My other issue with ESPN Seattle is a complete lack of audio quality. So many interviews are almost impossible to understand due to bad quality...whether it is in a locker room , or even a pure interview, the audio quality sucks on this station big-time, most of the time. I am surprised a top 20 market sports station allows such bad quality audio on the air. Areas for improvement, IMO.
My other issue with ESPN Seattle is a complete lack of audio quality. So many interviews are almost impossible to understand due to bad quality...whether it is in a locker room , or even a pure interview, the audio quality sucks on this station big-time, most of the time. I am surprised a top 20 market sports station allows such bad quality audio on the air. Areas for improvement, IMO.
I don't know about the specifics or if this refers to the particular station, but ESPN radio uses a lot of audio gathered by its TV crew, and the audio standards aren't the same for TV. That's just the nature of the business. Locker room interviews in particular can be an audio nightmare. I personally once interviewed a player in the shower because he dodged us in the locker room. The audio was awful, but we got an exclusive. Sometimes the content is more important than the quality. The tradition of locker room interviews goes back to the print days, where audio quality wasn't important. The coaches press conferences are a different story. That is a formal location. Some teams circulate a mic so reporters' questions can be heard. It's all about context. I think now, with people recording interviews on their phone (for convenience, not quality), things won't be getting better in that regard.
So those generalizations don't apply but it's excusable when Google searches are the basis for posts.
No Google search here. Just responding to a specific post by someone other than you. If you read past my first sentence, everything else applies to any local sports station. The issues of covering live sports is not unique to Seattle. It's all about context.
I felt my comments on Clayton were a bit harsh. I think he is a major asset to espn Seattle overall and acknowledge his roots are a print reporter, not radio.
A Seattle Book Blogger, Peter Miller, wrote this
Only on this board can a thread originate about someone going into retirement then shift to a morning show in Port Townsend.
Hey, at least the thread stayed in the general vicinity. There's been times where threads about local stations go to someone comparing smooth jazz ratings in Ft. Myers, Florida.
The Groz is still going to be doing some daily phone drops on 710, his (and his wife's) production company still are buying time on sister station 770/94.5 for Seattle U Basketball broadcasts. I doubt he will suddenly "pop up" on rival KJR. That time has long passed. I don't think iHeart is in the mood to expend a ton of cash on more talent.
Plus, Grosby signed a new contract for the scaled back role with 710 ESPN.
So he is retiring but not really retiring? Sounds like a PR stunt to me. Nice job, Bonneville.
"So he is retiring but not really retiring? Sounds like a PR stunt to me. Nice job, Bonneville."
Health issues, not that its any of your business...
Any public figure in media is always the consumer's business. I don't think when we start talking about media figures their health issues are immune from comment. So, yes, as a consumer of media, it is indeed my business.