• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Josh Binswanger Gone from WBZ

And that company got out of radio. Not just news radio, but ALL of radio. If what they did was working, they wouldn't have sold the whole radio division. Maybe they're not as venerable as you think.

Entercom didn't have to sell WBZ. They could have kept it and sold one of the FM music stations. They didn't, and iHeart was very happy and proud to trade some very profitable music stations in other markets to get WBZ & WRKO. WBZ was treated badly by that venerable company. WBZ was a station neither CBS nor Entercom wanted. iHeart was willing to offer a spurned child a home.

BigA,

Thank you for weighing in here.

By “venerable”, I meant that both Westinghouse and CBS have had a long history in radio broadcasting. I always felt that, whether in NYC, Chicago, Philly, Pittsburgh, or Fort Wayne, a Group W or a CBS radio station was, for the most part, pretty well run, and made money.

But - I have to admit you have put forth above what may be the most plausible and convincing argument to date re the whole situation with WBZ.

I would have preferred CBS stayed in the radio business, but they didn’t. Entercom was only too happy to bolster its position and, fortunately for them, had the resources at hand to acquire the soon-to-be-discarded CBS properties.

My impression was that Entercom didn’t invest heavily into WRKO; they were all about their WEEI brand. So, given its less-than-stellar demographic reach and revenue, WRKO was sure to go.

Now I was also under the impression that Entercom could not retain WBZ, but I don’t fully understand why. Had they done so, they would’ve had in their stable: WBZ-AM, WEEI-AM, WEEI-FM, WAAF, WKAF, WBZ-FM, WZLX, WODS, WBMX; two AMs, seven FMs. OK, so that’s two FMs over the limit, and signal-challenged WKAF was an almost sure bet to go.

WZLX was expendable since Entercom had access to profitable male demographics via WEEI-FM and WAAF.

But WBZ-FM could not stay with ‘EEI-FM retained, so this became their ace-in-hand to trade for WMJX; this would afford them a solid female demographic, with WODS, WBMX, WMJX.

WEEI-AM probably costs them little-to-nothing to operate, save for the transmitter’s electric bill, and I understand there were some sports events that the station carried.

So, even with WBZ, that would bring their total to: two AMs, five FMs. And it’s not like WBZ would’ve been a totally unfamiliar entity, since they were keeping all the other CBS news/talk stations.

But we know WBZ (along with WZLX) went to iHeart. My question to you is: What do you think it was about WBZ that Entercom-Boston might’ve found undesirable? Was it simply because divesting WBZ would bring Entercom a nice tidy sum?
 
The WBZ of the venerable Westinghouse/CBS era was more to my liking, and I'm making no bones about it.

Radio of yesteryear was more to everyone's liking. You and WBZ are no different than the trend that is going on everywhere.

Remember radio billing went off a cliff and lost (almost) a third of it's revenue....most of which has not come back.

The world of Westinghouse/CBS is way different that the radio world today...and as much as we hope that the revenues and jobs will come back....they are not. iHeart has to operate WBZ in the world/market that it finds itself today. Not in never, never land of the long gone golden age of radio.

(My wishing that the Globe and Herald would come back with more content, features, reporters and pages, is not going to change the reality that newspapers have to live in now.)
 
My question to you is: What do you think it was about WBZ that Entercom-Boston might’ve found undesirable? Was it simply because divesting WBZ would bring Entercom a nice tidy sum?

No, they just know that AM radio is a ticking time bomb. They own enough of them already.
 
Wasn't there a bit about how one company couldn't own a majority of the revenue producing stations in town--thus Ent. couldn't keep both sports stations? Does WBZ (AM) make enough money that it would have put them
over a DOJ limit?
So Ent. didn't want yet another AM --but does WBZ (AM) make a half decent profit? Yes "news is expensive" to run, etc., but does it do half decent? Look what we have now with iHR owning 3 spoken word properties. WRKO has
local and syndie talk, WBZ is news and local (for the most part) talk while the syndie shows like Rush and Hannity are on 1200. Does iHR need all 3? If they could get rid of 1200 would RKO perhaps take some of the shows?

And what about the idea of moving news/talk WBZ to FM (and I'm not talking the HD radio simulcast on WXKS 107.9 HD2...would think quite a few people would prefer hearing the stream of WBZ AM). If Entercom kept WBZ AM and
figured moving it to FM would work, what station would have to get sacrificed--103.3 or 104.1? Certainly not Magic, which they got in the Beasley swap for Sports Hub. Or if iHeart thought WBZ (AM) was worth it, would they
sacrifice one of their FMs to move it there--something like 101.7, if they felt enough people would tune in on FM for news/Rea/Bradley Jay etc?
FM could be rather endangered too if people prefer other sources--such as streaming--for music, news, entertainment.
Thus the important branding of WBZ (AM)--people associate it with a long running station and would search for the stream of _WBZ_. If it were "Newsradio WIHR" would that pack the same punch?
 
Does iHR need all 3? If they could get rid of 1200 would RKO perhaps take some of the shows?

I think they know if they moved the syndie talk to WRKO, it would get lower ratings than it gets now. Looking around the country, iHeart tends to keep AM stations as AM, and not move their content to FM.
 
I think they know if they moved the syndie talk to WRKO, it would get lower ratings than it gets now. Looking around the country, iHeart tends to keep AM stations as AM, and not move their content to FM.

But WRKO is also AM (680), not FM (except for the simulcast on 100.7 HD2).
 
But WRKO is also AM (680), not FM (except for the simulcast on 100.7 HD2).

Eli,
I think what BigA meant was that it’s not very likely iHeart will either simulcast or move any of its AM news/talk to an analog FM main channel. Entercom has done this with some of its all-news outlets.
 
Heard Dr. Brudnoy on last night. It was like he never left..15y time flies.
 
Gee, I thought it was just me who thought this way. Full disclosure: I've never watched WBIN-TV.

Yet iHeart shows Josh Binswanger and Bill Marcus and Garo Hagopian the door?

OMIGOSH, IT’S CHARLIE SHERMAN DOING THE WEEKEND NEWS AGAIN ON WBZ!!!

Look, I’ve heard Charlie do both news and sports; terrific on sports, where he can be as emotive as he can be, but not a good fit for news. He’s better than the robotic-sounding Joel Stern from NBC SPORTS RADIO, whom ‘BZ has been using on weekends.

Sorry, but Josh Binswanger has far better delivery of news than does poor Charlie.
 
OMIGOSH, IT’S CHARLIE SHERMAN DOING THE WEEKEND NEWS AGAIN ON WBZ!!!

Look, I’ve heard Charlie do both news and sports; terrific on sports, where he can be as emotive as he can be, but not a good fit for news. He’s better than the robotic-sounding Joel Stern from NBC SPORTS RADIO, whom ‘BZ has been using on weekends.

Sorry, but Josh Binswanger has far better delivery of news than does poor Charlie.

I agree. Charlie's good on sports, terrible delivery of news
 
I agree. Charlie's good on sports, terrible delivery of news

Dang, even now that Nicole Davis has thankfully returned from medical leave, and it's wonderful to hear her voice again, she has been alternating her daypart with none other than CHARLIE SHERMAN (!) OMIGOSH. Ugh. Why couldn't she be sharing her daypart with (in no particular order): Art Cohen, Tina Gao, Garo Hagopian, Josh Binswanger, Doug Cope. Yes, I'm aware the latter three are no longer with WBZ, and I'm probably being a weenie about this, but, geesh CHARLIE (!) should be doing sports mid-days, afternoons, weekends, whatever.
 
Dang, even now that Nicole Davis has thankfully returned from medical leave, and it's wonderful to hear her voice again, she has been alternating her daypart with none other than CHARLIE SHERMAN (!) OMIGOSH. Ugh. Why couldn't she be sharing her daypart with (in no particular order): Art Cohen, Tina Gao, Garo Hagopian, Josh Binswanger, Doug Cope. Yes, I'm aware the latter three are no longer with WBZ, and I'm probably being a weenie about this, but, geesh CHARLIE (!) should be doing sports mid-days, afternoons, weekends, whatever.

Not being a weenie. I tuned in over the weekend and had switch after listening to Charlie Sherman for less than 5 minutes. He has such an odd delivery.
 
Dang, even now that Nicole Davis has thankfully returned from medical leave, and it's wonderful to hear her voice again, she has been alternating her daypart with none other than CHARLIE SHERMAN (!) OMIGOSH. Ugh. Why couldn't she be sharing her daypart with (in no particular order): Art Cohen, Tina Gao, Garo Hagopian, Josh Binswanger, Doug Cope. Yes, I'm aware the latter three are no longer with WBZ, and I'm probably being a weenie about this, but, geesh CHARLIE (!) should be doing sports mid-days, afternoons, weekends, whatever.

The new midday co-anchor started today.

https://twitter.com/jimmackayonair/status/1123585962196512770?s=12
 
Not being a weenie. I tuned in over the weekend and had switch after listening to Charlie Sherman for less than 5 minutes. He has such an odd delivery.

Here's a thought: maybe they could pair him with either The Kuhner Man or VB over on 'RKO; talk about "odd deliveries"!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom