• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KREV-FM sold

Don't know about KREV, and the Desert station, but the Webstream for 104.3 Las Vegas is still active, the station is playing a mix of straight CHR and EDM mixes, and someone keeps paying the stream provider to keep it running (at least I would think so)
 
I knew there was a Kettle is black argument out there for stolz. I swear in some of the things I heard of Stolz accused Entercom's Sacramento operations for the same thing at one point when the KDND-FM license dispute was at play.
 
Crazy Ed Stolz has been sentenced to jail and a warrant for his arrest has been issued. Good luck Ed with running KBET, Las Vegas from your cell.

When Ayn Rand is your blueprint to running a business, there's no rules to follow.
 
I wonder if he actually spent the night in jail?

Here's the filing he made (from Frequency1's link):

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Royce International Broadcasting Corporation (“Royce”) and Silver State Broadcasting, Inc. (“Silver State”) (together, “Petitioners”), by their attorney, hereby request a ten-business day extension of time within which to respond to the “Opposition to Petition to Deny” filed on February 18, 2021, on behalf of W. Lawrence Patrick, Receiver (the “Receiver”) and the “Reply to Supplement to Petition to Deny” also filed on behalf of the Receiver, on February 23, 2021. With respect thereto, the following is stated:

As reported to the FCC on February 19, 2021 , the Receiver in this case is engaging in
what is believed to be inappropriate behavior, by seeking an Order from the Judge presiding in California, Eastern Division, requiring the parties in this proceeding to literally dismiss the Petition to Deny current pending before the FCC. For the reasons stated in the Supplement, it is Petitioners’ position that this attempt on the part of the Receiver to totally avoid FCC is contrary to Commission and judicial precedent. The controlling case in this area is Radio Station WOW v. Johnson, 326 U.S. 120 (1945), which was a case concerning the relationship of the FCC to the power of a local court. In that case, Supreme Court of Nebraska had attempted to order a party "to do all things necessary" to secure the assignment of the license back to the predecessor licensee. That ruling by the Supreme Court of Nebraska was rejected by the United States Supreme Court. Id. at 130. As the Supreme Court stated:
it is urged that by ordering the parties "to do all things necessary" to secure a return of the license to the defrauded Society, the State court invaded the Commission's function.
****
[W]e think the court went outside its bounds when it ordered the parties "to do all things necessary" to secure a return of the license. Plainly that requires the Society to ask the Commission for a retransfer of the license to it and requires WOW not to oppose such transfer.... nsofar as the Nebraska decree orders the parties "to do all things necessary" to secure the return of the license, it hampers the freedom of the Society not to continue in broadcasting and to restrict itself, as it properly may, to its insurance business. Equally does it prevent WOW from opposing a return to the Society... These are restrictions not merely upon the private rights of parties as to whom a State court may make appropriate findings of fraud. They are restrictions upon the licensing system which Congress established. It disregards practicalities to deny that, by controlling the conduct of parties before the Communications Commission, the court below reached beyond the immediate controversy and into matters that do not belong to it.

(Full PDF attached)
 

Attachments

  • Motion_for_Extension_of_Time.pdf
    58.5 KB · Views: 1
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom