https://radioinsight.com/headlines/...romotes-scott-mahalick-to-operations-manager/
Also in the report Hubbard has Scott Mahalick to Operations Manager.
Also in the report Hubbard has Scott Mahalick to Operations Manager.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
Hubbard Seattle Appoints Wheeler Morris As VP/Market Manager
- Thread starter Y2kTheNewOldies
- Start date
That's how things work in a family company. Similar situation with Beasley.
I remember working in a situation like that, and you never forget that he's the CEO's son.
Yep that's what I mean. He's more than just a market manager.
I'm curious (if anyone is willing to share) what life is like at Hubbard vs. the days of Sandusky? Was it step-up or step-down in corporate culture?
I can't speak other than from a sideline perspective: My impression, is that Hubbard is a very well-run broadcast company. As BigA said; it's one of the few remaining family-run broadcast groups in the country. The structure reminds me a lot of familiar Northwest-based broadcast companies like King Broadcasting, Ackerley, and to an extent, Fisher. Hubbard has a stable of very successful and profitable stations, including the number one billing station; WTOP.
Hearing from folks that I know work there, seem to indicate a fair and professional culture. They have employees working in various markets who have been with the company since the beginning. Their corporate structure is fairly small and attentive, although there are management layers at each division or market. I've never heard any monikers against Hubbard like ("Cheap Channel", "iHeartless", or whatever).
Sandusky was primarily a commercial real estate company, which had a few radio stations. Capital was tight, with everything done on a shoestring. I remember the former CE from Sandusky, practically having to beg to replace the 20 year old backup generator at Cougar Mt. They finally gave in, but ended up purchasing a generator from a cancelled order, equipped with a woefully small fuel tank. I think it was only like 50 gallons, where all the other stations on Cougar had 250-500 gallon fuel tanks.
Last edited:
Or it could be leftover from any business.
OK That was vague, however I have known very qualified people who have applied for positions there and did not get the gig, people less qualified did get the gig. Of course less qualified equals less salary expectation.
Same goes for Entercom... And yeah I guess a lot of businesses go for the cheaper rather than the most qualified people.
That says what it says about the operation and its management philosophy.
Same goes for Entercom... And yeah I guess a lot of businesses go for the cheaper rather than the most qualified people.
That says what it says about the operation and its management philosophy.
Maybe....depends on the position. My philosophy has always been that starting salary means nothing compared to potential.
By the same token, Hubbard is not the kind of company that digs a hole it can't get out of. Can't say that about everyone else.
So I guess we know who works for Hubbard. That's cool. Best of everything to you and everyone there.
I Heart, if that is who you are referring to, certainly can dig holes and still inch along... While also phasing out anyone getting paid what they might be worth in experience in favor of the young, less experienced, and cheap.
It seems to be how the business rolls these days. I expect it from IHM and ETM, but not so much from a private company that doesn't have the investment bankers to pay in addition to salaries.
I Heart, if that is who you are referring to, certainly can dig holes and still inch along... While also phasing out anyone getting paid what they might be worth in experience in favor of the young, less experienced, and cheap.
It seems to be how the business rolls these days. I expect it from IHM and ETM, but not so much from a private company that doesn't have the investment bankers to pay in addition to salaries.
Not me...never have. But I have worked for family companies, so I know what that's about.
Sometimes the person with the best potential is the one that expects to earn less. Those that may have less experience might be less opinionated and ready to learn a specific company's routine and standards.
The second best station I ever ran went on the air with no experienced jocks. They ranged from our janitor's brother to a club host and a music composer and writer. 21 days later in a 30 station market it had a 21 share, nearly double the #2 station...
... so I have always looked for promise, not just experience. I'll bet that a smaller company does that, too.
You'd be surprised. From what I hear the politicking and back-stabbing can be more frequent at the privates than the publically-traded outfits.
These days that's true. My wife works for a major hospital group. In spite of everything going on, even hospitals aren't interested in hiring seasoned employees that rightfully expect a salary commiserate with their experience. More appealing is someone right out of college, who are just looking for work and an opportunity to move up the ladder. Besides the savings, the employee with less experience is typically more flexible, and adaptable to the organization and potentially new workflows.
If you're trying to get your foot in the broadcasting door in this market as a newbie to broadcasting, Hubbard Seattle is one of the few places that you will be able to do that. Obviously, I would imagine that you could probably expect no more than minimum wage, of course.
- Status