• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KROX may not move south after all

I could not pick up 91.3. All I got was KZLV or KNCT.
 
Their construction permit to move the signal South has expired on March 9th. https://fccdata.org/?lang=en&facid=54659
Unless they refile, I don't think it's moving near San Marcos.
Meanwhile it looks like 91.3 from Kyle is now on the air. Can anyone tell what it's playing? https://fccdata.org/?facid=&call=k2...=&lmspl=&party_type=LICEN&latd=&lond=&lang=en

I heard 101X in Austin last Friday night. It came in clear for about ten minutes.

I was kind of hoping this was due to a boost in signal from a tower further south, but it was probably only tropoducting.
 
Their construction permit to move the signal South has expired on March 9th. https://fccdata.org/?lang=en&facid=54659
Unless they refile, I don't think it's moving near San Marcos.
Meanwhile it looks like 91.3 from Kyle is now on the air. Can anyone tell what it's playing? https://fccdata.org/?facid=&call=k2...=&lmspl=&party_type=LICEN&latd=&lond=&lang=en

91.3 is airing "Radio Aleluya" Spanish Christian programming based in Houston. Waterloo can always refile for the upgrade to KROX-FM at a later time, as long as a co-channel or adjacent facility doesn't apply for a modification of its own. I highly suspect you have not heard the last regarding this proposal.
 
Waterloo Media is starting to look like an awful company... first they took away the mighty great KGSR 93.3 signal. Then they decided to move KBPA 103.5 from San Marcos to Austin. Now they decided NOT to move KROX 101.5 to the Buda transmitter that KBPA will be leaving soon.

*This will leave San Marcos without a perfectly clear Austin signal, meaning a station with zero interference/static on your radios.*

I emailed them to ask if they are still planning to re-file to move KROX to Buda, but I never got a response. This was 2 weeks ago.

How sad.

(I posted this previously)
 
Waterloo Media is starting to look like an awful company... first they took away the mighty great KGSR 93.3 signal.

I thought that was one of the last things Emmis did before selling its interest in the cluster to Waterloo/Sinclair Telecable. I could understand the logic, but Star 93.3 sounded a lot older than iHeart's "Breeze" or Entercom's "Sound." That didn't sound like the right fit for Austin, and the current hot AC format doesn't make much sense to me either. Mix 94.7 is very well-programmed and isn't likely to be beaten by what sounds like a mostly voicetracked competitor. Of course, the one thing I'll say to Waterloo's defense on that is that I'm not sure what I'd do with 93.3 if I were running that cluster.

Then they decided to move KBPA 103.5 from San Marcos to Austin.

This decision wasn't particularly dumb. KBPA will cover Williamson County, which is where Austin's most recent growth is, better and will cover roughly half of San Marcos with a citygrade signal and nearly all of Hays County with a 60 dBu signal. From a radiogeek's perspective, seeing a strong signal like 103.5 move further into town and making a slight downgrade in power and tower height is disappointing, but it's a good move from a business standpoint.
 
Kent is right, the decision to move KBPA was not dumb at all (although the filing makes it sound as though they didn't have much of a choice). Even though Hays County is growing quickly, it is only a fraction of the population of Travis County where the new antenna will be located and this move will also help the station in Williamson County which is also substantially more populated than Hays. It will greatly reduce the signal in Comal, Guadalupe, and Caldwell counties, but the first two those are in the San Antonio market, not Austin, and Caldwell is very rural and sparsely populated. This is a great upgrade for 103.5 (and a move of 101.5 to that tower in my opinion would have been a overall downgrade despite "upgrading" from a C2 to a C1).

I think the move of 93.3 is slightly more nuanced, but is probably still a net positive. Even if it is a downgrade to a C2, the location is just so much closer to the center of the market's population that i understand how you can justify it. I'm curious to those in Austin though, which is the better signal, 93.3 or 98.9? 93.3 is where 98.9 used to be located, prior to downgrading to a C3. On paper 93.3 should be better, but in actual listening, i'm not so sure.

As for Star, I agree it is kind of a mess. The soft ac also seemed to me to be out of place in the market. The new Hot AC/CHR hybrid is... not there yet. They kept the old branding and so it feels old and incongruent even though the playlist if mostly new. I'm not really sure there is anything obvious for them to switch to though. I would love to see 590 get a full FM signal some day.
 
*This will leave San Marcos without a perfectly clear Austin signal, meaning a station with zero interference/static on your radios.*

There's KZOS-LP run by the City of San Marcos itself on 103.1. They play everything with more variety than Bob FM, but more country. https://tunein.com/radio/KZOS-LP-1031-s113621/
Notice TuneIn incorrectly has the station's city as "Austin". The signal does come from the north of San Marcos as far as I know, so they may or may not be right.
 
KZOS is owned by the City of San Marcos specifically to be there to communicate emergency information. San Marcos and other communities nearby have had some pretty devastating floods. They're not after listeners with their format but rather to fill with something until there is an emergency.
 
Maybe they're not moving as it's probably very dangerous for tower riggers to climb towers and install antennas. IDK.
 
Maybe they're not moving as it's probably very dangerous for tower riggers to climb towers and install antennas. IDK.

That is a misconception. If proper procedures and engineering are involved, tower construction is very safe.

There are hundreds of thousands of towers in the US, used by cellular, two-way communications, relay services, radio stations, TV channels and all kinds of other audio and video transmission. How many people are injured each year working on them?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom