B
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
Looks like raw, unweighted data. Either that or WYRK had a monumental fall.
There seems to be some disparity between existing contracts and the monthly reporting of topline numbers on Nielsen ratings. The Top Line 12+ ratings listed by Nielsen show that some companies - namely Cumulus and WECK locally - didn't sign on to the monthly rolling average in time for the last release on October 15th that covered July-Sept. It will be interesting to seen who's listed for the Aug-Sept-Oct period released in November.
There seems to be some disparity between existing contracts and the monthly reporting of topline numbers on Nielsen ratings. The Top Line 12+ ratings listed by Nielsen show that some companies - namely Cumulus and WECK locally - didn't sign on to the monthly rolling average in time for the last release on October 15th that covered July-Sept. It will be interesting to seen who's listed for the Aug-Sept-Oct period released in November.
Yes, I believe anything labeled as a "trend" is unweighted.
B
Buddy Shula
Guest
These numbers are unweighted WECK will be in next weeks numbers most likely at a 3.3 , top ten.
We began subscribing to the stupid new Neilson system in sept but they got the date wrong.
NIELSEN
I'll betcha they cash the check from Buddy no matter how he spells it.
- Status