• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Channel 93.3 Files to Move to La Jolla

DavidEduardo said:
Yet when 107.1 had a "casualty" at its location on the slope up to the Mt Wilson peak, it operated from the "Wilson" site with reduced power for a while. Of course, keep in mind that that whole mountain range is a series of relatively small humps and peaks... or terrain variations... which have been given their own name.

My "own" mountain is indistinguishable from surrounding ones except for some lower points in a long ridge.

https://www.summitpost.org/mount-gleason/304677
Click to expand...
Yes, Mt. Wilson is part of the same San Gabriel range where 107.1 transmits from. But the Mt. Wilson transmitters are many miles away from (and thousands of feet higher than) the 107.1 antenna.

Again, please name at least one site in California where two Class B's at essentially the same location have less than a four-channel separation. Just to bring this topic back to San Diego, that's why I don't think KGB/101.5 and KLVJ/102.1 can transmit from the same place.
 
Signal Geek said:
Yes, Mt. Wilson is part of the same San Gabriel range where 107.1 transmits from. But the Mt. Wilson transmitters are many miles away from (and thousands of feet higher than) the 107.1 antenna. .
Click to expand...

This is essentially a matter of the table of allocations.

In most populated areas, the C's or B's were space at the standard separations, based on engineering and FM receivers that were prevalent in the early 60's. Docket 80-90 changed that a bit by allowing move-ins, often close to existing full power B's or C's.

I always thought that none got on the same site or tower because of the minimum signal needed over the COL. I can't find any rule that precluded stations that are otherwise compliant from not being in the same vicinity.

In LA, the A's and the B's are have just one "empty" between them. SD was set up that way, too.

Beyond this, I have to say, "Paging Mr. Fybush, Paging Mr. Fybush, Code Orange in the Allocations Department".
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom