• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KYW No Longer Says "1060", Only "103.9."

I don't think you folks are taking into account that the FM signal does NOT cover all of the Philadelphia area. Would you staff an all-news station with dozens of anchors, reporters, producers and other support personnel on a 270 watt FM signal?

Sure, if you are getting a clear signal on the FM frequency, that's where you tune in. But if you are further away from Center City, you use the AM signal. 270 watts only goes so far.
I was thinking about exactly this while I read through this thread. I was recently in an Uber and the driver listened to KYW NewsRadio the entire time. (Strange in and of itself since every other Uber driver seems to be forced under contract to listen exclusively to 106.1 The Breeze!) Once we got out of the city and into South Jersey, I noticed fleeting moments of static on 103.9 FM. While creeping toward the light at Evesham Rd & Rt. 73 (Marlton, Burlington County), we lost the station completely. The driver hit a pre-set button and up popped 1060 AM, surprisingly bright and crystal clear.

It was an interesting little dichotomy: At the time, the station was making constant references to 103.9 being your alternative to the static on 1060. In this instance, we needed 1060 as an alternative to the static on 103.9. Now is all of this to say that they station should keep mentioning 1060? Not really: Everyone who needs to know that they're on 1060 already knows it. (On our last functional days on earth, we'll still hear the "ten-sixteeeee" part in our heads even though the jingle leaves it out!) But think about who the station wants (needs) to attract with the FM simulcast (i.e., the younger set). Those folks will turn the radio off before they'd switch from 103.9 to 1060. They're only vaguely aware that there even is an AM band. Promoting 1060 is almost like promoting the Pony Express. (Although lately, I suspect my mail would arrive faster via pony.)
 
think about who the station wants (needs) to attract with the FM simulcast (i.e., the younger set). Those folks will turn the radio off before they'd switch from 103.9 to 1060. They're only vaguely aware that there even is an AM band.
But they would switch over to the stream, assuming they'd even listen to 103.9 in the first place. The FM signal is for the younger audience that still listens to radio in the car. The stream is for the even-younger audience that doesn't think to turn the radio on in the first place. The AM is still there for those who know to use it.
 
The new FM brand reasoning is simple: AM band is already a lost cause due to many issues such as interference from pretty much everything and recently the FCC is considering some AM stations to shutdown all operations on such band.
 
But they would switch over to the stream, assuming they'd even listen to 103.9 in the first place. The FM signal is for the younger audience that still listens to radio in the car. The stream is for the even-younger audience that doesn't think to turn the radio on in the first place. The AM is still there for those who know to use it.
I wonder how many internet-only and app-only listeners even know that KYW Newsradio exists. I assume it's a very, very small percentage. After all, these are the same consumers who get news (if they even want it) from their handheld devices.

I'm in total agreement that the FM simulcast--whether it ended up on 103.9 or any other frequency--is solely for in-car listeners.
 
I wonder how many internet-only and app-only listeners even know that KYW Newsradio exists. I assume it's a very, very small percentage. After all, these are the same consumers who get news (if they even want it) from their handheld devices.
Good point. I wonder if any of them use KYW's website in lieu of the audio. A quicker read than a listen (plus if you scroll down, the kitten with the houseplant promotional pic is something they can't convey nearly as well with audio). :D

KYW Radio Logo.png
 
(plus if you scroll down, the kitten with the houseplant promotional pic is something they can't convey nearly as well with audio). :D
 

Attachments

  • GettyImages1263690548-eb8b307c-e501-4728-996e-f2372c53782e.jpg
    GettyImages1263690548-eb8b307c-e501-4728-996e-f2372c53782e.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 5
The sports station, with its younger audience, probably does better, and more importantly, clears Jacksonville for the syndicated programs it carries. I assume that's why other shells of former AM powerhouses are still useful despite having a barely detectable audience. WEEI(AM) 850 Boston was left with ESPN sports talk and overflow play-by-play after primary programming was moved to WEEI-FM 93.7, which dropped variety hits. The AM hovers around 0.1 now, but there are no signs that music will be put back on it or that the license will be
 
A KYW promo does say that you’ve always known us on 1060 and that’s where we’ll always be. I do wish they’d still have the full jingle with 1060 in it but if they’re not going to do that, record it with the 103-9 in its place.
 
In my opinion, AM radio is already in the coffin. The dirt just has to be piled up. Sure, there are listeners now, but what about in 20 years? How many current listeners will still be alive? I can't remember the last time someone under 50 turned on AM radio. Why would they? It sounds like crap with very limited programming choices - news and talk.
 
Are you referring to this?

Is it correct to assume that going all-digital would eliminate most of the reception problems that plague the AM band?
 
Is it correct to assume that going all-digital would eliminate most of the reception problems that plague the AM band?
Without a commitment from automakers and from the consumer electronics industry, and a surge of consumer interest in buying radios of any kind again, digital AM is and always will be dead in the water. The consumers are, by and large, getting everything they want other than right-wing talk on FM. Opening up new musical choices on digital AM isn't going to convince any appreciable number of consumers to run out and buy a new receiver.
 
Without a commitment from automakers and from the consumer electronics industry, and a surge of consumer interest in buying radios of any kind again, digital AM is and always will be dead in the water. The consumers are, by and large, getting everything they want other than right-wing talk on FM. Opening up new musical choices on digital AM isn't going to convince any appreciable number of consumers to run out and buy a new receiver.
There's a potentially interesting thought experiment to be had here. If AM goes all-digital, meaning the sound quality would be almost-infinitely improved, companies might have reason to do new and interesting things with the stations instead of letting them flounder as seems to largely be the case today. (At the very least, companies might start selling their AM stations to a new generation of broadcasters who might be interested in doing something new and interesting with them.) There are enough HD receivers in cars to create word of mouth and perhaps renew automakers' interest in installing them in new cars going forward. I mean, if AM stations can suddenly sound almost as clear as FM's, and there are compelling formats on them, would you be happy driving around knowing that the car next to you has 10 or 15 additional stations to choose from that you don't have?

That's a whole lot of contingencies but I suppose it could theoretically be a way to breathe life back into the AM band.
 
The only problem is you can't pick up digital AM on a traditional radio. So you would need to buy a new radio.
That's why the contingencies of the scenario include (a) interesting content on the clearer AM's so that drivers who already have HD radios will listen to them and (b) word-of-mouth about these "new" stations causing auto buyers to start demanding HD radios in new cars.
 
In my opinion, AM radio is already in the coffin. The dirt just has to be piled up. Sure, there are listeners now, but what about in 20 years? How many current listeners will still be alive? I can't remember the last time someone under 50 turned on AM radio. Why would they? It sounds like crap with very limited programming choices - news and talk.
Whose fault is that? Medium Wave AM can sound very good, and could carry something besides news and talk.
There's just been too much neglect over the last several decades.
 
That's why the contingencies of the scenario include (a) interesting content on the clearer AM's so that drivers who already have HD radios will listen to them and (b) word-of-mouth about these "new" stations causing auto buyers to start demanding HD radios in new cars.

Both of those things have existed for ten years, and we haven't seen a big demand for HD radio. If they are included for free when they buy their cars, people might use them. Otherwise, they want it to work on their standard radio, which isn't possible. The other issue is very few electronics manufacturers make radios any more.

KYW has been available on HD radio for a while, and they have more listeners now that they have an FM station.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom