TV.

“We are in the reminder business,” Finlayson said. “We have to keep reminding people we have great content on a great station.”

While 81% of DVR viewers will fast-forward through commercials, 55% will stop if they see a news promo, and 51% will pay attention to local news promos during commercial breaks.

“Make a commitment to these promos,” Finlayson said. “Don’t just run the same one over and over all evening. Make these the best promos on your air.”

The bottom line, Finlayson said, is that live, linear TV still matters but no one is immune to OTT disruption. “Your brand is under attack right now.”

To compete, stations could start with seven “actionables” designed to assure local TV’s place in a growing video marketplace.

Emphasize Your Lineup. Noting that consumers can now ask Alexa “what’s on NBC tonight and get the lineup as its answer, Finlayson urged marketers to “constantly remind people what you have on your station.”

Invest in reaching out via the smartphone. “Use the assets your network sends you and check out how ESPN reminds people about upcoming sporting events.

People don’t watch TV anymore. They listen to it while looking down at a tablet. “You have fresh compelling content but you have to get through people’s ears. This means your promos suck: same music, same boring voice-over, same anchor who just wants to go to dinner. You have to break through to the ear.”

Time shifting is reality, but linear TV offers something exciting: event TV. “The big shows you have on your air are what drive the conversation in America. Emphasize the value of watching live and use social media to remind people what’s coming up in five minutes.”

Use social signals — social media content is often about TV. “If you aren’t all admins on your Facebook page, you are missing out on the conversation we need to have with the audience every day,” Finlayson said.

Connect with your loyalists — the people who give you the most viewing. “Make them feel special on social media by targeting them with relevant posts,” and “use your anchors as recruiters.”
Get aggressive about promoting your station’s OTT experience. “Leading stations remind people that they are available on all screens.”
 
....and there should be a mandatory retirement age in local TV news. Hey it doesn't matter to me how old someone is personally but lets face it...most of today viewers like to see people younger than 50 on their newscasts. What CBS did here in Denver is a great example. KCNC let go their long LONG running weatherman Ed Greene in favor of a woman who is half his age. Of course it's sad for Greene but social media here is running wild about the woman who is his replacement. People want to watch younger people sad to say.
 
....and there should be a mandatory retirement age in local TV news. Hey it doesn't matter to me how old someone is personally but lets face it...most of today viewers like to see people younger than 50 on their newscasts. What CBS did here in Denver is a great example. KCNC let go their long LONG running weatherman Ed Greene in favor of a woman who is half his age. Of course it's sad for Greene but social media here is running wild about the woman who is his replacement. People want to watch younger people sad to say.

Mandatory retirement ages, other than in the military, IIRC, have been illegal since the 1980s.
 
The answer is to provide local content.

Problem is that costs money, which is something very few people who own stations
are willing to do these days. The only local content many of them seem to produce is news.
Hours and hours and hours of local news. Too much. I greatly upset a TV news director years
ago by telling him that not enough legitimate news happens in this town every day to fill up
all those hours of airtime.
 
The answer is to provide local content.

Problem is that costs money, which is something very few people who own stations
are willing to do these days. The only local content many of them seem to produce is news.
Hours and hours and hours of local news. Too much. I greatly upset a TV news director years
ago by telling him that not enough legitimate news happens in this town every day to fill up
all those hours of airtime.

I think "local content" is one of those things that people SAY they want, but really, they don't watch in significant enough numbers to make the expense worthwhile. Though I suspect this is why local stations in major markets now air hours and hours of local news. It's relatively cheap to produce, they can recycle the scripts and taped stories over and over again.

But local feature, variety, travel, etc? A few of these where I live in the Bay Area have done well over the years - I remember People Are Talking (local talk show) in the 80s and 90s, Bay Area Backroads (local travel), and those Evening or PM Magazine shows which mixed local features with syndicated features. Most of these are gone. Now there is very little, outside those huge blocks of local news. If anything, there are fewer of these shows than there were in the pre-OTT world.
 
The answer is to provide local content.

Problem is that costs money, which is something very few people who own stations
are willing to do these days. The only local content many of them seem to produce is news.
Hours and hours and hours of local news. Too much. I greatly upset a TV news director years
ago by telling him that not enough legitimate news happens in this town every day to fill up
all those hours of airtime.

That's how I feel there just isn't enough news around West Michigan for the hours of news that is on Fox17 other than an hour in the morning it's nothing but news. Then from 4PM to 7PM 3 hours of news I'm amazed how they do it and don't run out of stories.
 
I think "local content" is one of those things that people SAY they want, but really, they don't watch in significant enough numbers to make the expense worthwhile. Though I suspect this is why local stations in major markets now air hours and hours of local news. It's relatively cheap to produce, they can recycle the scripts and taped stories over and over again.
.

Local TV, particularly the FOX affiliates, are turning mornings into a model that resembles what radio has been doing for years. No one expects that an average viewer will stick around for more than an hour at a time. Station can recycle content several times over a four hour newscast, and avoid paying syndication fees for programs that require active attention by the viewer. People have to be using local TV news in the morning a lot like radio morning shows. The audio component of morning TV is every bit or more important than the video.
 
When you see the statistics in the OP, it's no wonder that TSL for radio is dropping. There are so many options and distractions, that even the best, most focused content is only going to hold your attention for a few minutes. Then it's time to check Facebook or email or YouTube or something else. I definitely am one of those who watch TV with a tablet nearby. So I'm in that statistic.
 
Where I live, there seldom is a lot of news (though when there's major news involving University of Tennessee sports, it comprises the entirety of the local newscast. That would be the perfect day for city council to pass something controversial because it wouldn't get covered). A lot of recycled stories, paid content, cooking, features, etc.
Local content? What did you have in mind? Plays from the local playhouse? How many viewers does cable access have?
 
When you see the statistics in the OP, it's no wonder that TSL for radio is dropping. There are so many options and distractions, that even the best, most focused content is only going to hold your attention for a few minutes. Then it's time to check Facebook or email or YouTube or something else. I definitely am one of those who watch TV with a tablet nearby. So I'm in that statistic.

Me too. And if I clocked my weekly hours of watching actual TV compared to hours watched streaming on my phone or tablet, I suspect it would come up 30% to 70% in favor of streaming. Last night, I watched Billions on HBO, but that was my only TV watching for the entire day...not a sports fan. Twenty years ago, my typical Sunday TV watching would have been all of prime-time, and at least a few minutes of the 11:00 news. Now, unless there is a live breaking story of some importance, I rarely turn on TV news. Similarly, I cancelled my subscription to the actual newspaper probably 15 years ago, now.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom